Cargando…

Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial. METHODS: All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jun, Qin, Jianjun, Jing, Shaowu, Liu, Qing, Cheng, Yunjie, Wang, Yi, Cao, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12874
_version_ 1783377884543451136
author Wang, Jun
Qin, Jianjun
Jing, Shaowu
Liu, Qing
Cheng, Yunjie
Wang, Yi
Cao, Feng
author_facet Wang, Jun
Qin, Jianjun
Jing, Shaowu
Liu, Qing
Cheng, Yunjie
Wang, Yi
Cao, Feng
author_sort Wang, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial. METHODS: All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical treatment (including further definitive chemoradiotherapy or active surveillance) for esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after CRT were retrieved for meta‐analysis. The final date for data retrieval was 30 June 2018. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies including 648 patients met the inclusion criteria: 620 with squamous cell carcinoma and 28 with adenocarcinoma. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in regard to two‐year disease‐free survival (DFS); however, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year DFS. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in two‐year overall survival (OS); nevertheless, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, the addition of surgery to thoracic locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant CRT provided no advantage to long‐term survival. As an exception, the two‐year DFS and OS could be improved. This research conclusion might be more suitable to patients with squamous cell carcinoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6275815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62758152018-12-06 Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Wang, Jun Qin, Jianjun Jing, Shaowu Liu, Qing Cheng, Yunjie Wang, Yi Cao, Feng Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial. METHODS: All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical treatment (including further definitive chemoradiotherapy or active surveillance) for esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after CRT were retrieved for meta‐analysis. The final date for data retrieval was 30 June 2018. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies including 648 patients met the inclusion criteria: 620 with squamous cell carcinoma and 28 with adenocarcinoma. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in regard to two‐year disease‐free survival (DFS); however, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year DFS. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in two‐year overall survival (OS); nevertheless, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, the addition of surgery to thoracic locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant CRT provided no advantage to long‐term survival. As an exception, the two‐year DFS and OS could be improved. This research conclusion might be more suitable to patients with squamous cell carcinoma. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018-10-01 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6275815/ /pubmed/30277016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12874 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wang, Jun
Qin, Jianjun
Jing, Shaowu
Liu, Qing
Cheng, Yunjie
Wang, Yi
Cao, Feng
Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: is esophagectomy always necessary? a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12874
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjun clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinjianjun clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jingshaowu clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuqing clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chengyunjie clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyi clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caofeng clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis