Cargando…
Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis
BACKGROUND: Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial. METHODS: All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12874 |
_version_ | 1783377884543451136 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jun Qin, Jianjun Jing, Shaowu Liu, Qing Cheng, Yunjie Wang, Yi Cao, Feng |
author_facet | Wang, Jun Qin, Jianjun Jing, Shaowu Liu, Qing Cheng, Yunjie Wang, Yi Cao, Feng |
author_sort | Wang, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial. METHODS: All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical treatment (including further definitive chemoradiotherapy or active surveillance) for esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after CRT were retrieved for meta‐analysis. The final date for data retrieval was 30 June 2018. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies including 648 patients met the inclusion criteria: 620 with squamous cell carcinoma and 28 with adenocarcinoma. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in regard to two‐year disease‐free survival (DFS); however, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year DFS. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in two‐year overall survival (OS); nevertheless, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, the addition of surgery to thoracic locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant CRT provided no advantage to long‐term survival. As an exception, the two‐year DFS and OS could be improved. This research conclusion might be more suitable to patients with squamous cell carcinoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6275815 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62758152018-12-06 Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis Wang, Jun Qin, Jianjun Jing, Shaowu Liu, Qing Cheng, Yunjie Wang, Yi Cao, Feng Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although a clinical complete response (cCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) could lead to a better prognosis, the choice of a following strategy, such as surgical or non‐surgical approach, remains controversial. METHODS: All articles relevant to a comparison of surgical and non‐surgical treatment (including further definitive chemoradiotherapy or active surveillance) for esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after CRT were retrieved for meta‐analysis. The final date for data retrieval was 30 June 2018. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies including 648 patients met the inclusion criteria: 620 with squamous cell carcinoma and 28 with adenocarcinoma. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in regard to two‐year disease‐free survival (DFS); however, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year DFS. The CRT + surgery group had an advantage over the non‐surgery group in two‐year overall survival (OS); nevertheless, the two groups showed similar results in five‐year OS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, the addition of surgery to thoracic locally advanced esophageal carcinoma patients with a cCR after neoadjuvant CRT provided no advantage to long‐term survival. As an exception, the two‐year DFS and OS could be improved. This research conclusion might be more suitable to patients with squamous cell carcinoma. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018-10-01 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6275815/ /pubmed/30277016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12874 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Wang, Jun Qin, Jianjun Jing, Shaowu Liu, Qing Cheng, Yunjie Wang, Yi Cao, Feng Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: Is esophagectomy always necessary? A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy for carcinoma of thoracic esophagus: is esophagectomy always necessary? a systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjun clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinjianjun clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jingshaowu clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuqing clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chengyunjie clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangyi clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caofeng clinicalcompleteresponseafterchemoradiotherapyforcarcinomaofthoracicesophagusisesophagectomyalwaysnecessaryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |