Cargando…

Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND: Solid predominant lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) have distinct histopathological and clinical characteristics compared with nonsolid subtypes. A comprehensive comparison of altered genes found in solid and nonsolid subtypes has not previously been performed. In this study, we analyzed diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Jizhuang, Ma, Ke, Shi, Yu, Chen, Zongwei, Zhao, Mengnan, Huang, Yiwei, Wang, Shuai, Xi, Junjie, Zhan, Cheng, Xu, Songtao, Wang, Qun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12876
_version_ 1783377890194227200
author Luo, Jizhuang
Ma, Ke
Shi, Yu
Chen, Zongwei
Zhao, Mengnan
Huang, Yiwei
Wang, Shuai
Xi, Junjie
Zhan, Cheng
Xu, Songtao
Wang, Qun
author_facet Luo, Jizhuang
Ma, Ke
Shi, Yu
Chen, Zongwei
Zhao, Mengnan
Huang, Yiwei
Wang, Shuai
Xi, Junjie
Zhan, Cheng
Xu, Songtao
Wang, Qun
author_sort Luo, Jizhuang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Solid predominant lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) have distinct histopathological and clinical characteristics compared with nonsolid subtypes. A comprehensive comparison of altered genes found in solid and nonsolid subtypes has not previously been performed. In this study, we analyzed differences in gene expression, genetic mutations, and DNA methylation to better understand the risk factors for these two subtypes of LUAD. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially mutated genes (DMGs) were analyzed from RNA‐seq data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Broad Institute database. To understand the functional significance of molecular changes, we examined the DEGs and DMGs with Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients in the TCGA cohort and 140 patients in the Broad Institute cohort were included in this study. We identified 75 DEGs, of which 15 were upregulated and 56 downregulated in the solid group relative to the nonsolid group. The DEGs were mainly involved in the regulation of water and fluid transport. We discovered 38 significantly differentially expressed genes that overlapped in the two groups. The DMGs were mainly enriched for pathways involved in cell–cell adhesion, cell adhesion, biological adhesion, and hemophilic cell adhesion. We additionally discovered nine significantly methylated genes between solid and nonsolid LUAD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified distinct DEGs, DMGs, and methylation genes for solid and nonsolid LUAD subtypes. These findings improve our understanding of the different carcinogenesis mechanisms in LUAD and will help to develop new therapeutic strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6275839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62758392018-12-06 Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas Luo, Jizhuang Ma, Ke Shi, Yu Chen, Zongwei Zhao, Mengnan Huang, Yiwei Wang, Shuai Xi, Junjie Zhan, Cheng Xu, Songtao Wang, Qun Thorac Cancer Original Articles BACKGROUND: Solid predominant lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) have distinct histopathological and clinical characteristics compared with nonsolid subtypes. A comprehensive comparison of altered genes found in solid and nonsolid subtypes has not previously been performed. In this study, we analyzed differences in gene expression, genetic mutations, and DNA methylation to better understand the risk factors for these two subtypes of LUAD. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially mutated genes (DMGs) were analyzed from RNA‐seq data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Broad Institute database. To understand the functional significance of molecular changes, we examined the DEGs and DMGs with Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients in the TCGA cohort and 140 patients in the Broad Institute cohort were included in this study. We identified 75 DEGs, of which 15 were upregulated and 56 downregulated in the solid group relative to the nonsolid group. The DEGs were mainly involved in the regulation of water and fluid transport. We discovered 38 significantly differentially expressed genes that overlapped in the two groups. The DMGs were mainly enriched for pathways involved in cell–cell adhesion, cell adhesion, biological adhesion, and hemophilic cell adhesion. We additionally discovered nine significantly methylated genes between solid and nonsolid LUAD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified distinct DEGs, DMGs, and methylation genes for solid and nonsolid LUAD subtypes. These findings improve our understanding of the different carcinogenesis mechanisms in LUAD and will help to develop new therapeutic strategies. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2018-10-01 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6275839/ /pubmed/30276966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12876 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Luo, Jizhuang
Ma, Ke
Shi, Yu
Chen, Zongwei
Zhao, Mengnan
Huang, Yiwei
Wang, Shuai
Xi, Junjie
Zhan, Cheng
Xu, Songtao
Wang, Qun
Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
title Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
title_full Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
title_fullStr Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
title_short Genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
title_sort genetic analyses of differences between solid and nonsolid predominant lung adenocarcinomas
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6275839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30276966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12876
work_keys_str_mv AT luojizhuang geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT make geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT shiyu geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT chenzongwei geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT zhaomengnan geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT huangyiwei geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT wangshuai geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT xijunjie geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT zhancheng geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT xusongtao geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas
AT wangqun geneticanalysesofdifferencesbetweensolidandnonsolidpredominantlungadenocarcinomas