Cargando…
Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radio- or chemoradiation (nIRT) therapy is the standard treatment for loco-regional advanced rectal cancer patients of the lower or middle third. Currently, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is not the recommended radiation technique even though IMRT has advantages...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1187-7 |
_version_ | 1783377973945040896 |
---|---|
author | Dapper, Hendrik Rodríguez, Iván Münch, Stefan Peeken, Jan C. Borm, Kai Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel |
author_facet | Dapper, Hendrik Rodríguez, Iván Münch, Stefan Peeken, Jan C. Borm, Kai Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel |
author_sort | Dapper, Hendrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radio- or chemoradiation (nIRT) therapy is the standard treatment for loco-regional advanced rectal cancer patients of the lower or middle third. Currently, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is not the recommended radiation technique even though IMRT has advantages compared to 3D-radiation regarding dose sparing to organs at risk like small bowel and urinary bladder. So far, the benefit of IMRT concerning the anal sphincter complex is not examined. With this study we intended to evaluate the dose distribution on the anal sphincters of rectal cancer patients treated with IMRT in comparison with 3D-techniques. METHODS: We selected 16 patients for the IMRT-group and 16 patients for the 3D-group with rectal cancer of the middle third who were treated in our institute. All patients received 45 Gy in a chemoradiation protocol. Patients in both groups were matched regarding stage, primary tumor distance to the anal verge and size of the tumor. We delineated the internal and external anal sphincters, the addition of both sphincters and the levator ani muscle in all patients. Subsequently, we evaluated and compared dose parameters of the different sphincters in both groups and analysed the configuration of the isodoses in the area of the caudal radiation field, respectively. RESULTS: Most of the relevant dose parameters of the caudal sphincters (Dmean, Dmedian, V10–V40) were significantly reduced in the IMRT-group compared to the 3D-group. Accordingly, the isodoses at the caudal edge of the target volume in the IMRT group demonstrated a steep dose fall. The levator ani muscle always was included into the planned target volumes and received the full dose in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The modern VMAT-IMRT can significantly reduce the dose to the anal sphincters for rectal cancer patients of the middle third who were treated with conventional chemoradiation therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6276230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62762302018-12-06 Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer Dapper, Hendrik Rodríguez, Iván Münch, Stefan Peeken, Jan C. Borm, Kai Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant radio- or chemoradiation (nIRT) therapy is the standard treatment for loco-regional advanced rectal cancer patients of the lower or middle third. Currently, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is not the recommended radiation technique even though IMRT has advantages compared to 3D-radiation regarding dose sparing to organs at risk like small bowel and urinary bladder. So far, the benefit of IMRT concerning the anal sphincter complex is not examined. With this study we intended to evaluate the dose distribution on the anal sphincters of rectal cancer patients treated with IMRT in comparison with 3D-techniques. METHODS: We selected 16 patients for the IMRT-group and 16 patients for the 3D-group with rectal cancer of the middle third who were treated in our institute. All patients received 45 Gy in a chemoradiation protocol. Patients in both groups were matched regarding stage, primary tumor distance to the anal verge and size of the tumor. We delineated the internal and external anal sphincters, the addition of both sphincters and the levator ani muscle in all patients. Subsequently, we evaluated and compared dose parameters of the different sphincters in both groups and analysed the configuration of the isodoses in the area of the caudal radiation field, respectively. RESULTS: Most of the relevant dose parameters of the caudal sphincters (Dmean, Dmedian, V10–V40) were significantly reduced in the IMRT-group compared to the 3D-group. Accordingly, the isodoses at the caudal edge of the target volume in the IMRT group demonstrated a steep dose fall. The levator ani muscle always was included into the planned target volumes and received the full dose in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The modern VMAT-IMRT can significantly reduce the dose to the anal sphincters for rectal cancer patients of the middle third who were treated with conventional chemoradiation therapy. BioMed Central 2018-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6276230/ /pubmed/30509284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1187-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dapper, Hendrik Rodríguez, Iván Münch, Stefan Peeken, Jan C. Borm, Kai Combs, Stephanie E. Habermehl, Daniel Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
title | Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
title_full | Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
title_short | Impact of VMAT-IMRT compared to 3D conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
title_sort | impact of vmat-imrt compared to 3d conformal radiotherapy on anal sphincter dose distribution in neoadjuvant chemoradiation of rectal cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509284 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1187-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dapperhendrik impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer AT rodriguezivan impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer AT munchstefan impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer AT peekenjanc impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer AT bormkai impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer AT combsstephaniee impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer AT habermehldaniel impactofvmatimrtcomparedto3dconformalradiotherapyonanalsphincterdosedistributioninneoadjuvantchemoradiationofrectalcancer |