Cargando…
Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany
BACKGROUND: In response to a rising shortage of general practitioners (GPs), physicians in general internal medicine (GIM) have become part of the German primary care physician workforce. Previous studies have shown substantial differences in practice patterns between both specialties. The aim of th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0878-3 |
_version_ | 1783377982344134656 |
---|---|
author | Strumann, C. Flägel, K. Emcke, T. Steinhäuser, J. |
author_facet | Strumann, C. Flägel, K. Emcke, T. Steinhäuser, J. |
author_sort | Strumann, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In response to a rising shortage of general practitioners (GPs), physicians in general internal medicine (GIM) have become part of the German primary care physician workforce. Previous studies have shown substantial differences in practice patterns between both specialties. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the application of procedures by German GPs and GIM physicians based on routine data. METHODS: The Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in the federal state Schleswig-Holstein (Northern Germany) provided invoicing data of the first quarters of 2013 and 2015. Differences between GPs and GIM physicians in the implementation rate of 46 selected primary care procedures were examined by means of the Pearson χ(2)-test. The selection of procedures was based on international and own preliminary studies on primary care procedures. RESULTS: In the first quarter of 2013/2015 respectively, 1228/1227 GPs and 447/484 GIM physicians provided services in Schleswig-Holstein. Significant differences were found for 20 of the 46 procedures. GPs had higher application rates of procedures concerning health screening (e.g. adolescent health examination, well-child visits) and minor surgery. GIM physicians more often applied technology-oriented procedures, such as ultrasound scans, electrocardiograms (ECG), and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements. The treatment patterns of both specialities did not vary much during the study period. Cardiac stress testing was the only significantly increased GP procedure in that time. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest substantial differences in the application of procedures between GPs and GIM physicians with potential consequences for the overall primary healthcare provision. The findings could foster a discussion about training needs for procedures in primary care to ensure its comprehensiveness. The results reflect scope for changes in vocational training in the future for an effective and efficient re-allocation of primary healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6276264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62762642018-12-06 Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany Strumann, C. Flägel, K. Emcke, T. Steinhäuser, J. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: In response to a rising shortage of general practitioners (GPs), physicians in general internal medicine (GIM) have become part of the German primary care physician workforce. Previous studies have shown substantial differences in practice patterns between both specialties. The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the application of procedures by German GPs and GIM physicians based on routine data. METHODS: The Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians in the federal state Schleswig-Holstein (Northern Germany) provided invoicing data of the first quarters of 2013 and 2015. Differences between GPs and GIM physicians in the implementation rate of 46 selected primary care procedures were examined by means of the Pearson χ(2)-test. The selection of procedures was based on international and own preliminary studies on primary care procedures. RESULTS: In the first quarter of 2013/2015 respectively, 1228/1227 GPs and 447/484 GIM physicians provided services in Schleswig-Holstein. Significant differences were found for 20 of the 46 procedures. GPs had higher application rates of procedures concerning health screening (e.g. adolescent health examination, well-child visits) and minor surgery. GIM physicians more often applied technology-oriented procedures, such as ultrasound scans, electrocardiograms (ECG), and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements. The treatment patterns of both specialities did not vary much during the study period. Cardiac stress testing was the only significantly increased GP procedure in that time. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest substantial differences in the application of procedures between GPs and GIM physicians with potential consequences for the overall primary healthcare provision. The findings could foster a discussion about training needs for procedures in primary care to ensure its comprehensiveness. The results reflect scope for changes in vocational training in the future for an effective and efficient re-allocation of primary healthcare. BioMed Central 2018-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6276264/ /pubmed/30509221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0878-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Strumann, C. Flägel, K. Emcke, T. Steinhäuser, J. Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany |
title | Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany |
title_full | Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany |
title_fullStr | Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany |
title_short | Procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from Northern Germany |
title_sort | procedures performed by general practitioners and general internal medicine physicians - a comparison based on routine data from northern germany |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0878-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strumannc proceduresperformedbygeneralpractitionersandgeneralinternalmedicinephysiciansacomparisonbasedonroutinedatafromnortherngermany AT flagelk proceduresperformedbygeneralpractitionersandgeneralinternalmedicinephysiciansacomparisonbasedonroutinedatafromnortherngermany AT emcket proceduresperformedbygeneralpractitionersandgeneralinternalmedicinephysiciansacomparisonbasedonroutinedatafromnortherngermany AT steinhauserj proceduresperformedbygeneralpractitionersandgeneralinternalmedicinephysiciansacomparisonbasedonroutinedatafromnortherngermany |