Cargando…

Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)

Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommenda...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wert, Guido, Heindryckx, Björn, Pennings, Guido, Clarke, Angus, Eichenlaub-Ritter, Ursula, van El, Carla G, Forzano, Francesca, Goddijn, Mariëtte, Howard, Heidi C, Radojkovic, Dragica, Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle, Dondorp, Wybo, Tarlatzis, Basil C, Cornel, Martina C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox024
_version_ 1783378052499111936
author de Wert, Guido
Heindryckx, Björn
Pennings, Guido
Clarke, Angus
Eichenlaub-Ritter, Ursula
van El, Carla G
Forzano, Francesca
Goddijn, Mariëtte
Howard, Heidi C
Radojkovic, Dragica
Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
Dondorp, Wybo
Tarlatzis, Basil C
Cornel, Martina C
author_facet de Wert, Guido
Heindryckx, Björn
Pennings, Guido
Clarke, Angus
Eichenlaub-Ritter, Ursula
van El, Carla G
Forzano, Francesca
Goddijn, Mariëtte
Howard, Heidi C
Radojkovic, Dragica
Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
Dondorp, Wybo
Tarlatzis, Basil C
Cornel, Martina C
author_sort de Wert, Guido
collection PubMed
description Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommendations to inform and stimulate ongoing societal debates. This document provides the background to the Recommendations. Germline gene editing is currently not allowed in many countries. This makes clinical applications in these countries impossible now, even if germline gene editing would become safe and effective. What were the arguments behind this legislation, and are they still convincing? If a technique could help to avoid serious genetic disorders, in a safe and effective way, would this be a reason to reconsider earlier standpoints? This Background document summarizes the scientific developments and expectations regarding germline gene editing, legal regulations at the European level, and ethics for three different settings (basic research, pre-clinical research and clinical applications). In ethical terms, we argue that the deontological objections (e.g. gene editing goes against nature) do not seem convincing while consequentialist objections (e.g. safety for the children thus conceived and following generations) require research, not all of which is allowed in the current legal situation in European countries. Development of this Background document and Recommendations reflects the responsibility to help society understand and debate the full range of possible implications of the new technologies, and to contribute to regulations that are adapted to the dynamics of the field while taking account of ethical considerations and societal concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6276657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62766572019-03-20 Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡) de Wert, Guido Heindryckx, Björn Pennings, Guido Clarke, Angus Eichenlaub-Ritter, Ursula van El, Carla G Forzano, Francesca Goddijn, Mariëtte Howard, Heidi C Radojkovic, Dragica Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle Dondorp, Wybo Tarlatzis, Basil C Cornel, Martina C Hum Reprod Open ESHRE Pages Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommendations to inform and stimulate ongoing societal debates. This document provides the background to the Recommendations. Germline gene editing is currently not allowed in many countries. This makes clinical applications in these countries impossible now, even if germline gene editing would become safe and effective. What were the arguments behind this legislation, and are they still convincing? If a technique could help to avoid serious genetic disorders, in a safe and effective way, would this be a reason to reconsider earlier standpoints? This Background document summarizes the scientific developments and expectations regarding germline gene editing, legal regulations at the European level, and ethics for three different settings (basic research, pre-clinical research and clinical applications). In ethical terms, we argue that the deontological objections (e.g. gene editing goes against nature) do not seem convincing while consequentialist objections (e.g. safety for the children thus conceived and following generations) require research, not all of which is allowed in the current legal situation in European countries. Development of this Background document and Recommendations reflects the responsibility to help society understand and debate the full range of possible implications of the new technologies, and to contribute to regulations that are adapted to the dynamics of the field while taking account of ethical considerations and societal concerns. Oxford University Press 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6276657/ /pubmed/31490459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox024 Text en This article has been co-published with permission in HROpen and European Journal of Human Genetics. © The Authors, 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle ESHRE Pages
de Wert, Guido
Heindryckx, Björn
Pennings, Guido
Clarke, Angus
Eichenlaub-Ritter, Ursula
van El, Carla G
Forzano, Francesca
Goddijn, Mariëtte
Howard, Heidi C
Radojkovic, Dragica
Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle
Dondorp, Wybo
Tarlatzis, Basil C
Cornel, Martina C
Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
title Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
title_full Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
title_fullStr Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
title_full_unstemmed Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
title_short Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE(†)(‡)
title_sort responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. background document to the recommendations of eshg and eshre(†)(‡)
topic ESHRE Pages
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31490459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox024
work_keys_str_mv AT dewertguido responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT heindryckxbjorn responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT penningsguido responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT clarkeangus responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT eichenlaubritterursula responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT vanelcarlag responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT forzanofrancesca responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT goddijnmariette responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT howardheidic responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT radojkovicdragica responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT rialsebbagemmanuelle responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT dondorpwybo responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT tarlatzisbasilc responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT cornelmartinac responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre
AT responsibleinnovationinhumangermlinegeneeditingbackgrounddocumenttotherecommendationsofeshgandeshre