Cargando…

Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol

STUDY QUESTION: Does intentional endometrial injury (i.e. endometrial scratching) during ART enhance pregnancy rates? SUMMARY ANSWER: We propose a randomized controlled clinical trial in women performing ART in which the intervention group will undergo an additional endometrial biopsy during exogeno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel, Mackens, Shari, Tournaye, Herman, Blockeel, Christophe, Stoop, Dominic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox022
_version_ 1783378052743430144
author Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Mackens, Shari
Tournaye, Herman
Blockeel, Christophe
Stoop, Dominic
author_facet Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Mackens, Shari
Tournaye, Herman
Blockeel, Christophe
Stoop, Dominic
author_sort Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: Does intentional endometrial injury (i.e. endometrial scratching) during ART enhance pregnancy rates? SUMMARY ANSWER: We propose a randomized controlled clinical trial in women performing ART in which the intervention group will undergo an additional endometrial biopsy during exogenous ovarian stimulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although endometrial receptivity has been extensively studied, the mechanisms behind the implantation of an embryo remain largely a mystery. Intentional endometrial injury has been put forward by many researchers as an inexpensive clinical tool capable of enhancing endometrial receptivity. However, despite its widespread use, the benefit of endometrial scratching is still a contentious and unresolved issue. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Pragmatic two-arm randomized, single-centre, controlled open-label trial in women undergoing exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation for ART followed by a fresh embryo transfer in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppressed cycle. The trial will include 360 women in total with a 1:1 allocation ratio and an expected total duration of up to 45 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Subjects in the intervention group will undergo an endometrial biopsy during the follicular phase, on the sixth to eighth day of exogenous stimulation. Furthermore, nested within this clinical trial, we will also evaluate whether the transcriptomic signatures of the material collected during the biopsy may accurately distinguish women who become pregnant from those who do not. These endometrial transcriptomic signatures will be assessed both immediately after the biopsy and following in-vitro decidualization. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Our primary objective is to assess the effect of endometrial injury during exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation on clinical pregnancy rates after ART. Secondary efficacy and safety outcomes include: live-birth delivery after 24 weeks, the endometrial transcriptomic profile among women in the intervention group, short-term safety (e.g. procedure intolerance due to pain, post-procedure bleeding) and long-term safety (e.g. cancelled transfers, miscarriage) outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to its pragmatic design, this study may have limited power to determine one or more of our secondary outcomes and whether there are specific subgroups of women who may benefit significantly from performing endometrial scratching and endometrial transcriptomic profiling. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite the weak biological plausibility, heterogeneity in the existing randomized controlled trials and lack of evaluation of any potential risks associated with endometrial scratching, this procedure is still widely applied in current clinical practice. This clinical trial aims to pragmatically assess the potential benefits and harms of the generalized use of this strategy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): this study has received a grant from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO, 1524417N). This organization has no further role in the study, namely with regards to protocol development, study conduction and evaluation of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02061228. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 10 February 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 3 April 2014. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6276659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62766592019-03-20 Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel Mackens, Shari Tournaye, Herman Blockeel, Christophe Stoop, Dominic Hum Reprod Open Protocol STUDY QUESTION: Does intentional endometrial injury (i.e. endometrial scratching) during ART enhance pregnancy rates? SUMMARY ANSWER: We propose a randomized controlled clinical trial in women performing ART in which the intervention group will undergo an additional endometrial biopsy during exogenous ovarian stimulation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Although endometrial receptivity has been extensively studied, the mechanisms behind the implantation of an embryo remain largely a mystery. Intentional endometrial injury has been put forward by many researchers as an inexpensive clinical tool capable of enhancing endometrial receptivity. However, despite its widespread use, the benefit of endometrial scratching is still a contentious and unresolved issue. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Pragmatic two-arm randomized, single-centre, controlled open-label trial in women undergoing exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation for ART followed by a fresh embryo transfer in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppressed cycle. The trial will include 360 women in total with a 1:1 allocation ratio and an expected total duration of up to 45 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Subjects in the intervention group will undergo an endometrial biopsy during the follicular phase, on the sixth to eighth day of exogenous stimulation. Furthermore, nested within this clinical trial, we will also evaluate whether the transcriptomic signatures of the material collected during the biopsy may accurately distinguish women who become pregnant from those who do not. These endometrial transcriptomic signatures will be assessed both immediately after the biopsy and following in-vitro decidualization. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Our primary objective is to assess the effect of endometrial injury during exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation on clinical pregnancy rates after ART. Secondary efficacy and safety outcomes include: live-birth delivery after 24 weeks, the endometrial transcriptomic profile among women in the intervention group, short-term safety (e.g. procedure intolerance due to pain, post-procedure bleeding) and long-term safety (e.g. cancelled transfers, miscarriage) outcomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Owing to its pragmatic design, this study may have limited power to determine one or more of our secondary outcomes and whether there are specific subgroups of women who may benefit significantly from performing endometrial scratching and endometrial transcriptomic profiling. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Despite the weak biological plausibility, heterogeneity in the existing randomized controlled trials and lack of evaluation of any potential risks associated with endometrial scratching, this procedure is still widely applied in current clinical practice. This clinical trial aims to pragmatically assess the potential benefits and harms of the generalized use of this strategy. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): this study has received a grant from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO, 1524417N). This organization has no further role in the study, namely with regards to protocol development, study conduction and evaluation of results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02061228. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 10 February 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 3 April 2014. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.0. Oxford University Press 2017-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6276659/ /pubmed/30895236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox022 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Protocol
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Mackens, Shari
Tournaye, Herman
Blockeel, Christophe
Stoop, Dominic
Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
title Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
title_full Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
title_fullStr Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
title_short Endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the Receptivity Enhancement by Follicular-phase Renewal after Endometrial ScratcHing (REFRESH) trial protocol
title_sort endometrial receptivity enhancement through induced injury and repair during ovarian stimulation: the receptivity enhancement by follicular-phase renewal after endometrial scratching (refresh) trial protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30895236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hox022
work_keys_str_mv AT santosribeirosamuel endometrialreceptivityenhancementthroughinducedinjuryandrepairduringovarianstimulationthereceptivityenhancementbyfollicularphaserenewalafterendometrialscratchingrefreshtrialprotocol
AT mackensshari endometrialreceptivityenhancementthroughinducedinjuryandrepairduringovarianstimulationthereceptivityenhancementbyfollicularphaserenewalafterendometrialscratchingrefreshtrialprotocol
AT tournayeherman endometrialreceptivityenhancementthroughinducedinjuryandrepairduringovarianstimulationthereceptivityenhancementbyfollicularphaserenewalafterendometrialscratchingrefreshtrialprotocol
AT blockeelchristophe endometrialreceptivityenhancementthroughinducedinjuryandrepairduringovarianstimulationthereceptivityenhancementbyfollicularphaserenewalafterendometrialscratchingrefreshtrialprotocol
AT stoopdominic endometrialreceptivityenhancementthroughinducedinjuryandrepairduringovarianstimulationthereceptivityenhancementbyfollicularphaserenewalafterendometrialscratchingrefreshtrialprotocol