Cargando…
A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
Background. Hand disinfection is frequently recommended for prevention of rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-associated common colds. The effectiveness of this intervention has not been established in a natural setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hand disinfection on RV i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22109950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis201 |
_version_ | 1783378086369165312 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Ronald B. Fuls, Janice L. Rodgers, Nancy D. Goldfarb, Heidi B. Lockhart, Leslie K. Aust, Louise B. |
author_facet | Turner, Ronald B. Fuls, Janice L. Rodgers, Nancy D. Goldfarb, Heidi B. Lockhart, Leslie K. Aust, Louise B. |
author_sort | Turner, Ronald B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Hand disinfection is frequently recommended for prevention of rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-associated common colds. The effectiveness of this intervention has not been established in a natural setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hand disinfection on RV infection and RV-associated common cold illness in a natural setting. Methods. A controlled clinical trial was done in young adult volunteers during 9 weeks of the fall 2009 RV season. Volunteers were randomized to either an antiviral hand treatment containing 2% citric acid and 2% malic acid in 62% ethanol (n = 116) or to a no-treatment control group (n = 96). The hand treatment was applied every 3 hours while the subjects were awake. All volunteers kept a daily diary of symptoms and had a nasal lavage for polymerase chain reaction once each week and 2 additional lavages around the time of each common cold illness. The primary endpoint was the number of RV-associated illnesses. The incidence of RV infection and of common cold illnesses were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results. The hand treatment did not significantly reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. The total number of common cold illnesses was significantly reduced in the intent-to-treat analysis, but this effect was not seen in the per protocol analysis. Conclusions. In this study, hand disinfection did not reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00993759. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6276926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62769262018-12-11 A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection Turner, Ronald B. Fuls, Janice L. Rodgers, Nancy D. Goldfarb, Heidi B. Lockhart, Leslie K. Aust, Louise B. Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. Hand disinfection is frequently recommended for prevention of rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-associated common colds. The effectiveness of this intervention has not been established in a natural setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hand disinfection on RV infection and RV-associated common cold illness in a natural setting. Methods. A controlled clinical trial was done in young adult volunteers during 9 weeks of the fall 2009 RV season. Volunteers were randomized to either an antiviral hand treatment containing 2% citric acid and 2% malic acid in 62% ethanol (n = 116) or to a no-treatment control group (n = 96). The hand treatment was applied every 3 hours while the subjects were awake. All volunteers kept a daily diary of symptoms and had a nasal lavage for polymerase chain reaction once each week and 2 additional lavages around the time of each common cold illness. The primary endpoint was the number of RV-associated illnesses. The incidence of RV infection and of common cold illnesses were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results. The hand treatment did not significantly reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. The total number of common cold illnesses was significantly reduced in the intent-to-treat analysis, but this effect was not seen in the per protocol analysis. Conclusions. In this study, hand disinfection did not reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00993759. Oxford University Press 2012-05-15 2012-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6276926/ /pubmed/22109950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis201 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Articles and Commentaries Turner, Ronald B. Fuls, Janice L. Rodgers, Nancy D. Goldfarb, Heidi B. Lockhart, Leslie K. Aust, Louise B. A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection |
title | A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection |
title_full | A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection |
title_fullStr | A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection |
title_short | A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection |
title_sort | randomized trial of the efficacy of hand disinfection for prevention of rhinovirus infection |
topic | Articles and Commentaries |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22109950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnerronaldb arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT fulsjanicel arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT rodgersnancyd arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT goldfarbheidib arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT lockhartlesliek arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT austlouiseb arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT turnerronaldb randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT fulsjanicel randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT rodgersnancyd randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT goldfarbheidib randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT lockhartlesliek randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection AT austlouiseb randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection |