Cargando…

A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection

Background. Hand disinfection is frequently recommended for prevention of rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-associated common colds. The effectiveness of this intervention has not been established in a natural setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hand disinfection on RV i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Ronald B., Fuls, Janice L., Rodgers, Nancy D., Goldfarb, Heidi B., Lockhart, Leslie K., Aust, Louise B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22109950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis201
_version_ 1783378086369165312
author Turner, Ronald B.
Fuls, Janice L.
Rodgers, Nancy D.
Goldfarb, Heidi B.
Lockhart, Leslie K.
Aust, Louise B.
author_facet Turner, Ronald B.
Fuls, Janice L.
Rodgers, Nancy D.
Goldfarb, Heidi B.
Lockhart, Leslie K.
Aust, Louise B.
author_sort Turner, Ronald B.
collection PubMed
description Background. Hand disinfection is frequently recommended for prevention of rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-associated common colds. The effectiveness of this intervention has not been established in a natural setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hand disinfection on RV infection and RV-associated common cold illness in a natural setting. Methods. A controlled clinical trial was done in young adult volunteers during 9 weeks of the fall 2009 RV season. Volunteers were randomized to either an antiviral hand treatment containing 2% citric acid and 2% malic acid in 62% ethanol (n = 116) or to a no-treatment control group (n = 96). The hand treatment was applied every 3 hours while the subjects were awake. All volunteers kept a daily diary of symptoms and had a nasal lavage for polymerase chain reaction once each week and 2 additional lavages around the time of each common cold illness. The primary endpoint was the number of RV-associated illnesses. The incidence of RV infection and of common cold illnesses were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results. The hand treatment did not significantly reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. The total number of common cold illnesses was significantly reduced in the intent-to-treat analysis, but this effect was not seen in the per protocol analysis. Conclusions. In this study, hand disinfection did not reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00993759.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6276926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62769262018-12-11 A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection Turner, Ronald B. Fuls, Janice L. Rodgers, Nancy D. Goldfarb, Heidi B. Lockhart, Leslie K. Aust, Louise B. Clin Infect Dis Articles and Commentaries Background. Hand disinfection is frequently recommended for prevention of rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-associated common colds. The effectiveness of this intervention has not been established in a natural setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hand disinfection on RV infection and RV-associated common cold illness in a natural setting. Methods. A controlled clinical trial was done in young adult volunteers during 9 weeks of the fall 2009 RV season. Volunteers were randomized to either an antiviral hand treatment containing 2% citric acid and 2% malic acid in 62% ethanol (n = 116) or to a no-treatment control group (n = 96). The hand treatment was applied every 3 hours while the subjects were awake. All volunteers kept a daily diary of symptoms and had a nasal lavage for polymerase chain reaction once each week and 2 additional lavages around the time of each common cold illness. The primary endpoint was the number of RV-associated illnesses. The incidence of RV infection and of common cold illnesses were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Results. The hand treatment did not significantly reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. The total number of common cold illnesses was significantly reduced in the intent-to-treat analysis, but this effect was not seen in the per protocol analysis. Conclusions. In this study, hand disinfection did not reduce RV infection or RV-related common cold illnesses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00993759. Oxford University Press 2012-05-15 2012-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6276926/ /pubmed/22109950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis201 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Articles and Commentaries
Turner, Ronald B.
Fuls, Janice L.
Rodgers, Nancy D.
Goldfarb, Heidi B.
Lockhart, Leslie K.
Aust, Louise B.
A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
title A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
title_full A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
title_fullStr A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
title_short A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy of Hand Disinfection for Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection
title_sort randomized trial of the efficacy of hand disinfection for prevention of rhinovirus infection
topic Articles and Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6276926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22109950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis201
work_keys_str_mv AT turnerronaldb arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT fulsjanicel arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT rodgersnancyd arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT goldfarbheidib arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT lockhartlesliek arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT austlouiseb arandomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT turnerronaldb randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT fulsjanicel randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT rodgersnancyd randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT goldfarbheidib randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT lockhartlesliek randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection
AT austlouiseb randomizedtrialoftheefficacyofhanddisinfectionforpreventionofrhinovirusinfection