Cargando…

The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of the use of a stent with a string attached after ureteroscopy (URS) for self-removal of the stent by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed concerning pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doersch, Karen M., Elmekresh, Amr, Machen, G. Luke, El Tayeb, Marawan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005
_version_ 1783378124496437248
author Doersch, Karen M.
Elmekresh, Amr
Machen, G. Luke
El Tayeb, Marawan M.
author_facet Doersch, Karen M.
Elmekresh, Amr
Machen, G. Luke
El Tayeb, Marawan M.
author_sort Doersch, Karen M.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of the use of a stent with a string attached after ureteroscopy (URS) for self-removal of the stent by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed concerning patients who underwent URS and received an indwelling stent with or without a string attached to the stent (94 vs 349, respectively). Amongst the string group patients received a single- or a double-arm-stringed stent (31 vs 63, respectively). Statistical analyses included chi-squared and Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: The string group consisted of 94 procedures, in which 59.6% of the patients were male with a mean (SD) age of 50.0 (16.5) years. In the no-string group, 51.3% of the 349 procedures were performed in males and the mean (SD) age was 54.9 (18.1) years. Complication rates were 12.8% in the string group and 14.0% in the no-string group (P = 0.867). In the string group, 17.0% of the patients returned to the Emergency Department, whilst 15.8% of the no-string patients returned (P = 0.753). The complication rate in the single- and double-arm groups were 12.9% and 12.7%, respectively (P > 0.910). Self-removal of stents was successful in 94.7% of patients (89/94). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a stent with a string after URS appears safe and effective. Few patients had difficulty removing their stents and complication rates were similar in the groups with and without a string attached to their stents. Single- and double-arm-stringed stents have similar complication rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6277270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62772702018-12-10 The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain Doersch, Karen M. Elmekresh, Amr Machen, G. Luke El Tayeb, Marawan M. Arab J Urol Stone/Endourology ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of the use of a stent with a string attached after ureteroscopy (URS) for self-removal of the stent by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed concerning patients who underwent URS and received an indwelling stent with or without a string attached to the stent (94 vs 349, respectively). Amongst the string group patients received a single- or a double-arm-stringed stent (31 vs 63, respectively). Statistical analyses included chi-squared and Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: The string group consisted of 94 procedures, in which 59.6% of the patients were male with a mean (SD) age of 50.0 (16.5) years. In the no-string group, 51.3% of the 349 procedures were performed in males and the mean (SD) age was 54.9 (18.1) years. Complication rates were 12.8% in the string group and 14.0% in the no-string group (P = 0.867). In the string group, 17.0% of the patients returned to the Emergency Department, whilst 15.8% of the no-string patients returned (P = 0.753). The complication rate in the single- and double-arm groups were 12.9% and 12.7%, respectively (P > 0.910). Self-removal of stents was successful in 94.7% of patients (89/94). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a stent with a string after URS appears safe and effective. Few patients had difficulty removing their stents and complication rates were similar in the groups with and without a string attached to their stents. Single- and double-arm-stringed stents have similar complication rates. Elsevier 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6277270/ /pubmed/30534444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005 Text en © 2018 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Arab Association of Urology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Stone/Endourology
Doersch, Karen M.
Elmekresh, Amr
Machen, G. Luke
El Tayeb, Marawan M.
The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
title The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
title_full The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
title_fullStr The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
title_full_unstemmed The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
title_short The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
title_sort use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: a safe practice to remain
topic Stone/Endourology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005
work_keys_str_mv AT doerschkarenm theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT elmekreshamr theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT machengluke theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT eltayebmarawanm theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT doerschkarenm useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT elmekreshamr useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT machengluke useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain
AT eltayebmarawanm useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain