Cargando…
The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of the use of a stent with a string attached after ureteroscopy (URS) for self-removal of the stent by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed concerning pati...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005 |
_version_ | 1783378124496437248 |
---|---|
author | Doersch, Karen M. Elmekresh, Amr Machen, G. Luke El Tayeb, Marawan M. |
author_facet | Doersch, Karen M. Elmekresh, Amr Machen, G. Luke El Tayeb, Marawan M. |
author_sort | Doersch, Karen M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of the use of a stent with a string attached after ureteroscopy (URS) for self-removal of the stent by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed concerning patients who underwent URS and received an indwelling stent with or without a string attached to the stent (94 vs 349, respectively). Amongst the string group patients received a single- or a double-arm-stringed stent (31 vs 63, respectively). Statistical analyses included chi-squared and Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: The string group consisted of 94 procedures, in which 59.6% of the patients were male with a mean (SD) age of 50.0 (16.5) years. In the no-string group, 51.3% of the 349 procedures were performed in males and the mean (SD) age was 54.9 (18.1) years. Complication rates were 12.8% in the string group and 14.0% in the no-string group (P = 0.867). In the string group, 17.0% of the patients returned to the Emergency Department, whilst 15.8% of the no-string patients returned (P = 0.753). The complication rate in the single- and double-arm groups were 12.9% and 12.7%, respectively (P > 0.910). Self-removal of stents was successful in 94.7% of patients (89/94). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a stent with a string after URS appears safe and effective. Few patients had difficulty removing their stents and complication rates were similar in the groups with and without a string attached to their stents. Single- and double-arm-stringed stents have similar complication rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6277270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62772702018-12-10 The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain Doersch, Karen M. Elmekresh, Amr Machen, G. Luke El Tayeb, Marawan M. Arab J Urol Stone/Endourology ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety and effectiveness of the use of a stent with a string attached after ureteroscopy (URS) for self-removal of the stent by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective chart review was performed concerning patients who underwent URS and received an indwelling stent with or without a string attached to the stent (94 vs 349, respectively). Amongst the string group patients received a single- or a double-arm-stringed stent (31 vs 63, respectively). Statistical analyses included chi-squared and Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: The string group consisted of 94 procedures, in which 59.6% of the patients were male with a mean (SD) age of 50.0 (16.5) years. In the no-string group, 51.3% of the 349 procedures were performed in males and the mean (SD) age was 54.9 (18.1) years. Complication rates were 12.8% in the string group and 14.0% in the no-string group (P = 0.867). In the string group, 17.0% of the patients returned to the Emergency Department, whilst 15.8% of the no-string patients returned (P = 0.753). The complication rate in the single- and double-arm groups were 12.9% and 12.7%, respectively (P > 0.910). Self-removal of stents was successful in 94.7% of patients (89/94). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a stent with a string after URS appears safe and effective. Few patients had difficulty removing their stents and complication rates were similar in the groups with and without a string attached to their stents. Single- and double-arm-stringed stents have similar complication rates. Elsevier 2018-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6277270/ /pubmed/30534444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005 Text en © 2018 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Arab Association of Urology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Stone/Endourology Doersch, Karen M. Elmekresh, Amr Machen, G. Luke El Tayeb, Marawan M. The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain |
title | The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain |
title_full | The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain |
title_fullStr | The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain |
title_short | The use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: A safe practice to remain |
title_sort | use of a string with a stent for self-removal following ureteroscopy: a safe practice to remain |
topic | Stone/Endourology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doerschkarenm theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT elmekreshamr theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT machengluke theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT eltayebmarawanm theuseofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT doerschkarenm useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT elmekreshamr useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT machengluke useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain AT eltayebmarawanm useofastringwithastentforselfremovalfollowingureteroscopyasafepracticetoremain |