Cargando…
Is the 4.5-F ureteroscope (Ultra-Thin) an alternative in the management of ureteric and renal pelvic stones?
OBJECTIVES: To compare the 7.5–9.5F ureteroscope (URS) with the 4.5–6.5F URS (Ultra-Thin) in terms of success and complication rates in adult patients with ureteric and renal pelvic stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 41 patients treated with 7.5–9.5F semi-rigid URS (Group 1) and 33 patients treat...
Autores principales: | Uzun, Hakkı, Akça, Nezih |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.006 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Ureteric stenting vs not stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: A prospective randomised trial
por: Al Demour, Saddam, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Bilateral same-session flexible ureterorenoscopy for renal and/or ureteric stone disease treatment
por: Arda, Ersan, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Emergency vs elective ureteroscopy for a single ureteric stone
por: Al-Terki, Abdullatif, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Ultrasound versus fluoroscopy-guided ureteroscopy for distal ureteric stones in adults
por: Reda, Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Development and validation of a score for emergency intervention in patients with acute renal colic secondary to ureteric stones
por: Al-Terki, Abdullatif, et al.
Publicado: (2020)