Cargando…

Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis

INTRODUCTION: An adaptive guideline development method, as opposed to a de novo guideline development, is dependent on access to existing high-quality up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We described the characteristics and quality of CPGs relevant to prehospital care worldwide, in order...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCaul, Michael, Clarke, Mike, Bruijns, Stevan R., Hodkinson, Peter W., de Waal, Ben, Pigoga, Jennifer, Wallis, Lee A., Young, Taryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.09.002
_version_ 1783378165697085440
author McCaul, Michael
Clarke, Mike
Bruijns, Stevan R.
Hodkinson, Peter W.
de Waal, Ben
Pigoga, Jennifer
Wallis, Lee A.
Young, Taryn
author_facet McCaul, Michael
Clarke, Mike
Bruijns, Stevan R.
Hodkinson, Peter W.
de Waal, Ben
Pigoga, Jennifer
Wallis, Lee A.
Young, Taryn
author_sort McCaul, Michael
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: An adaptive guideline development method, as opposed to a de novo guideline development, is dependent on access to existing high-quality up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We described the characteristics and quality of CPGs relevant to prehospital care worldwide, in order to strengthen guideline development in low-resource settings for emergency care. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a database of international CPGs relevant to emergency care produced by the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) CPG project in 2016. Guideline quality was assessed with the AGREE II tool, independently and in duplicate. End-user documents such as protocols, care pathways, and algorithms were excluded. Data were imported, managed, and analysed in STATA 14 and R. RESULTS: In total, 276 guidelines were included. Less than 2% of CPGs originated from low- and middle income-countries (LMICs); only 15% (n = 38) of guidelines were prehospital specific, and there were no CPGs directly applicable to prehospital care in LMICs. Most guidelines used de novo methods (58%, n = 150) and were produced by professional societies or associations (63%, n = 164), with the minority developed by international bodies (3%, n = 7). National bodies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), produced higher quality guidelines when compared to international guidelines, professional societies, and clinician/academic-produced guidelines. Guideline quality varied across topics, subpopulations and producers. Resource-constrained guideline developers that cannot afford de novo guideline development have access to an expanding pool of high-quality prehospital guidelines to translate to their local setting. DISCUSSION: Although some high-quality CPGs exist relevant to emergency care, none directly address the needs of prehospital care in LMICs, especially in Africa. Strengthening guideline development capacity, including adaptive guideline development methods that use existing high-quality CPGs, is a priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6277502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher African Federation for Emergency Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62775022018-12-10 Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis McCaul, Michael Clarke, Mike Bruijns, Stevan R. Hodkinson, Peter W. de Waal, Ben Pigoga, Jennifer Wallis, Lee A. Young, Taryn Afr J Emerg Med Original article INTRODUCTION: An adaptive guideline development method, as opposed to a de novo guideline development, is dependent on access to existing high-quality up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We described the characteristics and quality of CPGs relevant to prehospital care worldwide, in order to strengthen guideline development in low-resource settings for emergency care. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a database of international CPGs relevant to emergency care produced by the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) CPG project in 2016. Guideline quality was assessed with the AGREE II tool, independently and in duplicate. End-user documents such as protocols, care pathways, and algorithms were excluded. Data were imported, managed, and analysed in STATA 14 and R. RESULTS: In total, 276 guidelines were included. Less than 2% of CPGs originated from low- and middle income-countries (LMICs); only 15% (n = 38) of guidelines were prehospital specific, and there were no CPGs directly applicable to prehospital care in LMICs. Most guidelines used de novo methods (58%, n = 150) and were produced by professional societies or associations (63%, n = 164), with the minority developed by international bodies (3%, n = 7). National bodies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), produced higher quality guidelines when compared to international guidelines, professional societies, and clinician/academic-produced guidelines. Guideline quality varied across topics, subpopulations and producers. Resource-constrained guideline developers that cannot afford de novo guideline development have access to an expanding pool of high-quality prehospital guidelines to translate to their local setting. DISCUSSION: Although some high-quality CPGs exist relevant to emergency care, none directly address the needs of prehospital care in LMICs, especially in Africa. Strengthening guideline development capacity, including adaptive guideline development methods that use existing high-quality CPGs, is a priority. African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2018-12 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6277502/ /pubmed/30534521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.09.002 Text en 2018 African Federation for Emergency Medicine. Publishing services provided by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original article
McCaul, Michael
Clarke, Mike
Bruijns, Stevan R.
Hodkinson, Peter W.
de Waal, Ben
Pigoga, Jennifer
Wallis, Lee A.
Young, Taryn
Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
title Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
title_full Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
title_fullStr Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
title_short Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
title_sort global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: a landscape analysis
topic Original article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT mccaulmichael globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT clarkemike globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT bruijnsstevanr globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT hodkinsonpeterw globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT dewaalben globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT pigogajennifer globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT wallisleea globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis
AT youngtaryn globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis