Cargando…
Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis
INTRODUCTION: An adaptive guideline development method, as opposed to a de novo guideline development, is dependent on access to existing high-quality up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We described the characteristics and quality of CPGs relevant to prehospital care worldwide, in order...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
African Federation for Emergency Medicine
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.09.002 |
_version_ | 1783378165697085440 |
---|---|
author | McCaul, Michael Clarke, Mike Bruijns, Stevan R. Hodkinson, Peter W. de Waal, Ben Pigoga, Jennifer Wallis, Lee A. Young, Taryn |
author_facet | McCaul, Michael Clarke, Mike Bruijns, Stevan R. Hodkinson, Peter W. de Waal, Ben Pigoga, Jennifer Wallis, Lee A. Young, Taryn |
author_sort | McCaul, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: An adaptive guideline development method, as opposed to a de novo guideline development, is dependent on access to existing high-quality up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We described the characteristics and quality of CPGs relevant to prehospital care worldwide, in order to strengthen guideline development in low-resource settings for emergency care. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a database of international CPGs relevant to emergency care produced by the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) CPG project in 2016. Guideline quality was assessed with the AGREE II tool, independently and in duplicate. End-user documents such as protocols, care pathways, and algorithms were excluded. Data were imported, managed, and analysed in STATA 14 and R. RESULTS: In total, 276 guidelines were included. Less than 2% of CPGs originated from low- and middle income-countries (LMICs); only 15% (n = 38) of guidelines were prehospital specific, and there were no CPGs directly applicable to prehospital care in LMICs. Most guidelines used de novo methods (58%, n = 150) and were produced by professional societies or associations (63%, n = 164), with the minority developed by international bodies (3%, n = 7). National bodies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), produced higher quality guidelines when compared to international guidelines, professional societies, and clinician/academic-produced guidelines. Guideline quality varied across topics, subpopulations and producers. Resource-constrained guideline developers that cannot afford de novo guideline development have access to an expanding pool of high-quality prehospital guidelines to translate to their local setting. DISCUSSION: Although some high-quality CPGs exist relevant to emergency care, none directly address the needs of prehospital care in LMICs, especially in Africa. Strengthening guideline development capacity, including adaptive guideline development methods that use existing high-quality CPGs, is a priority. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6277502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | African Federation for Emergency Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62775022018-12-10 Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis McCaul, Michael Clarke, Mike Bruijns, Stevan R. Hodkinson, Peter W. de Waal, Ben Pigoga, Jennifer Wallis, Lee A. Young, Taryn Afr J Emerg Med Original article INTRODUCTION: An adaptive guideline development method, as opposed to a de novo guideline development, is dependent on access to existing high-quality up-to-date clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We described the characteristics and quality of CPGs relevant to prehospital care worldwide, in order to strengthen guideline development in low-resource settings for emergency care. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study of a database of international CPGs relevant to emergency care produced by the African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) CPG project in 2016. Guideline quality was assessed with the AGREE II tool, independently and in duplicate. End-user documents such as protocols, care pathways, and algorithms were excluded. Data were imported, managed, and analysed in STATA 14 and R. RESULTS: In total, 276 guidelines were included. Less than 2% of CPGs originated from low- and middle income-countries (LMICs); only 15% (n = 38) of guidelines were prehospital specific, and there were no CPGs directly applicable to prehospital care in LMICs. Most guidelines used de novo methods (58%, n = 150) and were produced by professional societies or associations (63%, n = 164), with the minority developed by international bodies (3%, n = 7). National bodies, such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), produced higher quality guidelines when compared to international guidelines, professional societies, and clinician/academic-produced guidelines. Guideline quality varied across topics, subpopulations and producers. Resource-constrained guideline developers that cannot afford de novo guideline development have access to an expanding pool of high-quality prehospital guidelines to translate to their local setting. DISCUSSION: Although some high-quality CPGs exist relevant to emergency care, none directly address the needs of prehospital care in LMICs, especially in Africa. Strengthening guideline development capacity, including adaptive guideline development methods that use existing high-quality CPGs, is a priority. African Federation for Emergency Medicine 2018-12 2018-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6277502/ /pubmed/30534521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.09.002 Text en 2018 African Federation for Emergency Medicine. Publishing services provided by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original article McCaul, Michael Clarke, Mike Bruijns, Stevan R. Hodkinson, Peter W. de Waal, Ben Pigoga, Jennifer Wallis, Lee A. Young, Taryn Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis |
title | Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis |
title_full | Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis |
title_fullStr | Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis |
title_short | Global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: A landscape analysis |
title_sort | global emergency care clinical practice guidelines: a landscape analysis |
topic | Original article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.09.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mccaulmichael globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT clarkemike globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT bruijnsstevanr globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT hodkinsonpeterw globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT dewaalben globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT pigogajennifer globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT wallisleea globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis AT youngtaryn globalemergencycareclinicalpracticeguidelinesalandscapeanalysis |