Cargando…
Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Background: Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOX) combined with cetuximab is rarely used to treat advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study aimed to clarify the clinical benefits of this treatment regimen when used as a first-line therapy in patients with expanded RAS/BRAF/...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519308 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.26840 |
_version_ | 1783378187764367360 |
---|---|
author | Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi Maeda, Hiromichi Hazama, Shoichi Oba, Koji Okayama, Naoko Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Suzuki, Nobuaki Nagano, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Junichi Mishima, Hideyuki Nagata, Naoki |
author_facet | Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi Maeda, Hiromichi Hazama, Shoichi Oba, Koji Okayama, Naoko Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Suzuki, Nobuaki Nagano, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Junichi Mishima, Hideyuki Nagata, Naoki |
author_sort | Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOX) combined with cetuximab is rarely used to treat advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study aimed to clarify the clinical benefits of this treatment regimen when used as a first-line therapy in patients with expanded RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC, using the data and tumor specimens from two previously published Phase II clinical trials. Methods: The gene mutation status and clinical data of 102 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, who received either of CapeOX + cetuximab or FOLFOX + cetuximab, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) of CapeOX + cetuximab treatment in patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. RR comparisons and maximum tumor size changes between different treatment regimens and gene mutation status were set as key secondary endpoints. Results: We identified 88 patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. Those treated with CapeOX + cetuximab (n = 52) had a 61.5% RR (95% CI, 47.0-74.7%), while those treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab (n = 36) had a 66.7% RR (95% CI, 49.0-81.4%). Patients with any mutation (n = 14) had a 42.9% RR (95% CI, 17.1-71.1%). There were no significant differences between these three groups (P = 0.298). The disease control rate was 86.5% (95% CI, 74.2-94.4%) in the CapeOX + cetuximab group, and 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) in the FOLFOX + cetuximab group. Maximum tumor size changes were largest in patients with wild-type mCRC treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab followed by patients with wild-type mCRC treated with CapeOX + cetuximab, and then by those with any mutation (-63.2%, -52.6%, and -27.3%, respectively; P = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC had a sufficient RR following first-line treatment with CapeOX + cetuximab. These results suggest that this combination therapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced mCRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6277612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62776122018-12-05 Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi Maeda, Hiromichi Hazama, Shoichi Oba, Koji Okayama, Naoko Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Suzuki, Nobuaki Nagano, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Junichi Mishima, Hideyuki Nagata, Naoki J Cancer Research Paper Background: Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOX) combined with cetuximab is rarely used to treat advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study aimed to clarify the clinical benefits of this treatment regimen when used as a first-line therapy in patients with expanded RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC, using the data and tumor specimens from two previously published Phase II clinical trials. Methods: The gene mutation status and clinical data of 102 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, who received either of CapeOX + cetuximab or FOLFOX + cetuximab, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) of CapeOX + cetuximab treatment in patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. RR comparisons and maximum tumor size changes between different treatment regimens and gene mutation status were set as key secondary endpoints. Results: We identified 88 patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. Those treated with CapeOX + cetuximab (n = 52) had a 61.5% RR (95% CI, 47.0-74.7%), while those treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab (n = 36) had a 66.7% RR (95% CI, 49.0-81.4%). Patients with any mutation (n = 14) had a 42.9% RR (95% CI, 17.1-71.1%). There were no significant differences between these three groups (P = 0.298). The disease control rate was 86.5% (95% CI, 74.2-94.4%) in the CapeOX + cetuximab group, and 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) in the FOLFOX + cetuximab group. Maximum tumor size changes were largest in patients with wild-type mCRC treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab followed by patients with wild-type mCRC treated with CapeOX + cetuximab, and then by those with any mutation (-63.2%, -52.6%, and -27.3%, respectively; P = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC had a sufficient RR following first-line treatment with CapeOX + cetuximab. These results suggest that this combination therapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced mCRC. Ivyspring International Publisher 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6277612/ /pubmed/30519308 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.26840 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Iwamoto, Shigeyoshi Maeda, Hiromichi Hazama, Shoichi Oba, Koji Okayama, Naoko Suehiro, Yutaka Yamasaki, Takahiro Suzuki, Nobuaki Nagano, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Junichi Mishima, Hideyuki Nagata, Naoki Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title | Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_full | Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_short | Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
title_sort | efficacy of capeox plus cetuximab treatment as a first-line therapy for patients with extended ras/braf/pik3ca wild-type advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277612/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30519308 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.26840 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwamotoshigeyoshi efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT maedahiromichi efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT hazamashoichi efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT obakoji efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT okayamanaoko efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT suehiroyutaka efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT yamasakitakahiro efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT suzukinobuaki efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT naganohiroaki efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT sakamotojunichi efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT mishimahideyuki efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer AT nagatanaoki efficacyofcapeoxpluscetuximabtreatmentasafirstlinetherapyforpatientswithextendedrasbrafpik3cawildtypeadvancedormetastaticcolorectalcancer |