Cargando…
Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce
In Australia and New Zealand, by contrast with much of the developed world, insurance companies can use genetic test results to refuse cover or increase premiums for mutually-rated insurance products, including life, income protection and disability insurance. Genetics professionals regularly discus...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30542646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00333 |
_version_ | 1783378241973649408 |
---|---|
author | Tiller, Jane Keogh, Louise Wake, Samantha Delatycki, Martin Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul |
author_facet | Tiller, Jane Keogh, Louise Wake, Samantha Delatycki, Martin Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul |
author_sort | Tiller, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Australia and New Zealand, by contrast with much of the developed world, insurance companies can use genetic test results to refuse cover or increase premiums for mutually-rated insurance products, including life, income protection and disability insurance. Genetics professionals regularly discuss insurance implications with clients and report the issue as a clinical challenge, yet no studies have examined clinical practices or opinions. This study surveyed genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists from Australia and New Zealand to (i) investigate variability in professional practice across the Australasian clinical genetic workforce relating to the insurance implications of genetic testing, and (ii) ascertain views regarding current regulation of the issue. There was considerable variability in training and clinical policies, especially around the communication of insurance implications. Almost half of participants reported receiving no training on the insurance implications of genetic testing, and almost 40% were unsure whether they could adequately advise clients. A number of deficits in professional knowledge and understanding of the issue were identified. Widespread concerns regarding regulation of this area were reported, with < 10% of Australian participants considering current Australian regulations as adequate to protect clients from genetic discrimination. The findings from this study highlight scope for greater education, consistency and professional training on the issue of genetics and insurance in Australasia, and strong agreement about the need for regulatory reform. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6277853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62778532018-12-12 Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce Tiller, Jane Keogh, Louise Wake, Samantha Delatycki, Martin Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul Front Public Health Public Health In Australia and New Zealand, by contrast with much of the developed world, insurance companies can use genetic test results to refuse cover or increase premiums for mutually-rated insurance products, including life, income protection and disability insurance. Genetics professionals regularly discuss insurance implications with clients and report the issue as a clinical challenge, yet no studies have examined clinical practices or opinions. This study surveyed genetic counsellors and clinical geneticists from Australia and New Zealand to (i) investigate variability in professional practice across the Australasian clinical genetic workforce relating to the insurance implications of genetic testing, and (ii) ascertain views regarding current regulation of the issue. There was considerable variability in training and clinical policies, especially around the communication of insurance implications. Almost half of participants reported receiving no training on the insurance implications of genetic testing, and almost 40% were unsure whether they could adequately advise clients. A number of deficits in professional knowledge and understanding of the issue were identified. Widespread concerns regarding regulation of this area were reported, with < 10% of Australian participants considering current Australian regulations as adequate to protect clients from genetic discrimination. The findings from this study highlight scope for greater education, consistency and professional training on the issue of genetics and insurance in Australasia, and strong agreement about the need for regulatory reform. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6277853/ /pubmed/30542646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00333 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tiller, Keogh, Wake, Delatycki, Otlowski and Lacaze. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Tiller, Jane Keogh, Louise Wake, Samantha Delatycki, Martin Otlowski, Margaret Lacaze, Paul Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce |
title | Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce |
title_full | Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce |
title_fullStr | Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce |
title_full_unstemmed | Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce |
title_short | Genetics, Insurance and Professional Practice: Survey of the Australasian Clinical Genetics Workforce |
title_sort | genetics, insurance and professional practice: survey of the australasian clinical genetics workforce |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6277853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30542646 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tillerjane geneticsinsuranceandprofessionalpracticesurveyoftheaustralasianclinicalgeneticsworkforce AT keoghlouise geneticsinsuranceandprofessionalpracticesurveyoftheaustralasianclinicalgeneticsworkforce AT wakesamantha geneticsinsuranceandprofessionalpracticesurveyoftheaustralasianclinicalgeneticsworkforce AT delatyckimartin geneticsinsuranceandprofessionalpracticesurveyoftheaustralasianclinicalgeneticsworkforce AT otlowskimargaret geneticsinsuranceandprofessionalpracticesurveyoftheaustralasianclinicalgeneticsworkforce AT lacazepaul geneticsinsuranceandprofessionalpracticesurveyoftheaustralasianclinicalgeneticsworkforce |