Cargando…
Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Imprinted genes are regulated by DNA methylation at imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions (iDMRs). Abnormal expression of imprinted genes is implicated in imprinting disorders and tumors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), methylation and imprinting status of the IGF2/H19 doma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9 |
_version_ | 1783378285496893440 |
---|---|
author | Hidaka, Hidenori Higashimoto, Ken Aoki, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Hayashida, Chisa Maeda, Toshiyuki Koga, Yasuo Yatsuki, Hitomi Joh, Keiichiro Noshiro, Hirokazu Iwakiri, Ryuichi Kawaguchi, Atsushi Yoshiura, Koh-ichiro Fujimoto, Kazuma Soejima, Hidenobu |
author_facet | Hidaka, Hidenori Higashimoto, Ken Aoki, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Hayashida, Chisa Maeda, Toshiyuki Koga, Yasuo Yatsuki, Hitomi Joh, Keiichiro Noshiro, Hirokazu Iwakiri, Ryuichi Kawaguchi, Atsushi Yoshiura, Koh-ichiro Fujimoto, Kazuma Soejima, Hidenobu |
author_sort | Hidaka, Hidenori |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Imprinted genes are regulated by DNA methylation at imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions (iDMRs). Abnormal expression of imprinted genes is implicated in imprinting disorders and tumors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), methylation and imprinting status of the IGF2/H19 domain have been studied. However, no comprehensive methylation analysis of iDMRs in CRC has been reported. Furthermore, the relationship between iDMR methylation status and other methylation-related issues, such as CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) methylation, remains unclear. RESULTS: We analyzed the methylation status of 38 iDMRs in 106 CRC patients. We also investigated CIMP, LINE-1 methylation, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations, and loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2. We further examined the relationship between these factors and clinicopathological factors. The overall trend in iDMR methylation was towards hypermethylation, and iDMRs could be grouped into three categories: susceptible, resistant, and intermediate-to-aberrant methylation. The susceptible and resistant iDMRs consisted of all types of iDMR (gametic and somatic, maternally and paternally methylated). Hypermethylation of multiple iDMRs (HyMiD)-positive status was statistically associated with CIMP-positive status, but not associated with mutations in the BRAF and KRAS genes. HyMiD-positive status was inversely associated with LINE-1 methylation. Among four iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain, IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation occurred most frequently, but was not associated with IGF2 LOI. Finally, we statistically calculated predictive prognostic scores based on aberrant methylation status of three iDMRs. CONCLUSION: In CRC tissues, some iDMRs were susceptible to hypermethylation independent of the type of iDMR and genomic sequence. Although HyMiD-positive status was associated with CIMP-positive status, this was independent of the BRAF and KRAS pathways, which are responsible for CIMP. Since IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation and aberrant methylation of other iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain were not associated with IGF2 LOI, dysfunction of any of the molecular components related to imprinting regulation may be involved in IGF2 LOI. The prognostic score calculated based on aberrant methylation of three iDMRs has potential clinical applications as a prognostic predictor in patients. Further study is required to understand the biological significance of, and mechanisms behind, aberrant methylation of iDMRs and IGF2 LOI in CRCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6278095 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62780952018-12-10 Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer Hidaka, Hidenori Higashimoto, Ken Aoki, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Hayashida, Chisa Maeda, Toshiyuki Koga, Yasuo Yatsuki, Hitomi Joh, Keiichiro Noshiro, Hirokazu Iwakiri, Ryuichi Kawaguchi, Atsushi Yoshiura, Koh-ichiro Fujimoto, Kazuma Soejima, Hidenobu Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Imprinted genes are regulated by DNA methylation at imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions (iDMRs). Abnormal expression of imprinted genes is implicated in imprinting disorders and tumors. In colorectal cancer (CRC), methylation and imprinting status of the IGF2/H19 domain have been studied. However, no comprehensive methylation analysis of iDMRs in CRC has been reported. Furthermore, the relationship between iDMR methylation status and other methylation-related issues, such as CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1) methylation, remains unclear. RESULTS: We analyzed the methylation status of 38 iDMRs in 106 CRC patients. We also investigated CIMP, LINE-1 methylation, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations, and loss of imprinting (LOI) of IGF2. We further examined the relationship between these factors and clinicopathological factors. The overall trend in iDMR methylation was towards hypermethylation, and iDMRs could be grouped into three categories: susceptible, resistant, and intermediate-to-aberrant methylation. The susceptible and resistant iDMRs consisted of all types of iDMR (gametic and somatic, maternally and paternally methylated). Hypermethylation of multiple iDMRs (HyMiD)-positive status was statistically associated with CIMP-positive status, but not associated with mutations in the BRAF and KRAS genes. HyMiD-positive status was inversely associated with LINE-1 methylation. Among four iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain, IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation occurred most frequently, but was not associated with IGF2 LOI. Finally, we statistically calculated predictive prognostic scores based on aberrant methylation status of three iDMRs. CONCLUSION: In CRC tissues, some iDMRs were susceptible to hypermethylation independent of the type of iDMR and genomic sequence. Although HyMiD-positive status was associated with CIMP-positive status, this was independent of the BRAF and KRAS pathways, which are responsible for CIMP. Since IGF2-DMR0 hypomethylation and aberrant methylation of other iDMRs within the IGF2/H19 domain were not associated with IGF2 LOI, dysfunction of any of the molecular components related to imprinting regulation may be involved in IGF2 LOI. The prognostic score calculated based on aberrant methylation of three iDMRs has potential clinical applications as a prognostic predictor in patients. Further study is required to understand the biological significance of, and mechanisms behind, aberrant methylation of iDMRs and IGF2 LOI in CRCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6278095/ /pubmed/30509319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hidaka, Hidenori Higashimoto, Ken Aoki, Saori Mishima, Hiroyuki Hayashida, Chisa Maeda, Toshiyuki Koga, Yasuo Yatsuki, Hitomi Joh, Keiichiro Noshiro, Hirokazu Iwakiri, Ryuichi Kawaguchi, Atsushi Yoshiura, Koh-ichiro Fujimoto, Kazuma Soejima, Hidenobu Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
title | Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
title_full | Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
title_short | Comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
title_sort | comprehensive methylation analysis of imprinting-associated differentially methylated regions in colorectal cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0578-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hidakahidenori comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT higashimotoken comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT aokisaori comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT mishimahiroyuki comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT hayashidachisa comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT maedatoshiyuki comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT kogayasuo comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT yatsukihitomi comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT johkeiichiro comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT noshirohirokazu comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT iwakiriryuichi comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT kawaguchiatsushi comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT yoshiurakohichiro comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT fujimotokazuma comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer AT soejimahidenobu comprehensivemethylationanalysisofimprintingassociateddifferentiallymethylatedregionsincolorectalcancer |