Cargando…

Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring

In the written part of German state exams, multiple choice questions which inherit a flaw are not always excluded but taken into consideration when awarding a grade to any individual candidate, if this is advantageous to the candidate. This process of elimination and compensation of disadvantage in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Möltner, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001195
_version_ 1783378318697955328
author Möltner, Andreas
author_facet Möltner, Andreas
author_sort Möltner, Andreas
collection PubMed
description In the written part of German state exams, multiple choice questions which inherit a flaw are not always excluded but taken into consideration when awarding a grade to any individual candidate, if this is advantageous to the candidate. This process of elimination and compensation of disadvantage in flawed questions, as applied by the Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), can lead to different items being taken into consideration in the grading in individual cases and to the application of different pass and grade boundaries in individual cases. This procedure is applied here to examinations containing items with partial credit scoring. A simple numerical rule can be applied which can be used to decide whether a flawed item has be taken into account in the grading procedure in order to achieve a pass or a particular grade for a candidate. This rule – as in the state examinations – must take account of the individual number of scores achieved in the flawed item and, if the relative pass threshold ("automatic adjustment clause") is applied, the average score achieved in the item by all candidates. In addition, however, it also includes the grade boundaries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6278236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62782362018-12-11 Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring Möltner, Andreas GMS J Med Educ Article In the written part of German state exams, multiple choice questions which inherit a flaw are not always excluded but taken into consideration when awarding a grade to any individual candidate, if this is advantageous to the candidate. This process of elimination and compensation of disadvantage in flawed questions, as applied by the Institut für medizinische und pharmazeutische Prüfungsfragen (IMPP), can lead to different items being taken into consideration in the grading in individual cases and to the application of different pass and grade boundaries in individual cases. This procedure is applied here to examinations containing items with partial credit scoring. A simple numerical rule can be applied which can be used to decide whether a flawed item has be taken into account in the grading procedure in order to achieve a pass or a particular grade for a candidate. This rule – as in the state examinations – must take account of the individual number of scores achieved in the flawed item and, if the relative pass threshold ("automatic adjustment clause") is applied, the average score achieved in the item by all candidates. In addition, however, it also includes the grade boundaries. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6278236/ /pubmed/30539074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001195 Text en Copyright © 2018 Möltner This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Möltner, Andreas
Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
title Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
title_full Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
title_fullStr Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
title_full_unstemmed Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
title_short Dealing with flawed items in examinations: Using the compensation of disadvantage as used in German state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
title_sort dealing with flawed items in examinations: using the compensation of disadvantage as used in german state examinations in items with partial credit scoring
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001195
work_keys_str_mv AT moltnerandreas dealingwithflaweditemsinexaminationsusingthecompensationofdisadvantageasusedingermanstateexaminationsinitemswithpartialcreditscoring