Cargando…

Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion

Background: Chest tube insertion is a standard intervention for management of various injuries of the thorax. Efficient clinical training of this and similar bed-side procedures is equally demanded and improvable. Here, we propose a nouveau means of assessment and feedback using an Objective Structu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedrich, Mirco, Ober, Julian, Haubruck, Patrick, Bergdolt, Christian, Bruckner, Thomas, Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich, Kadmon, Martina, Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter, Tanner, Michael Christopher, Nickel, Felix
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001194
_version_ 1783378319160377344
author Friedrich, Mirco
Ober, Julian
Haubruck, Patrick
Bergdolt, Christian
Bruckner, Thomas
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Kadmon, Martina
Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter
Tanner, Michael Christopher
Nickel, Felix
author_facet Friedrich, Mirco
Ober, Julian
Haubruck, Patrick
Bergdolt, Christian
Bruckner, Thomas
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Kadmon, Martina
Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter
Tanner, Michael Christopher
Nickel, Felix
author_sort Friedrich, Mirco
collection PubMed
description Background: Chest tube insertion is a standard intervention for management of various injuries of the thorax. Efficient clinical training of this and similar bed-side procedures is equally demanded and improvable. Here, we propose a nouveau means of assessment and feedback using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool. The modified OSATS for chest drain insertion is evaluated in a pilot trial focusing on chest drain insertion. Methods: Participants in the pilot trial were medical students (3(rd)-6(th) year of studies, n=9), junior residents (1(st)-3(rd) post-graduate year, n=12), senior residents (4(th)-6(th) post-graduate year, n=14), and attending surgeons (n=6) from Heidelberg University. Chest drain insertions on a cadaveric porcine model were rated by experts with the modified OSATS score. Participants’ performances were videotaped and subsequently rated by two remote experts (video rating). Primary aim was to assess criterion validity of the OSATS to distinguish experience levels. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between means of scores between four groups stratified by previous experience in chest tube insertion (level 0: 22.1±3.2 vs. level 1: 26.8±2.8 vs. level 2: 35.4±2.2 vs. level 3: 41.0±2.0; p=0.002; p(1,3)=0.049, p(0,3)=0.005). However, if groups were stratified by formal professional level, no statistically significant distinction could be made using OSATS. Hence, the OSATS tool showed criterion validity for differentiation between experience levels. Conclusion: In the pilot study, the modified OSATS for chest tube insertion was apt to standardize expert rating and could be used to measure skill and to depict different experience levels. The OSATS will help facilitate training and assessment of chest drain insertion and could therefore improve surgical training for trauma situations. According to our data, the OSATS might be integrated into modern curricula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6278238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62782382018-12-11 Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion Friedrich, Mirco Ober, Julian Haubruck, Patrick Bergdolt, Christian Bruckner, Thomas Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich Kadmon, Martina Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter Tanner, Michael Christopher Nickel, Felix GMS J Med Educ Article Background: Chest tube insertion is a standard intervention for management of various injuries of the thorax. Efficient clinical training of this and similar bed-side procedures is equally demanded and improvable. Here, we propose a nouveau means of assessment and feedback using an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool. The modified OSATS for chest drain insertion is evaluated in a pilot trial focusing on chest drain insertion. Methods: Participants in the pilot trial were medical students (3(rd)-6(th) year of studies, n=9), junior residents (1(st)-3(rd) post-graduate year, n=12), senior residents (4(th)-6(th) post-graduate year, n=14), and attending surgeons (n=6) from Heidelberg University. Chest drain insertions on a cadaveric porcine model were rated by experts with the modified OSATS score. Participants’ performances were videotaped and subsequently rated by two remote experts (video rating). Primary aim was to assess criterion validity of the OSATS to distinguish experience levels. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences between means of scores between four groups stratified by previous experience in chest tube insertion (level 0: 22.1±3.2 vs. level 1: 26.8±2.8 vs. level 2: 35.4±2.2 vs. level 3: 41.0±2.0; p=0.002; p(1,3)=0.049, p(0,3)=0.005). However, if groups were stratified by formal professional level, no statistically significant distinction could be made using OSATS. Hence, the OSATS tool showed criterion validity for differentiation between experience levels. Conclusion: In the pilot study, the modified OSATS for chest tube insertion was apt to standardize expert rating and could be used to measure skill and to depict different experience levels. The OSATS will help facilitate training and assessment of chest drain insertion and could therefore improve surgical training for trauma situations. According to our data, the OSATS might be integrated into modern curricula. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6278238/ /pubmed/30539073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001194 Text en Copyright © 2018 Friedrich et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Friedrich, Mirco
Ober, Julian
Haubruck, Patrick
Bergdolt, Christian
Bruckner, Thomas
Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Kadmon, Martina
Müller-Stich, Beat-Peter
Tanner, Michael Christopher
Nickel, Felix
Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
title Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
title_full Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
title_fullStr Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
title_full_unstemmed Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
title_short Pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
title_sort pilot evaluation of an objective structured assessment of technical skills tool for chest tube insertion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30539073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001194
work_keys_str_mv AT friedrichmirco pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT oberjulian pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT haubruckpatrick pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT bergdoltchristian pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT brucknerthomas pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT kowalewskikarlfriedrich pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT kadmonmartina pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT mullerstichbeatpeter pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT tannermichaelchristopher pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion
AT nickelfelix pilotevaluationofanobjectivestructuredassessmentoftechnicalskillstoolforchesttubeinsertion