Cargando…

Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales

OBJECTIVES: Construct updated birth weight-for-gestational age centile charts for use in the UK and compare these to the currently used UK-WHO charts. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of national birth data. PARTICIPANTS: Centiles were constructed using 1 269 403 singleton births occurring in England and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norris, Tom, Seaton, Sarah E, Manktelow, Brad N, Baker, Philip N, Kurinczuk, Jennifer J, Field, David, Draper, Elizabeth S, Smith, Lucy K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29217694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313452
_version_ 1783378406446989312
author Norris, Tom
Seaton, Sarah E
Manktelow, Brad N
Baker, Philip N
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Field, David
Draper, Elizabeth S
Smith, Lucy K
author_facet Norris, Tom
Seaton, Sarah E
Manktelow, Brad N
Baker, Philip N
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Field, David
Draper, Elizabeth S
Smith, Lucy K
author_sort Norris, Tom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Construct updated birth weight-for-gestational age centile charts for use in the UK and compare these to the currently used UK-WHO charts. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of national birth data. PARTICIPANTS: Centiles were constructed using 1 269 403 singleton births occurring in England and Wales in 2013–2014 as part of the MBRRACE-UK national perinatal surveillance programme. These were then validated using 642 737 singleton births occurring in England and Wales in 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex-specific birth weight-for-gestational age centiles. Centiles were created using the lambda-mu-sigma method via the GAMLSS package in R. This method transforms the skewed birth weight distribution to approximate a normal distribution, allowing any birth weight centile to be produced. RESULTS: The new centiles performed well in the validation sample, with the observed and expected proportion of births below a given centile in agreement. Overall, driven by the predominance of term births, the UK-WHO charts classify a smaller proportion of infants as below a given centile. For example, the UK-WHO estimates classified only 1.32% (8035/606 430) of term infants born in 2015 as below the second centile, compared with 1.97% (11 975/606 430) using the new MBRRACE-UK centiles. At the earliest gestational ages, however, the opposite is observed, with the UK-WHO classifying a larger proportion of infants as below a given centile, particularly at the lower end of the birthweight distribution. CONCLUSIONS: We have constructed and validated updated birth weight-for-gestational age centiles using a contemporary sample of births occurring in England and Wales. The benefits of these updated centiles will be first to assist the national surveillance of perinatal mortality programme by improving the identification of the proportion of stillbirths and neonatal deaths affected by intrauterine growth restriction and, second, to aid clinicians by more accurately identifying babies who require increased monitoring in the period immediately following birth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6278652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62786522018-12-26 Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales Norris, Tom Seaton, Sarah E Manktelow, Brad N Baker, Philip N Kurinczuk, Jennifer J Field, David Draper, Elizabeth S Smith, Lucy K Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Original Article OBJECTIVES: Construct updated birth weight-for-gestational age centile charts for use in the UK and compare these to the currently used UK-WHO charts. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of national birth data. PARTICIPANTS: Centiles were constructed using 1 269 403 singleton births occurring in England and Wales in 2013–2014 as part of the MBRRACE-UK national perinatal surveillance programme. These were then validated using 642 737 singleton births occurring in England and Wales in 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sex-specific birth weight-for-gestational age centiles. Centiles were created using the lambda-mu-sigma method via the GAMLSS package in R. This method transforms the skewed birth weight distribution to approximate a normal distribution, allowing any birth weight centile to be produced. RESULTS: The new centiles performed well in the validation sample, with the observed and expected proportion of births below a given centile in agreement. Overall, driven by the predominance of term births, the UK-WHO charts classify a smaller proportion of infants as below a given centile. For example, the UK-WHO estimates classified only 1.32% (8035/606 430) of term infants born in 2015 as below the second centile, compared with 1.97% (11 975/606 430) using the new MBRRACE-UK centiles. At the earliest gestational ages, however, the opposite is observed, with the UK-WHO classifying a larger proportion of infants as below a given centile, particularly at the lower end of the birthweight distribution. CONCLUSIONS: We have constructed and validated updated birth weight-for-gestational age centiles using a contemporary sample of births occurring in England and Wales. The benefits of these updated centiles will be first to assist the national surveillance of perinatal mortality programme by improving the identification of the proportion of stillbirths and neonatal deaths affected by intrauterine growth restriction and, second, to aid clinicians by more accurately identifying babies who require increased monitoring in the period immediately following birth. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11 2017-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6278652/ /pubmed/29217694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313452 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Norris, Tom
Seaton, Sarah E
Manktelow, Brad N
Baker, Philip N
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J
Field, David
Draper, Elizabeth S
Smith, Lucy K
Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales
title Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales
title_full Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales
title_fullStr Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales
title_full_unstemmed Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales
title_short Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales
title_sort updated birth weight centiles for england and wales
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29217694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313452
work_keys_str_mv AT norristom updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT seatonsarahe updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT manktelowbradn updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT bakerphilipn updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT kurinczukjenniferj updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT fielddavid updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT draperelizabeths updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales
AT smithlucyk updatedbirthweightcentilesforenglandandwales