Cargando…

High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance

OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cancer services relating to the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in the community, where except in specific circumstances it is recommended that only low-risk BCCs should be excis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cole, Simon John, Howes, Rachel, Meehan, Chris, Cole, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023299
_version_ 1783378429186408448
author Cole, Simon John
Howes, Rachel
Meehan, Chris
Cole, Richard
author_facet Cole, Simon John
Howes, Rachel
Meehan, Chris
Cole, Richard
author_sort Cole, Simon John
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cancer services relating to the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in the community, where except in specific circumstances it is recommended that only low-risk BCCs should be excised routinely. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational study of the histopathology reports of BCC excisions received from primary care in two district general hospitals in the South of England. One hundred consecutive BCC excisions were analysed from each hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of high-risk BCCs excised in primary care according to histological subtype, anatomical site and age and if these excisions were compliant with NICE 2010 guidance. Completeness of excision and mention of BCC on histology request were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Histologically high-risk subtypes were present in 32% (64/200) of BCCs excised in the community. Only 17/64 were excised by general practitioners (GPs) who were accredited to do so. Non-compliance regarding anatomical site occurred in 16% of samples; only one was non-compliant regarding patient age. There was a high overall rate of complete excision (94.5%) with variation in presence of the term BCC on histology request forms. CONCLUSIONS: NICE 2010 guidance relating to BCC excision in primary care was not followed in a considerable number of cases. Compliance with NICE 2010 guidance depends on the ability to recognise high-risk BCCs clinically and manage appropriately. It also shows that despite close supervision by secondary care, there are still failures of compliance. GP training in identification of subtypes of BCC might be improved, as well as an increase in numbers of GPs accredited to carry out high-risk BCC excisions. Difficulty in diagnosing high-risk histological subtypes of BCC preoperatively should be considered in any future revision of NICE guidance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6278784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62787842018-12-11 High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance Cole, Simon John Howes, Rachel Meehan, Chris Cole, Richard BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cancer services relating to the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in the community, where except in specific circumstances it is recommended that only low-risk BCCs should be excised routinely. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational study of the histopathology reports of BCC excisions received from primary care in two district general hospitals in the South of England. One hundred consecutive BCC excisions were analysed from each hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of high-risk BCCs excised in primary care according to histological subtype, anatomical site and age and if these excisions were compliant with NICE 2010 guidance. Completeness of excision and mention of BCC on histology request were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Histologically high-risk subtypes were present in 32% (64/200) of BCCs excised in the community. Only 17/64 were excised by general practitioners (GPs) who were accredited to do so. Non-compliance regarding anatomical site occurred in 16% of samples; only one was non-compliant regarding patient age. There was a high overall rate of complete excision (94.5%) with variation in presence of the term BCC on histology request forms. CONCLUSIONS: NICE 2010 guidance relating to BCC excision in primary care was not followed in a considerable number of cases. Compliance with NICE 2010 guidance depends on the ability to recognise high-risk BCCs clinically and manage appropriately. It also shows that despite close supervision by secondary care, there are still failures of compliance. GP training in identification of subtypes of BCC might be improved, as well as an increase in numbers of GPs accredited to carry out high-risk BCC excisions. Difficulty in diagnosing high-risk histological subtypes of BCC preoperatively should be considered in any future revision of NICE guidance. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6278784/ /pubmed/30798290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023299 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Cole, Simon John
Howes, Rachel
Meehan, Chris
Cole, Richard
High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
title High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
title_full High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
title_fullStr High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
title_full_unstemmed High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
title_short High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
title_sort high-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with nice guidance
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023299
work_keys_str_mv AT colesimonjohn highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance
AT howesrachel highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance
AT meehanchris highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance
AT colerichard highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance