Cargando…
High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance
OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cancer services relating to the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in the community, where except in specific circumstances it is recommended that only low-risk BCCs should be excis...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023299 |
_version_ | 1783378429186408448 |
---|---|
author | Cole, Simon John Howes, Rachel Meehan, Chris Cole, Richard |
author_facet | Cole, Simon John Howes, Rachel Meehan, Chris Cole, Richard |
author_sort | Cole, Simon John |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cancer services relating to the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in the community, where except in specific circumstances it is recommended that only low-risk BCCs should be excised routinely. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational study of the histopathology reports of BCC excisions received from primary care in two district general hospitals in the South of England. One hundred consecutive BCC excisions were analysed from each hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of high-risk BCCs excised in primary care according to histological subtype, anatomical site and age and if these excisions were compliant with NICE 2010 guidance. Completeness of excision and mention of BCC on histology request were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Histologically high-risk subtypes were present in 32% (64/200) of BCCs excised in the community. Only 17/64 were excised by general practitioners (GPs) who were accredited to do so. Non-compliance regarding anatomical site occurred in 16% of samples; only one was non-compliant regarding patient age. There was a high overall rate of complete excision (94.5%) with variation in presence of the term BCC on histology request forms. CONCLUSIONS: NICE 2010 guidance relating to BCC excision in primary care was not followed in a considerable number of cases. Compliance with NICE 2010 guidance depends on the ability to recognise high-risk BCCs clinically and manage appropriately. It also shows that despite close supervision by secondary care, there are still failures of compliance. GP training in identification of subtypes of BCC might be improved, as well as an increase in numbers of GPs accredited to carry out high-risk BCC excisions. Difficulty in diagnosing high-risk histological subtypes of BCC preoperatively should be considered in any future revision of NICE guidance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6278784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62787842018-12-11 High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance Cole, Simon John Howes, Rachel Meehan, Chris Cole, Richard BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: To assess compliance with 2010 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on cancer services relating to the management of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) in the community, where except in specific circumstances it is recommended that only low-risk BCCs should be excised routinely. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective observational study of the histopathology reports of BCC excisions received from primary care in two district general hospitals in the South of England. One hundred consecutive BCC excisions were analysed from each hospital. OUTCOME MEASURES: The numbers of high-risk BCCs excised in primary care according to histological subtype, anatomical site and age and if these excisions were compliant with NICE 2010 guidance. Completeness of excision and mention of BCC on histology request were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Histologically high-risk subtypes were present in 32% (64/200) of BCCs excised in the community. Only 17/64 were excised by general practitioners (GPs) who were accredited to do so. Non-compliance regarding anatomical site occurred in 16% of samples; only one was non-compliant regarding patient age. There was a high overall rate of complete excision (94.5%) with variation in presence of the term BCC on histology request forms. CONCLUSIONS: NICE 2010 guidance relating to BCC excision in primary care was not followed in a considerable number of cases. Compliance with NICE 2010 guidance depends on the ability to recognise high-risk BCCs clinically and manage appropriately. It also shows that despite close supervision by secondary care, there are still failures of compliance. GP training in identification of subtypes of BCC might be improved, as well as an increase in numbers of GPs accredited to carry out high-risk BCC excisions. Difficulty in diagnosing high-risk histological subtypes of BCC preoperatively should be considered in any future revision of NICE guidance. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6278784/ /pubmed/30798290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023299 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Cole, Simon John Howes, Rachel Meehan, Chris Cole, Richard High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance |
title | High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance |
title_full | High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance |
title_fullStr | High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance |
title_full_unstemmed | High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance |
title_short | High-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with NICE guidance |
title_sort | high-risk basal cell carcinoma excision in primary care: a retrospective observational study of compliance with nice guidance |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278784/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023299 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colesimonjohn highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance AT howesrachel highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance AT meehanchris highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance AT colerichard highriskbasalcellcarcinomaexcisioninprimarycarearetrospectiveobservationalstudyofcompliancewithniceguidance |