Cargando…

Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)

INTRODUCTION: Clinical indicators are used to measure and quantify the safety and quality of patient care. They are also often used as endpoints in clinical trials. Definitions of clinical indicators in common use are extremely heterogeneous, limiting their applicability. As part of the internationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bampoe, Sohail, Cook, Tim, Fleisher, Lee, Grocott, Michael P W, Neuman, Mark, Story, David, Myles, Paul, Haller, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427
_version_ 1783378431253151744
author Bampoe, Sohail
Cook, Tim
Fleisher, Lee
Grocott, Michael P W
Neuman, Mark
Story, David
Myles, Paul
Haller, Guy
author_facet Bampoe, Sohail
Cook, Tim
Fleisher, Lee
Grocott, Michael P W
Neuman, Mark
Story, David
Myles, Paul
Haller, Guy
author_sort Bampoe, Sohail
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical indicators are used to measure and quantify the safety and quality of patient care. They are also often used as endpoints in clinical trials. Definitions of clinical indicators in common use are extremely heterogeneous, limiting their applicability. As part of the international Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative, this study will identify clinical indicators by systematically reviewing the anaesthesia and perioperative medicine literature, and will provide consensus, clinically useful definitions for those indicators using a Delphi process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An electronic database search will be conducted of Medline (PubMed/OVID), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library in order to meet this review’s objectives that are: (1) To identify clinical indicators and their definitions used in randomised controlled trials that assess patient-related quality and safety interventions in perioperative medicine; (2) To select a shortlist of recommended indicators and definitions that are the most suitable for evaluation of quality and safety interventions following an expert-based consensus-gaining process (Delphi method) and (3) To provide a classification scale for each indicator related to its clarity of definition, validity (strength), reliability, feasibility (ease of use) and frequency of use. This systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review and Delphi process. The results of this study will be disseminated to the anaesthesia and perioperative medicine clinical and academic community through national and international presentations and through publication in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016042102.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6278793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62787932018-12-11 Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP) Bampoe, Sohail Cook, Tim Fleisher, Lee Grocott, Michael P W Neuman, Mark Story, David Myles, Paul Haller, Guy BMJ Open Anaesthesia INTRODUCTION: Clinical indicators are used to measure and quantify the safety and quality of patient care. They are also often used as endpoints in clinical trials. Definitions of clinical indicators in common use are extremely heterogeneous, limiting their applicability. As part of the international Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine initiative, this study will identify clinical indicators by systematically reviewing the anaesthesia and perioperative medicine literature, and will provide consensus, clinically useful definitions for those indicators using a Delphi process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An electronic database search will be conducted of Medline (PubMed/OVID), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library in order to meet this review’s objectives that are: (1) To identify clinical indicators and their definitions used in randomised controlled trials that assess patient-related quality and safety interventions in perioperative medicine; (2) To select a shortlist of recommended indicators and definitions that are the most suitable for evaluation of quality and safety interventions following an expert-based consensus-gaining process (Delphi method) and (3) To provide a classification scale for each indicator related to its clarity of definition, validity (strength), reliability, feasibility (ease of use) and frequency of use. This systematic review protocol is reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review and Delphi process. The results of this study will be disseminated to the anaesthesia and perioperative medicine clinical and academic community through national and international presentations and through publication in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016042102. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6278793/ /pubmed/30798291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Anaesthesia
Bampoe, Sohail
Cook, Tim
Fleisher, Lee
Grocott, Michael P W
Neuman, Mark
Story, David
Myles, Paul
Haller, Guy
Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
title Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
title_full Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
title_fullStr Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
title_full_unstemmed Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
title_short Clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and Delphi consensus process as part of the international Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine initiative (StEP)
title_sort clinical indicators for reporting the effectiveness of patient quality and safety-related interventions: a protocol of a systematic review and delphi consensus process as part of the international standardised endpoints for perioperative medicine initiative (step)
topic Anaesthesia
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30798291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427
work_keys_str_mv AT bampoesohail clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT cooktim clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT fleisherlee clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT grocottmichaelpw clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT neumanmark clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT storydavid clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT mylespaul clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep
AT hallerguy clinicalindicatorsforreportingtheeffectivenessofpatientqualityandsafetyrelatedinterventionsaprotocolofasystematicreviewanddelphiconsensusprocessaspartoftheinternationalstandardisedendpointsforperioperativemedicineinitiativestep