Cargando…

Exploring variation in how ambulance services address non-conveyance: a qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVES: There is considerable variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England. The aim was to explore variation in how each ambulance service addressed non-conveyance for calls ending in telephone advice and discharge at scene. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study. SETTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knowles, Emma, Bishop-Edwards, Lindsey, O’Cathain, Alicia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6278803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024228
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: There is considerable variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England. The aim was to explore variation in how each ambulance service addressed non-conveyance for calls ending in telephone advice and discharge at scene. DESIGN: A qualitative interview study. SETTING: Ten large regional ambulance services covering 99% of the population in England. PARTICIPANTS: Between four and seven interviewees from each ambulance service including managers, paramedics and healthcare commissioners, totalling 49 interviews. METHODS: Telephone semistructured interviews. RESULTS: The way interviewees in each ambulance service discussed non-conveyance within their organisation varied for three broad themes. First, ambulance service senior management appeared to set the culture around non-conveyance within an organisation, viewing it either as an opportunity or as a risky endeavour. Although motivation levels to undertake non-conveyance did not appear to be directly affected by the stability of an ambulance service in terms of continuity of leadership and externally assessed quality, this stability could affect the ability of the organisation to innovate to increase non-conveyance rates. Second, descriptions of workforce configuration differed between ambulance services, as well as how this workforce was used, trained and valued. Third, interviewees in each ambulance service described health and social care in the wider emergency and urgent care system differently in terms of availability of services that could facilitate non-conveyance, the amount of collaborative working between health and social care services and the ambulance service and complexity related to the numbers of services and healthcare commissioners with whom they had to work. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that factors within and outside the control of ambulance services may contribute to variation in non-conveyance rates. These findings can be tested in a quantitative analysis of factors affecting variation in non-conveyance rates between ambulance services in England.