Cargando…

Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes in severely obese (body mass index (BMI)>35kg/m(2)) women and other women admitted to alongside (co-located) midwifery units (AMU) in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We carried out a national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UK...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rowe, Rachel, Knight, Marian, Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208041
_version_ 1783378464702726144
author Rowe, Rachel
Knight, Marian
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
author_facet Rowe, Rachel
Knight, Marian
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
author_sort Rowe, Rachel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes in severely obese (body mass index (BMI)>35kg/m(2)) women and other women admitted to alongside (co-located) midwifery units (AMU) in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We carried out a national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) in all 122 AMUs in the UK. We identified and collected data about 1122 severely obese women admitted to an AMU, 1(st) January-31(st) December 2016, and 1949 comparison women (BMI≤35kg/m(2)), matched on time of admission, and used Poisson regression to calculate relative risks adjusted for maternal characteristics. RESULTS: 92% of the severely obese cohort had BMI 35.1-40kg/m(2). Severely obese multiparous women were no more likely than comparison women to experience the composite primary outcome (one or more of: augmentation, instrumental birth, Caesarean, maternal blood transfusion, 3rd/4th degree tear, maternal admission to higher level care) (5.6% vs. 8.1%, aRR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.07). For severely obese nulliparous women we found a non-significant 14% increased risk of the primary outcome (37.6% vs 34.8%, aRR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.97–1.33). High proportions of severely obese women had a ‘straightforward vaginal birth’ (nulliparous 67.9%; multiparous 96.3%). Severely obese women were more likely than comparison women to have an intrapartum Casearean section, but Caesarean section rates were low and the absolute difference small (4.7% vs 4.1%; aRR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02–2.57). In nulliparous women, severely obese women were more likely to have an urgent Caesarean section (12.2% vs. 6.5%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.08), or a PPH≥1500ml (5.1% vs. 1.7%, aRR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.24–7.31). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of significantly increased risk associated with planning birth in an AMU for carefully selected multiparous severely obese women, with BMI 35.1-40kg/m(2). Severely obese nulliparous women have a potential increased risk of having a more urgent Caesarean section or severe PPH compared with other women admitted to AMUs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6279017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62790172018-12-20 Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) Rowe, Rachel Knight, Marian Kurinczuk, Jennifer J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare outcomes in severely obese (body mass index (BMI)>35kg/m(2)) women and other women admitted to alongside (co-located) midwifery units (AMU) in the United Kingdom. METHODS: We carried out a national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS) in all 122 AMUs in the UK. We identified and collected data about 1122 severely obese women admitted to an AMU, 1(st) January-31(st) December 2016, and 1949 comparison women (BMI≤35kg/m(2)), matched on time of admission, and used Poisson regression to calculate relative risks adjusted for maternal characteristics. RESULTS: 92% of the severely obese cohort had BMI 35.1-40kg/m(2). Severely obese multiparous women were no more likely than comparison women to experience the composite primary outcome (one or more of: augmentation, instrumental birth, Caesarean, maternal blood transfusion, 3rd/4th degree tear, maternal admission to higher level care) (5.6% vs. 8.1%, aRR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.44–1.07). For severely obese nulliparous women we found a non-significant 14% increased risk of the primary outcome (37.6% vs 34.8%, aRR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.97–1.33). High proportions of severely obese women had a ‘straightforward vaginal birth’ (nulliparous 67.9%; multiparous 96.3%). Severely obese women were more likely than comparison women to have an intrapartum Casearean section, but Caesarean section rates were low and the absolute difference small (4.7% vs 4.1%; aRR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.02–2.57). In nulliparous women, severely obese women were more likely to have an urgent Caesarean section (12.2% vs. 6.5%, aRR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.05–3.08), or a PPH≥1500ml (5.1% vs. 1.7%, aRR = 3.01, 95% CI 1.24–7.31). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of significantly increased risk associated with planning birth in an AMU for carefully selected multiparous severely obese women, with BMI 35.1-40kg/m(2). Severely obese nulliparous women have a potential increased risk of having a more urgent Caesarean section or severe PPH compared with other women admitted to AMUs. Public Library of Science 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6279017/ /pubmed/30513088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208041 Text en © 2018 Rowe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rowe, Rachel
Knight, Marian
Kurinczuk, Jennifer J.
Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
title Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
title_full Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
title_fullStr Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
title_short Outcomes for women with BMI>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the UK: A national prospective cohort study using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS)
title_sort outcomes for women with bmi>35kg/m(2) admitted for labour care to alongside midwifery units in the uk: a national prospective cohort study using the uk midwifery study system (ukmidss)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208041
work_keys_str_mv AT rowerachel outcomesforwomenwithbmi35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss
AT knightmarian outcomesforwomenwithbmi35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss
AT kurinczukjenniferj outcomesforwomenwithbmi35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss
AT outcomesforwomenwithbmi35kgm2admittedforlabourcaretoalongsidemidwiferyunitsintheukanationalprospectivecohortstudyusingtheukmidwiferystudysystemukmidss