Cargando…

Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components

BACKGROUND: The aim of our research work was to investigate the relative potencies of matrix components of tylosin, a multi-component antibiotic, and establishing a quantitative relationship between content and potency of each component. METHODS: The potencies of tylosin matrix components were deter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamidian, Khadijeh, Amini, Mohsen, Samadi, Nasrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40199-018-0220-6
_version_ 1783378511444049920
author Hamidian, Khadijeh
Amini, Mohsen
Samadi, Nasrin
author_facet Hamidian, Khadijeh
Amini, Mohsen
Samadi, Nasrin
author_sort Hamidian, Khadijeh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of our research work was to investigate the relative potencies of matrix components of tylosin, a multi-component antibiotic, and establishing a quantitative relationship between content and potency of each component. METHODS: The potencies of tylosin matrix components were determined by using three bioassay methods. The content of tylosin components (tylosin A, B, C, and D) in different tylosin samples were determined by using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique and their theoretical potencies were calculated. Equivalency of theoretical and microbiological potencies for each sample was evaluated using statistical analysis. RESULTS: The highest amount of tylosin B content was found in tylosin phosphate and tartrate (up to 19%). Tylosin D content in all tylosin samples varied in the range of 0.03 to 18.73%. Tylosin A, B, and C showed similar sensitivity to the Kocuria rhizophila, the test organism in agar-diffusion method, while the potency of tylosin D was 39% of A. In the turbidimetric methods by Staphylococcus aureus, tylosin D and B responses to A component were ranged from 22.5 to 22.8% and 77.3 to 79.3%, respectively, while potencies of tylosin C and A were almost equal. The biopotency conversion factors were not resulted to a single factor, due to the different antibacterial activity of tylosin components. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that defining individual limit for the low active matrix components and for the total of other components with similar high activity could improve the accuracy of potency results. [Figure: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6279661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62796612019-10-25 Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components Hamidian, Khadijeh Amini, Mohsen Samadi, Nasrin Daru Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of our research work was to investigate the relative potencies of matrix components of tylosin, a multi-component antibiotic, and establishing a quantitative relationship between content and potency of each component. METHODS: The potencies of tylosin matrix components were determined by using three bioassay methods. The content of tylosin components (tylosin A, B, C, and D) in different tylosin samples were determined by using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique and their theoretical potencies were calculated. Equivalency of theoretical and microbiological potencies for each sample was evaluated using statistical analysis. RESULTS: The highest amount of tylosin B content was found in tylosin phosphate and tartrate (up to 19%). Tylosin D content in all tylosin samples varied in the range of 0.03 to 18.73%. Tylosin A, B, and C showed similar sensitivity to the Kocuria rhizophila, the test organism in agar-diffusion method, while the potency of tylosin D was 39% of A. In the turbidimetric methods by Staphylococcus aureus, tylosin D and B responses to A component were ranged from 22.5 to 22.8% and 77.3 to 79.3%, respectively, while potencies of tylosin C and A were almost equal. The biopotency conversion factors were not resulted to a single factor, due to the different antibacterial activity of tylosin components. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that defining individual limit for the low active matrix components and for the total of other components with similar high activity could improve the accuracy of potency results. [Figure: see text] Springer International Publishing 2018-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6279661/ /pubmed/30361888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40199-018-0220-6 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018
spellingShingle Research Article
Hamidian, Khadijeh
Amini, Mohsen
Samadi, Nasrin
Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
title Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
title_full Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
title_fullStr Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
title_full_unstemmed Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
title_short Consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
title_sort consistency evaluation between matrix components ratio and microbiological potency of tylosin major components
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30361888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40199-018-0220-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hamidiankhadijeh consistencyevaluationbetweenmatrixcomponentsratioandmicrobiologicalpotencyoftylosinmajorcomponents
AT aminimohsen consistencyevaluationbetweenmatrixcomponentsratioandmicrobiologicalpotencyoftylosinmajorcomponents
AT samadinasrin consistencyevaluationbetweenmatrixcomponentsratioandmicrobiologicalpotencyoftylosinmajorcomponents