Cargando…

Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke

[Purpose] The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a comprehensive assessment tool, although it is not confined for use in stroke patients. This study aimed to determine the structural validity of the BESTest in self-ambulatory patients with stroke using both factor and Rasch analyses. [Part...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyata, Kazuhiro, Hasegawa, Satoshi, Iwamoto, Hiroki, Otani, Tomohiro, Kaizu, Yoichi, Shinohara, Tomoyuki, Usuda, Shigeru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1446
_version_ 1783378516859944960
author Miyata, Kazuhiro
Hasegawa, Satoshi
Iwamoto, Hiroki
Otani, Tomohiro
Kaizu, Yoichi
Shinohara, Tomoyuki
Usuda, Shigeru
author_facet Miyata, Kazuhiro
Hasegawa, Satoshi
Iwamoto, Hiroki
Otani, Tomohiro
Kaizu, Yoichi
Shinohara, Tomoyuki
Usuda, Shigeru
author_sort Miyata, Kazuhiro
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a comprehensive assessment tool, although it is not confined for use in stroke patients. This study aimed to determine the structural validity of the BESTest in self-ambulatory patients with stroke using both factor and Rasch analyses. [Participants and Methods] This retrospective study included 140 self-ambulatory patients with stroke. The structural validity of the BESTest was analyzed according to principal component, exploratory factor, Rasch, confirmatory factor, and correlation analyses. [Results] The analytical results supported a four-factor model comprising 25 items. The four factors included dynamic postural control with gait, static postural control, stepping reaction, and stability limits in sitting. Evidence of high structural validity and reliable internal consistency suggested that the 25-item BESTest is valid and reliable. Each factor was significantly correlated with lower extremity motor function and walking ability. [Conclusion] Eleven items in the BESTest were poorly correlated, and the remaining 25 items were grouped into four factors that demonstrated good structural validity for patients with stroke. Further studies should validate the applicability of the 25-item BESTest four-factor model in a larger sample of patients with stroke in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6279694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62796942018-12-19 Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke Miyata, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Satoshi Iwamoto, Hiroki Otani, Tomohiro Kaizu, Yoichi Shinohara, Tomoyuki Usuda, Shigeru J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a comprehensive assessment tool, although it is not confined for use in stroke patients. This study aimed to determine the structural validity of the BESTest in self-ambulatory patients with stroke using both factor and Rasch analyses. [Participants and Methods] This retrospective study included 140 self-ambulatory patients with stroke. The structural validity of the BESTest was analyzed according to principal component, exploratory factor, Rasch, confirmatory factor, and correlation analyses. [Results] The analytical results supported a four-factor model comprising 25 items. The four factors included dynamic postural control with gait, static postural control, stepping reaction, and stability limits in sitting. Evidence of high structural validity and reliable internal consistency suggested that the 25-item BESTest is valid and reliable. Each factor was significantly correlated with lower extremity motor function and walking ability. [Conclusion] Eleven items in the BESTest were poorly correlated, and the remaining 25 items were grouped into four factors that demonstrated good structural validity for patients with stroke. Further studies should validate the applicability of the 25-item BESTest four-factor model in a larger sample of patients with stroke in a clinical setting. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2018-11-21 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6279694/ /pubmed/30568332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1446 Text en 2018©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science. Published by IPEC Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Miyata, Kazuhiro
Hasegawa, Satoshi
Iwamoto, Hiroki
Otani, Tomohiro
Kaizu, Yoichi
Shinohara, Tomoyuki
Usuda, Shigeru
Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke
title Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke
title_full Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke
title_fullStr Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke
title_full_unstemmed Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke
title_short Structural validity of Balance Evaluation Systems Test assessed using factor and Rasch analyses in patients with stroke
title_sort structural validity of balance evaluation systems test assessed using factor and rasch analyses in patients with stroke
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6279694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30568332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.30.1446
work_keys_str_mv AT miyatakazuhiro structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke
AT hasegawasatoshi structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke
AT iwamotohiroki structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke
AT otanitomohiro structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke
AT kaizuyoichi structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke
AT shinoharatomoyuki structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke
AT usudashigeru structuralvalidityofbalanceevaluationsystemstestassessedusingfactorandraschanalysesinpatientswithstroke