Cargando…
Cranioplasty Using Autologous Bone versus Porous Polyethylene versus Custom-Made Titanium Mesh : A Retrospective Review of 108 Patients
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cosmetic outcome and complications after cranioplasty (CP) due to three different implant materials, and analyze the mean implant survival and cumulative survival rate based on these results. METHODS: We reviewed 108 patients retrospectively wh...
Autores principales: | Kim, Jun-Ki, Lee, Sang-Bok, Yang, Seo-Yeon |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Neurosurgical Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30396247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0047 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh
por: Policicchio, Domenico, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Feasibility of the custom-made titanium cranioplasty CRANIOTOP(®)
por: Höhne, Julius, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Three dimensional custom-made PEEK cranioplasty
por: Hosameldin, Ahmed, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Titanium Versus Autologous Bone-Based Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Capitelli-McMahon, Helen, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Use of “custom made” porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patients
por: Stefini, Roberto, et al.
Publicado: (2013)