Cargando…

Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corrido...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Chunneng, Xu, Zhengkuan, Li, Fangcai, Chen, Qixin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurosurgical Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0296
_version_ 1783378592162381824
author Huang, Chunneng
Xu, Zhengkuan
Li, Fangcai
Chen, Qixin
author_facet Huang, Chunneng
Xu, Zhengkuan
Li, Fangcai
Chen, Qixin
author_sort Huang, Chunneng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corridor were simulated at different access angles and the potential risk of neurovascular structure injury was evaluated when the access corridor touching or overlapping the corresponding structures at each angle. Furthermore, the safe corridor length was measured when the corridor width was 18 and 22 mm. RESULTS: When access angle was 0°, the potential risk of ipsilateral nerve roots injury was 54.7% at L4–L5. When access angle was 45°, the potential risk of abdominal aorta, contralateral nerve roots or central canal injury at L4–L5 was 79.1%, 74.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The length of the 18 mm-wide access corridor was largest at 0° and it could reach 44.5 mm at L3–L4 and 46.4 mm at L4–L5. While the length of the 22 mm-wide access corridor was 42.3 mm at L3–L4 and 44.1 mm at L4–L5 at 0°. CONCLUSION: Changes in the access angle would not only affect the ipsilateral neurovascular structures, but also might adversely influence the contralateral neural elements. It should be also noted to surgeons that alteration of the access angle changed the corridor length.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6280061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62800612018-12-10 Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study Huang, Chunneng Xu, Zhengkuan Li, Fangcai Chen, Qixin J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corridor were simulated at different access angles and the potential risk of neurovascular structure injury was evaluated when the access corridor touching or overlapping the corresponding structures at each angle. Furthermore, the safe corridor length was measured when the corridor width was 18 and 22 mm. RESULTS: When access angle was 0°, the potential risk of ipsilateral nerve roots injury was 54.7% at L4–L5. When access angle was 45°, the potential risk of abdominal aorta, contralateral nerve roots or central canal injury at L4–L5 was 79.1%, 74.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The length of the 18 mm-wide access corridor was largest at 0° and it could reach 44.5 mm at L3–L4 and 46.4 mm at L4–L5. While the length of the 22 mm-wide access corridor was 42.3 mm at L3–L4 and 44.1 mm at L4–L5 at 0°. CONCLUSION: Changes in the access angle would not only affect the ipsilateral neurovascular structures, but also might adversely influence the contralateral neural elements. It should be also noted to surgeons that alteration of the access angle changed the corridor length. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2018-11 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6280061/ /pubmed/29940723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0296 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Neurosurgical Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Huang, Chunneng
Xu, Zhengkuan
Li, Fangcai
Chen, Qixin
Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
title Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
title_full Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
title_fullStr Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
title_full_unstemmed Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
title_short Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
title_sort does the access angle change the risk of approach-related complications in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion? an mri study
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940723
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0296
work_keys_str_mv AT huangchunneng doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy
AT xuzhengkuan doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy
AT lifangcai doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy
AT chenqixin doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy