Cargando…
Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corrido...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Neurosurgical Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0296 |
_version_ | 1783378592162381824 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Chunneng Xu, Zhengkuan Li, Fangcai Chen, Qixin |
author_facet | Huang, Chunneng Xu, Zhengkuan Li, Fangcai Chen, Qixin |
author_sort | Huang, Chunneng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corridor were simulated at different access angles and the potential risk of neurovascular structure injury was evaluated when the access corridor touching or overlapping the corresponding structures at each angle. Furthermore, the safe corridor length was measured when the corridor width was 18 and 22 mm. RESULTS: When access angle was 0°, the potential risk of ipsilateral nerve roots injury was 54.7% at L4–L5. When access angle was 45°, the potential risk of abdominal aorta, contralateral nerve roots or central canal injury at L4–L5 was 79.1%, 74.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The length of the 18 mm-wide access corridor was largest at 0° and it could reach 44.5 mm at L3–L4 and 46.4 mm at L4–L5. While the length of the 22 mm-wide access corridor was 42.3 mm at L3–L4 and 44.1 mm at L4–L5 at 0°. CONCLUSION: Changes in the access angle would not only affect the ipsilateral neurovascular structures, but also might adversely influence the contralateral neural elements. It should be also noted to surgeons that alteration of the access angle changed the corridor length. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6280061 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62800612018-12-10 Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study Huang, Chunneng Xu, Zhengkuan Li, Fangcai Chen, Qixin J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential risk of approach-related complications at different access angles in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. METHODS: Eighty-six axial magnetic resonance images were obtained to analyze the risk of approach-related complications. The access corridor were simulated at different access angles and the potential risk of neurovascular structure injury was evaluated when the access corridor touching or overlapping the corresponding structures at each angle. Furthermore, the safe corridor length was measured when the corridor width was 18 and 22 mm. RESULTS: When access angle was 0°, the potential risk of ipsilateral nerve roots injury was 54.7% at L4–L5. When access angle was 45°, the potential risk of abdominal aorta, contralateral nerve roots or central canal injury at L4–L5 was 79.1%, 74.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The length of the 18 mm-wide access corridor was largest at 0° and it could reach 44.5 mm at L3–L4 and 46.4 mm at L4–L5. While the length of the 22 mm-wide access corridor was 42.3 mm at L3–L4 and 44.1 mm at L4–L5 at 0°. CONCLUSION: Changes in the access angle would not only affect the ipsilateral neurovascular structures, but also might adversely influence the contralateral neural elements. It should be also noted to surgeons that alteration of the access angle changed the corridor length. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2018-11 2018-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6280061/ /pubmed/29940723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0296 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Neurosurgical Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Article Huang, Chunneng Xu, Zhengkuan Li, Fangcai Chen, Qixin Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study |
title | Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study |
title_full | Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study |
title_fullStr | Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study |
title_short | Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study |
title_sort | does the access angle change the risk of approach-related complications in minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion? an mri study |
topic | Clinical Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280061/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29940723 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0296 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangchunneng doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy AT xuzhengkuan doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy AT lifangcai doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy AT chenqixin doestheaccessanglechangetheriskofapproachrelatedcomplicationsinminimallyinvasivelaterallumbarinterbodyfusionanmristudy |