Cargando…
A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
Network scale-up is an indirect size estimation method, in which participants are questioned on sensitive behaviors of their social network members. Therefore, the visibility of the behavior affects the replies and estimates. Many attempts to estimate visibility have been made. The aims of this stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Epidemiology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121969 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018041 |
_version_ | 1783378594062401536 |
---|---|
author | Haghdoost, Aliakbar Ahmadi Gohari, Milad Mirzazadeh, Ali Zolala, Farzaneh Baneshi, Mohammad Reza |
author_facet | Haghdoost, Aliakbar Ahmadi Gohari, Milad Mirzazadeh, Ali Zolala, Farzaneh Baneshi, Mohammad Reza |
author_sort | Haghdoost, Aliakbar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Network scale-up is an indirect size estimation method, in which participants are questioned on sensitive behaviors of their social network members. Therefore, the visibility of the behavior affects the replies and estimates. Many attempts to estimate visibility have been made. The aims of this study were to review the main methods used to address visibility and to provide a summary of reported visibility factors (VFs) across populations. We systematically searched relevant databases and Google. In total, 15 studies and reports that calculated VFs were found. VF calculation studies have been applied in 9 countries, mostly in East Asia and Eastern Europe. The methods applied were expert opinion, comparison of NSU with another method, the game of contacts, social respect, and the coming-out rate. The VF has been calculated for heavy drug users, people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients, male who have sex with male (MSM), alcohol and methamphetamine users, and those who have experienced extra-/pre-marital sex and abortion. The VF varied from 1.4% in Japan to 52.0% in China for MSM; from 34.0% in Ukraine to 111.0% in China for FSWs; and from 12.0% among Iranian students to 57.0% in Ukraine for PWID. Our review revealed that VF estimates were heterogeneous, and were not available for most settings, in particular the Middle East and North Africa region, except Iran. More concrete methodologies to estimate the VF are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6280069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Epidemiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62800692018-12-13 A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies Haghdoost, Aliakbar Ahmadi Gohari, Milad Mirzazadeh, Ali Zolala, Farzaneh Baneshi, Mohammad Reza Epidemiol Health Review Article Network scale-up is an indirect size estimation method, in which participants are questioned on sensitive behaviors of their social network members. Therefore, the visibility of the behavior affects the replies and estimates. Many attempts to estimate visibility have been made. The aims of this study were to review the main methods used to address visibility and to provide a summary of reported visibility factors (VFs) across populations. We systematically searched relevant databases and Google. In total, 15 studies and reports that calculated VFs were found. VF calculation studies have been applied in 9 countries, mostly in East Asia and Eastern Europe. The methods applied were expert opinion, comparison of NSU with another method, the game of contacts, social respect, and the coming-out rate. The VF has been calculated for heavy drug users, people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients, male who have sex with male (MSM), alcohol and methamphetamine users, and those who have experienced extra-/pre-marital sex and abortion. The VF varied from 1.4% in Japan to 52.0% in China for MSM; from 34.0% in Ukraine to 111.0% in China for FSWs; and from 12.0% among Iranian students to 57.0% in Ukraine for PWID. Our review revealed that VF estimates were heterogeneous, and were not available for most settings, in particular the Middle East and North Africa region, except Iran. More concrete methodologies to estimate the VF are required. Korean Society of Epidemiology 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6280069/ /pubmed/30121969 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018041 Text en ©2018, Korean Society of Epidemiology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Haghdoost, Aliakbar Ahmadi Gohari, Milad Mirzazadeh, Ali Zolala, Farzaneh Baneshi, Mohammad Reza A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
title | A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
title_full | A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
title_fullStr | A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
title_full_unstemmed | A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
title_short | A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
title_sort | review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280069/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121969 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haghdoostaliakbar areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT ahmadigoharimilad areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT mirzazadehali areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT zolalafarzaneh areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT baneshimohammadreza areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT haghdoostaliakbar reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT ahmadigoharimilad reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT mirzazadehali reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT zolalafarzaneh reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies AT baneshimohammadreza reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies |