Cargando…

A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies

Network scale-up is an indirect size estimation method, in which participants are questioned on sensitive behaviors of their social network members. Therefore, the visibility of the behavior affects the replies and estimates. Many attempts to estimate visibility have been made. The aims of this stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haghdoost, Aliakbar, Ahmadi Gohari, Milad, Mirzazadeh, Ali, Zolala, Farzaneh, Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Epidemiology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121969
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018041
_version_ 1783378594062401536
author Haghdoost, Aliakbar
Ahmadi Gohari, Milad
Mirzazadeh, Ali
Zolala, Farzaneh
Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
author_facet Haghdoost, Aliakbar
Ahmadi Gohari, Milad
Mirzazadeh, Ali
Zolala, Farzaneh
Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
author_sort Haghdoost, Aliakbar
collection PubMed
description Network scale-up is an indirect size estimation method, in which participants are questioned on sensitive behaviors of their social network members. Therefore, the visibility of the behavior affects the replies and estimates. Many attempts to estimate visibility have been made. The aims of this study were to review the main methods used to address visibility and to provide a summary of reported visibility factors (VFs) across populations. We systematically searched relevant databases and Google. In total, 15 studies and reports that calculated VFs were found. VF calculation studies have been applied in 9 countries, mostly in East Asia and Eastern Europe. The methods applied were expert opinion, comparison of NSU with another method, the game of contacts, social respect, and the coming-out rate. The VF has been calculated for heavy drug users, people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients, male who have sex with male (MSM), alcohol and methamphetamine users, and those who have experienced extra-/pre-marital sex and abortion. The VF varied from 1.4% in Japan to 52.0% in China for MSM; from 34.0% in Ukraine to 111.0% in China for FSWs; and from 12.0% among Iranian students to 57.0% in Ukraine for PWID. Our review revealed that VF estimates were heterogeneous, and were not available for most settings, in particular the Middle East and North Africa region, except Iran. More concrete methodologies to estimate the VF are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6280069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Epidemiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62800692018-12-13 A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies Haghdoost, Aliakbar Ahmadi Gohari, Milad Mirzazadeh, Ali Zolala, Farzaneh Baneshi, Mohammad Reza Epidemiol Health Review Article Network scale-up is an indirect size estimation method, in which participants are questioned on sensitive behaviors of their social network members. Therefore, the visibility of the behavior affects the replies and estimates. Many attempts to estimate visibility have been made. The aims of this study were to review the main methods used to address visibility and to provide a summary of reported visibility factors (VFs) across populations. We systematically searched relevant databases and Google. In total, 15 studies and reports that calculated VFs were found. VF calculation studies have been applied in 9 countries, mostly in East Asia and Eastern Europe. The methods applied were expert opinion, comparison of NSU with another method, the game of contacts, social respect, and the coming-out rate. The VF has been calculated for heavy drug users, people who inject drugs (PWID), female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients, male who have sex with male (MSM), alcohol and methamphetamine users, and those who have experienced extra-/pre-marital sex and abortion. The VF varied from 1.4% in Japan to 52.0% in China for MSM; from 34.0% in Ukraine to 111.0% in China for FSWs; and from 12.0% among Iranian students to 57.0% in Ukraine for PWID. Our review revealed that VF estimates were heterogeneous, and were not available for most settings, in particular the Middle East and North Africa region, except Iran. More concrete methodologies to estimate the VF are required. Korean Society of Epidemiology 2018-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6280069/ /pubmed/30121969 http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018041 Text en ©2018, Korean Society of Epidemiology This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Haghdoost, Aliakbar
Ahmadi Gohari, Milad
Mirzazadeh, Ali
Zolala, Farzaneh
Baneshi, Mohammad Reza
A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
title A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
title_full A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
title_fullStr A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
title_full_unstemmed A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
title_short A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
title_sort review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30121969
http://dx.doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018041
work_keys_str_mv AT haghdoostaliakbar areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT ahmadigoharimilad areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT mirzazadehali areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT zolalafarzaneh areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT baneshimohammadreza areviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT haghdoostaliakbar reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT ahmadigoharimilad reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT mirzazadehali reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT zolalafarzaneh reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies
AT baneshimohammadreza reviewofmethodstoestimatethevisibilityfactorforbiascorrectioninnetworkscaleupstudies