Cargando…
Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences. METHOD: a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2692.3083 |
_version_ | 1783378615897948160 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Karoline Faria Pires, Patrícia da Silva De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia Barichello, Elizabeth Galvão, Cristina Maria de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral Barbosa, Maria Helena |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Karoline Faria Pires, Patrícia da Silva De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia Barichello, Elizabeth Galvão, Cristina Maria de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral Barbosa, Maria Helena |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Karoline Faria |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences. METHOD: a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operating table for evaluation of IP on the bony prominences of the occipital, subscapular, sacral, and calcaneal regions using sensors. Seven evaluations were performed for each bony prominence: one on a standard operating table, and the others on tables containing SSs made of viscoelastic polymer, soft foam, or sealed foam. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: the mean IP was higher on the viscoelastic polymer-based SS compared to the other SSs (p<0.001). The mean IP was relatively lower on the density-33 sealed foam and density-18 soft foam. In addition, this variable was comparatively higher in the sacral region (42.90 mmHg) and the calcaneal region (15.35 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IP was relatively lower on foam-based SSs, especially on density-18 soft foam and density-33 sealed foam. Nonetheless, IP was not reduced on the viscoelastic polymer SS compared to the control SS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6280176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62801762018-12-06 Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning de Oliveira, Karoline Faria Pires, Patrícia da Silva De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia Barichello, Elizabeth Galvão, Cristina Maria de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral Barbosa, Maria Helena Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Articles OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences. METHOD: a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operating table for evaluation of IP on the bony prominences of the occipital, subscapular, sacral, and calcaneal regions using sensors. Seven evaluations were performed for each bony prominence: one on a standard operating table, and the others on tables containing SSs made of viscoelastic polymer, soft foam, or sealed foam. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: the mean IP was higher on the viscoelastic polymer-based SS compared to the other SSs (p<0.001). The mean IP was relatively lower on the density-33 sealed foam and density-18 soft foam. In addition, this variable was comparatively higher in the sacral region (42.90 mmHg) and the calcaneal region (15.35 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IP was relatively lower on foam-based SSs, especially on density-18 soft foam and density-33 sealed foam. Nonetheless, IP was not reduced on the viscoelastic polymer SS compared to the control SS. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6280176/ /pubmed/30517574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2692.3083 Text en © 2018 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Oliveira, Karoline Faria Pires, Patrícia da Silva De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia Barichello, Elizabeth Galvão, Cristina Maria de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral Barbosa, Maria Helena Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning |
title | Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface
pressure in surgical positioning
|
title_full | Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface
pressure in surgical positioning
|
title_fullStr | Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface
pressure in surgical positioning
|
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface
pressure in surgical positioning
|
title_short | Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface
pressure in surgical positioning
|
title_sort | influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface
pressure in surgical positioning |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2692.3083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirakarolinefaria influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning AT pirespatriciadasilva influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning AT demattiaanalucia influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning AT barichelloelizabeth influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning AT galvaocristinamaria influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning AT dearaujocleudmaramaral influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning AT barbosamariahelena influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning |