Cargando…

Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences. METHOD: a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Karoline Faria, Pires, Patrícia da Silva, De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia, Barichello, Elizabeth, Galvão, Cristina Maria, de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral, Barbosa, Maria Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2692.3083
_version_ 1783378615897948160
author de Oliveira, Karoline Faria
Pires, Patrícia da Silva
De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia
Barichello, Elizabeth
Galvão, Cristina Maria
de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
Barbosa, Maria Helena
author_facet de Oliveira, Karoline Faria
Pires, Patrícia da Silva
De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia
Barichello, Elizabeth
Galvão, Cristina Maria
de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
Barbosa, Maria Helena
author_sort de Oliveira, Karoline Faria
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences. METHOD: a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operating table for evaluation of IP on the bony prominences of the occipital, subscapular, sacral, and calcaneal regions using sensors. Seven evaluations were performed for each bony prominence: one on a standard operating table, and the others on tables containing SSs made of viscoelastic polymer, soft foam, or sealed foam. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: the mean IP was higher on the viscoelastic polymer-based SS compared to the other SSs (p<0.001). The mean IP was relatively lower on the density-33 sealed foam and density-18 soft foam. In addition, this variable was comparatively higher in the sacral region (42.90 mmHg) and the calcaneal region (15.35 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IP was relatively lower on foam-based SSs, especially on density-18 soft foam and density-33 sealed foam. Nonetheless, IP was not reduced on the viscoelastic polymer SS compared to the control SS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6280176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62801762018-12-06 Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning de Oliveira, Karoline Faria Pires, Patrícia da Silva De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia Barichello, Elizabeth Galvão, Cristina Maria de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral Barbosa, Maria Helena Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Original Articles OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the interface pressure (IP) of support surfaces (SSs) on bony prominences. METHOD: a quasi-experimental study with repeated measures on each SS. Twenty healthy adult volunteers participated in the study. The participants were placed in the supine position on a standard operating table for evaluation of IP on the bony prominences of the occipital, subscapular, sacral, and calcaneal regions using sensors. Seven evaluations were performed for each bony prominence: one on a standard operating table, and the others on tables containing SSs made of viscoelastic polymer, soft foam, or sealed foam. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: the mean IP was higher on the viscoelastic polymer-based SS compared to the other SSs (p<0.001). The mean IP was relatively lower on the density-33 sealed foam and density-18 soft foam. In addition, this variable was comparatively higher in the sacral region (42.90 mmHg) and the calcaneal region (15.35 mmHg). CONCLUSION: IP was relatively lower on foam-based SSs, especially on density-18 soft foam and density-33 sealed foam. Nonetheless, IP was not reduced on the viscoelastic polymer SS compared to the control SS. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2018-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6280176/ /pubmed/30517574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2692.3083 Text en © 2018 Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Articles
de Oliveira, Karoline Faria
Pires, Patrícia da Silva
De-Mattia, Ana Lúcia
Barichello, Elizabeth
Galvão, Cristina Maria
de Araújo, Cleudmar Amaral
Barbosa, Maria Helena
Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
title Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
title_full Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
title_fullStr Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
title_full_unstemmed Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
title_short Influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
title_sort influence of support surfaces on the distribution of body interface pressure in surgical positioning
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30517574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2692.3083
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveirakarolinefaria influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning
AT pirespatriciadasilva influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning
AT demattiaanalucia influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning
AT barichelloelizabeth influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning
AT galvaocristinamaria influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning
AT dearaujocleudmaramaral influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning
AT barbosamariahelena influenceofsupportsurfacesonthedistributionofbodyinterfacepressureinsurgicalpositioning