Cargando…
What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders
BACKGROUND: People with advanced dementia often experience suboptimal end of life care (EoLC) with inadequate pain control, increased hospitalisation, and fewer palliative care interventions compared to those with cancer. Existing policy, guidance and recommendations are based largely on expert opin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30514221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0983-0 |
_version_ | 1783378700554731520 |
---|---|
author | Bamford, Claire Lee, Richard McLellan, Emma Poole, Marie Harrison-Dening, Karen Hughes, Julian Robinson, Louise Exley, Catherine |
author_facet | Bamford, Claire Lee, Richard McLellan, Emma Poole, Marie Harrison-Dening, Karen Hughes, Julian Robinson, Louise Exley, Catherine |
author_sort | Bamford, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: People with advanced dementia often experience suboptimal end of life care (EoLC) with inadequate pain control, increased hospitalisation, and fewer palliative care interventions compared to those with cancer. Existing policy, guidance and recommendations are based largely on expert opinion because of a shortage of high quality, empirical research. Previous studies have tended to consider the views and experience of particular groups. Whilst providing important evidence, they do not take into account the diversity of perspectives of different stakeholders. The Supporting Excellence in End of life care in Dementia (SEED) programme involved multiple stakeholder groups and an integrative analysis to identify key components of good EoLC for people with dementia and to inform a new intervention. METHODS: The views of national experts, service managers, frontline staff, people with dementia and family carers were explored using a range of qualitative methods (semi-structured interviews, focus groups, discussions and observations of routine care). The large dataset comprises 116 interviews, 12 focus groups and 256 h of observation. Each dataset was initially analysed thematically prior to an integrative analysis, which drew out key themes across stakeholder groups. RESULTS: Through the integrative analysis seven key factors required for the delivery of good EoLC for people with dementia were identified: timely planning discussions; recognition of end of life and provision of supportive care; co-ordination of care; effective working relationships with primary care; managing hospitalisation; continuing care after death; and valuing staff and ongoing learning. These factors span the entire illness trajectory from planning at a relatively early stage in the illness to continuing care after death. CONCLUSIONS: This unique study has confirmed the relevance of much of the content of existing end of life frameworks to dementia. It has highlighted seven key areas that are particularly important in dementia care. The data are being used to develop an evidence-based intervention to support professionals to deliver better EoLC in dementia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0983-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6280541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62805412018-12-10 What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders Bamford, Claire Lee, Richard McLellan, Emma Poole, Marie Harrison-Dening, Karen Hughes, Julian Robinson, Louise Exley, Catherine BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: People with advanced dementia often experience suboptimal end of life care (EoLC) with inadequate pain control, increased hospitalisation, and fewer palliative care interventions compared to those with cancer. Existing policy, guidance and recommendations are based largely on expert opinion because of a shortage of high quality, empirical research. Previous studies have tended to consider the views and experience of particular groups. Whilst providing important evidence, they do not take into account the diversity of perspectives of different stakeholders. The Supporting Excellence in End of life care in Dementia (SEED) programme involved multiple stakeholder groups and an integrative analysis to identify key components of good EoLC for people with dementia and to inform a new intervention. METHODS: The views of national experts, service managers, frontline staff, people with dementia and family carers were explored using a range of qualitative methods (semi-structured interviews, focus groups, discussions and observations of routine care). The large dataset comprises 116 interviews, 12 focus groups and 256 h of observation. Each dataset was initially analysed thematically prior to an integrative analysis, which drew out key themes across stakeholder groups. RESULTS: Through the integrative analysis seven key factors required for the delivery of good EoLC for people with dementia were identified: timely planning discussions; recognition of end of life and provision of supportive care; co-ordination of care; effective working relationships with primary care; managing hospitalisation; continuing care after death; and valuing staff and ongoing learning. These factors span the entire illness trajectory from planning at a relatively early stage in the illness to continuing care after death. CONCLUSIONS: This unique study has confirmed the relevance of much of the content of existing end of life frameworks to dementia. It has highlighted seven key areas that are particularly important in dementia care. The data are being used to develop an evidence-based intervention to support professionals to deliver better EoLC in dementia. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-0983-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6280541/ /pubmed/30514221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0983-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bamford, Claire Lee, Richard McLellan, Emma Poole, Marie Harrison-Dening, Karen Hughes, Julian Robinson, Louise Exley, Catherine What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title | What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_full | What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_fullStr | What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_short | What enables good end of life care for people with dementia? A multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
title_sort | what enables good end of life care for people with dementia? a multi-method qualitative study with key stakeholders |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30514221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0983-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bamfordclaire whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT leerichard whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT mclellanemma whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT poolemarie whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT harrisondeningkaren whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT hughesjulian whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT robinsonlouise whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders AT exleycatherine whatenablesgoodendoflifecareforpeoplewithdementiaamultimethodqualitativestudywithkeystakeholders |