Cargando…
Effect of intravitreal C(3)F(8) gas in patients with vitreomacular traction: A retrospective case series
BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the efficacy of a single intravitreal perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction with or without a macular hole. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, seven eyes of six patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction do...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280806/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30595622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00717-017-0382-5 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the efficacy of a single intravitreal perfluoropropane (C(3)F(8)) gas injection for the treatment of vitreomacular traction with or without a macular hole. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, seven eyes of six patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction documented on optical coherence tomography, one with a macular hole additionally, received a single intravitreal C(3)F(8) gas injection of up to 0.3 ml. The primary endpoint was vitreomacular traction release at 1 month after injection. Secondary endpoints included resolution of vitreomacular adhesion within 6 months, nonsurgical closure of macular holes, and change in central foveal thickness and best-corrected visual acuity. RESULTS: Overall, on optical coherence tomography, six of seven eyes (85.7%) had release of vitreomacular traction during the entire study duration: three within 1 month of injection and the other three within 6 months. Of the latter group, two of the three eyes showed a concurrent epiretinal membrane and one concurrent diabetic retino- and maculopathy. The patient with a macular hole had resolution of vitreomacular traction within 1 month but had to undergo vitrectomy because of nonclosure of the macular hole. Associated adverse events were macular edema with a consequent lamellar hole after injection in one patient, and another patient developed retinal detachment. CONCLUSION: Intravitreal C(3)F(8)gas injection is an inexpensive and promising minimally invasive option for the treatment of symptomatic and persistent vitreomacular traction with or without a macular hole. Further larger studies, especially comparing C(3)F(8) gas injection with other treatment options, are needed. |
---|