Cargando…

Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oddo, Mauro, Sandroni, Claudio, Citerio, Giuseppe, Miroz, John-Paul, Horn, Janneke, Rundgren, Malin, Cariou, Alain, Payen, Jean-François, Storm, Christian, Stammet, Pascal, Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6
_version_ 1783378744153473024
author Oddo, Mauro
Sandroni, Claudio
Citerio, Giuseppe
Miroz, John-Paul
Horn, Janneke
Rundgren, Malin
Cariou, Alain
Payen, Jean-François
Storm, Christian
Stammet, Pascal
Taccone, Fabio Silvio
author_facet Oddo, Mauro
Sandroni, Claudio
Citerio, Giuseppe
Miroz, John-Paul
Horn, Janneke
Rundgren, Malin
Cariou, Alain
Payen, Jean-François
Storm, Christian
Stammet, Pascal
Taccone, Fabio Silvio
author_sort Oddo, Mauro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitative NPi and standard manual pupillary light reflex (sPLR)—blinded to clinicians and outcome assessors—were recorded in parallel from day 1 to 3 after CA. Primary study endpoint was to compare the value of NPi versus sPLR to predict 3-month Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), dichotomized as favorable (CPC 1–2: full recovery or moderate disability) versus unfavorable outcome (CPC 3–5: severe disability, vegetative state, or death). RESULTS: At any time between day 1 and 3, an NPi ≤ 2 (n = 456 patients) had a 51% (95% CI 49–53) negative predictive value and a 100% positive predictive value [PPV; 0% (0–2) false-positive rate], with a 100% (98–100) specificity and 32% (27–38) sensitivity for the prediction of unfavorable outcome. Compared with NPi, sPLR had significantly lower PPV and significantly lower specificity (p  < 0.001 at day 1 and 2; p  = 0.06 at day 3). The combination of NPi ≤ 2 with bilaterally absent somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP; n = 188 patients) provided higher sensitivity [58% (49–67) vs. 48% (39–57) for SSEP alone], with comparable specificity [100% (94–100)]. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative NPi had excellent ability to predict an unfavorable outcome from day 1 after CA, with no false positives, and significantly higher specificity than standard manual pupillary examination. The addition of NPi to SSEP increased sensitivity of outcome prediction, while maintaining 100% specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6280828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62808282018-12-26 Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study Oddo, Mauro Sandroni, Claudio Citerio, Giuseppe Miroz, John-Paul Horn, Janneke Rundgren, Malin Cariou, Alain Payen, Jean-François Storm, Christian Stammet, Pascal Taccone, Fabio Silvio Intensive Care Med Original PURPOSE: To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitative NPi and standard manual pupillary light reflex (sPLR)—blinded to clinicians and outcome assessors—were recorded in parallel from day 1 to 3 after CA. Primary study endpoint was to compare the value of NPi versus sPLR to predict 3-month Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), dichotomized as favorable (CPC 1–2: full recovery or moderate disability) versus unfavorable outcome (CPC 3–5: severe disability, vegetative state, or death). RESULTS: At any time between day 1 and 3, an NPi ≤ 2 (n = 456 patients) had a 51% (95% CI 49–53) negative predictive value and a 100% positive predictive value [PPV; 0% (0–2) false-positive rate], with a 100% (98–100) specificity and 32% (27–38) sensitivity for the prediction of unfavorable outcome. Compared with NPi, sPLR had significantly lower PPV and significantly lower specificity (p  < 0.001 at day 1 and 2; p  = 0.06 at day 3). The combination of NPi ≤ 2 with bilaterally absent somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP; n = 188 patients) provided higher sensitivity [58% (49–67) vs. 48% (39–57) for SSEP alone], with comparable specificity [100% (94–100)]. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative NPi had excellent ability to predict an unfavorable outcome from day 1 after CA, with no false positives, and significantly higher specificity than standard manual pupillary examination. The addition of NPi to SSEP increased sensitivity of outcome prediction, while maintaining 100% specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6280828/ /pubmed/30478620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original
Oddo, Mauro
Sandroni, Claudio
Citerio, Giuseppe
Miroz, John-Paul
Horn, Janneke
Rundgren, Malin
Cariou, Alain
Payen, Jean-François
Storm, Christian
Stammet, Pascal
Taccone, Fabio Silvio
Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
title Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
title_full Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
title_fullStr Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
title_short Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
title_sort quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6
work_keys_str_mv AT oddomauro quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT sandroniclaudio quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT citeriogiuseppe quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT mirozjohnpaul quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT hornjanneke quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT rundgrenmalin quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT carioualain quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT payenjeanfrancois quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT stormchristian quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT stammetpascal quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy
AT tacconefabiosilvio quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy