Cargando…
Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study
PURPOSE: To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6 |
_version_ | 1783378744153473024 |
---|---|
author | Oddo, Mauro Sandroni, Claudio Citerio, Giuseppe Miroz, John-Paul Horn, Janneke Rundgren, Malin Cariou, Alain Payen, Jean-François Storm, Christian Stammet, Pascal Taccone, Fabio Silvio |
author_facet | Oddo, Mauro Sandroni, Claudio Citerio, Giuseppe Miroz, John-Paul Horn, Janneke Rundgren, Malin Cariou, Alain Payen, Jean-François Storm, Christian Stammet, Pascal Taccone, Fabio Silvio |
author_sort | Oddo, Mauro |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitative NPi and standard manual pupillary light reflex (sPLR)—blinded to clinicians and outcome assessors—were recorded in parallel from day 1 to 3 after CA. Primary study endpoint was to compare the value of NPi versus sPLR to predict 3-month Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), dichotomized as favorable (CPC 1–2: full recovery or moderate disability) versus unfavorable outcome (CPC 3–5: severe disability, vegetative state, or death). RESULTS: At any time between day 1 and 3, an NPi ≤ 2 (n = 456 patients) had a 51% (95% CI 49–53) negative predictive value and a 100% positive predictive value [PPV; 0% (0–2) false-positive rate], with a 100% (98–100) specificity and 32% (27–38) sensitivity for the prediction of unfavorable outcome. Compared with NPi, sPLR had significantly lower PPV and significantly lower specificity (p < 0.001 at day 1 and 2; p = 0.06 at day 3). The combination of NPi ≤ 2 with bilaterally absent somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP; n = 188 patients) provided higher sensitivity [58% (49–67) vs. 48% (39–57) for SSEP alone], with comparable specificity [100% (94–100)]. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative NPi had excellent ability to predict an unfavorable outcome from day 1 after CA, with no false positives, and significantly higher specificity than standard manual pupillary examination. The addition of NPi to SSEP increased sensitivity of outcome prediction, while maintaining 100% specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6280828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62808282018-12-26 Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study Oddo, Mauro Sandroni, Claudio Citerio, Giuseppe Miroz, John-Paul Horn, Janneke Rundgren, Malin Cariou, Alain Payen, Jean-François Storm, Christian Stammet, Pascal Taccone, Fabio Silvio Intensive Care Med Original PURPOSE: To assess the ability of quantitative pupillometry [using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi)] to predict an unfavorable neurological outcome after cardiac arrest (CA). METHODS: We performed a prospective international multicenter study (10 centers) in adult comatose CA patients. Quantitative NPi and standard manual pupillary light reflex (sPLR)—blinded to clinicians and outcome assessors—were recorded in parallel from day 1 to 3 after CA. Primary study endpoint was to compare the value of NPi versus sPLR to predict 3-month Cerebral Performance Category (CPC), dichotomized as favorable (CPC 1–2: full recovery or moderate disability) versus unfavorable outcome (CPC 3–5: severe disability, vegetative state, or death). RESULTS: At any time between day 1 and 3, an NPi ≤ 2 (n = 456 patients) had a 51% (95% CI 49–53) negative predictive value and a 100% positive predictive value [PPV; 0% (0–2) false-positive rate], with a 100% (98–100) specificity and 32% (27–38) sensitivity for the prediction of unfavorable outcome. Compared with NPi, sPLR had significantly lower PPV and significantly lower specificity (p < 0.001 at day 1 and 2; p = 0.06 at day 3). The combination of NPi ≤ 2 with bilaterally absent somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP; n = 188 patients) provided higher sensitivity [58% (49–67) vs. 48% (39–57) for SSEP alone], with comparable specificity [100% (94–100)]. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative NPi had excellent ability to predict an unfavorable outcome from day 1 after CA, with no false positives, and significantly higher specificity than standard manual pupillary examination. The addition of NPi to SSEP increased sensitivity of outcome prediction, while maintaining 100% specificity. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6280828/ /pubmed/30478620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Oddo, Mauro Sandroni, Claudio Citerio, Giuseppe Miroz, John-Paul Horn, Janneke Rundgren, Malin Cariou, Alain Payen, Jean-François Storm, Christian Stammet, Pascal Taccone, Fabio Silvio Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
title | Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
title_full | Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
title_fullStr | Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
title_short | Quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
title_sort | quantitative versus standard pupillary light reflex for early prognostication in comatose cardiac arrest patients: an international prospective multicenter double-blinded study |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30478620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5448-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oddomauro quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT sandroniclaudio quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT citeriogiuseppe quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT mirozjohnpaul quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT hornjanneke quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT rundgrenmalin quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT carioualain quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT payenjeanfrancois quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT stormchristian quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT stammetpascal quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy AT tacconefabiosilvio quantitativeversusstandardpupillarylightreflexforearlyprognosticationincomatosecardiacarrestpatientsaninternationalprospectivemulticenterdoubleblindedstudy |