Cargando…
Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease
Although there are a growing number of well-reported, late-stage clinical trial failures in Alzheimer’s disease, the introduction of a disease-modifying therapy within the next 5 years may be anticipated. These treatments are likely to target Alzheimer’s disease in the earlier disease stages, unlike...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0581-x |
_version_ | 1783378747940929536 |
---|---|
author | Bouvy, Jacoline C. Jonsson, Pall O’Rourke, Diana Chadha, Antonella Santuccione Hedberg, Niklas Makady, Amr Xoxi, Entela Wied, Christine Gispen-de Schiel, Anja Long, Raj Gallacher, John |
author_facet | Bouvy, Jacoline C. Jonsson, Pall O’Rourke, Diana Chadha, Antonella Santuccione Hedberg, Niklas Makady, Amr Xoxi, Entela Wied, Christine Gispen-de Schiel, Anja Long, Raj Gallacher, John |
author_sort | Bouvy, Jacoline C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although there are a growing number of well-reported, late-stage clinical trial failures in Alzheimer’s disease, the introduction of a disease-modifying therapy within the next 5 years may be anticipated. These treatments are likely to target Alzheimer’s disease in the earlier disease stages, unlike drugs that are currently available that treat symptoms of moderate-to-severe dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish a consensus on regulatory and health technology assessment requirements for Alzheimer’s disease, as a new drug will need to undergo regulatory and health technology assessments before it becomes available to patients. This article reports the discussions and activities of the regulatory and health technology assessment expert advisory group of the 2-year ROADMAP (real-world outcomes across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum: a multimodal data access platform) project. The expert advisory group discussions identified a lack of consensus on validated outcomes in the earliest Alzheimer’s disease stages, the need for filling gaps between outcomes used across clinical trials and real-world settings, and the role that real-world evidence might have in characterising the impact of a possible disease-modifying therapy on caregivers, resource use and long-term outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6280845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62808452018-12-26 Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease Bouvy, Jacoline C. Jonsson, Pall O’Rourke, Diana Chadha, Antonella Santuccione Hedberg, Niklas Makady, Amr Xoxi, Entela Wied, Christine Gispen-de Schiel, Anja Long, Raj Gallacher, John CNS Drugs Current Opinion Although there are a growing number of well-reported, late-stage clinical trial failures in Alzheimer’s disease, the introduction of a disease-modifying therapy within the next 5 years may be anticipated. These treatments are likely to target Alzheimer’s disease in the earlier disease stages, unlike drugs that are currently available that treat symptoms of moderate-to-severe dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish a consensus on regulatory and health technology assessment requirements for Alzheimer’s disease, as a new drug will need to undergo regulatory and health technology assessments before it becomes available to patients. This article reports the discussions and activities of the regulatory and health technology assessment expert advisory group of the 2-year ROADMAP (real-world outcomes across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum: a multimodal data access platform) project. The expert advisory group discussions identified a lack of consensus on validated outcomes in the earliest Alzheimer’s disease stages, the need for filling gaps between outcomes used across clinical trials and real-world settings, and the role that real-world evidence might have in characterising the impact of a possible disease-modifying therapy on caregivers, resource use and long-term outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6280845/ /pubmed/30467744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0581-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Current Opinion Bouvy, Jacoline C. Jonsson, Pall O’Rourke, Diana Chadha, Antonella Santuccione Hedberg, Niklas Makady, Amr Xoxi, Entela Wied, Christine Gispen-de Schiel, Anja Long, Raj Gallacher, John Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title | Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_full | Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_fullStr | Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_short | Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Considerations for Disease-Modifying Drugs in Alzheimer’s Disease |
title_sort | regulatory and health technology assessment considerations for disease-modifying drugs in alzheimer’s disease |
topic | Current Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6280845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0581-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bouvyjacolinec regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT jonssonpall regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT orourkediana regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT chadhaantonellasantuccione regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT hedbergniklas regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT makadyamr regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT xoxientela regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT wiedchristinegispende regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT schielanja regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT longraj regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease AT gallacherjohn regulatoryandhealthtechnologyassessmentconsiderationsfordiseasemodifyingdrugsinalzheimersdisease |