Cargando…
Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
Alpine ski analysis has always been very challenging, mainly due to the environmental conditions, large field and rapid and dynamic skiers’ movements. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) offers a solution adapted to outdoor testing, but the relationship between the point where the antenna is a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01541 |
_version_ | 1783378918335578112 |
---|---|
author | Meyer, Frédéric Borrani, Fabio |
author_facet | Meyer, Frédéric Borrani, Fabio |
author_sort | Meyer, Frédéric |
collection | PubMed |
description | Alpine ski analysis has always been very challenging, mainly due to the environmental conditions, large field and rapid and dynamic skiers’ movements. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) offers a solution adapted to outdoor testing, but the relationship between the point where the antenna is attached and the real centre of mass (CoM) position is still unknown. This article proposes to compare different points of the body used to quantify the performance of alpine skiers. 3D models of seven elite skiers performing giant slalom (GS) were built using multiple camera system and dedicated motion tracking software. CoM as well as pelvis, head and feet trajectories were deduced from the data. The potential and kinetic energies corresponding to these points were calculated, as well as the evolution of the turn radius during the turn cycle. Differences between values given by the CoM and the other morphological points were analyzed. The pelvis offered the best estimation of the CoM: No differences were found for the biomechanical parameters, except for the kinetic energy, where 2% of the turn cycle had significant different values. The head was less accurate compared to the pelvis, showing significant differences with CoM between 7 and 20% of the turn cycle depending on the parameter. Finally, the feet offered the worst results, with significant differences between 16 and 41% of the turn cycle. Energies and turn radius calculated by using pelvis in place of CoM offered similar patterns, allowing the analysis of mechanical and dissipation energy in GS. This may potentially enable easier testing methods to be proposed and tested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6282051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62820512018-12-14 Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points Meyer, Frédéric Borrani, Fabio Front Physiol Physiology Alpine ski analysis has always been very challenging, mainly due to the environmental conditions, large field and rapid and dynamic skiers’ movements. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) offers a solution adapted to outdoor testing, but the relationship between the point where the antenna is attached and the real centre of mass (CoM) position is still unknown. This article proposes to compare different points of the body used to quantify the performance of alpine skiers. 3D models of seven elite skiers performing giant slalom (GS) were built using multiple camera system and dedicated motion tracking software. CoM as well as pelvis, head and feet trajectories were deduced from the data. The potential and kinetic energies corresponding to these points were calculated, as well as the evolution of the turn radius during the turn cycle. Differences between values given by the CoM and the other morphological points were analyzed. The pelvis offered the best estimation of the CoM: No differences were found for the biomechanical parameters, except for the kinetic energy, where 2% of the turn cycle had significant different values. The head was less accurate compared to the pelvis, showing significant differences with CoM between 7 and 20% of the turn cycle depending on the parameter. Finally, the feet offered the worst results, with significant differences between 16 and 41% of the turn cycle. Energies and turn radius calculated by using pelvis in place of CoM offered similar patterns, allowing the analysis of mechanical and dissipation energy in GS. This may potentially enable easier testing methods to be proposed and tested. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6282051/ /pubmed/30555335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01541 Text en Copyright © 2018 Meyer and Borrani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Meyer, Frédéric Borrani, Fabio Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points |
title | Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points |
title_full | Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points |
title_fullStr | Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points |
title_short | Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points |
title_sort | estimating alpine skiers’ energetics and turn radius using different morphological points |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01541 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meyerfrederic estimatingalpineskiersenergeticsandturnradiususingdifferentmorphologicalpoints AT borranifabio estimatingalpineskiersenergeticsandturnradiususingdifferentmorphologicalpoints |