Cargando…

Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points

Alpine ski analysis has always been very challenging, mainly due to the environmental conditions, large field and rapid and dynamic skiers’ movements. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) offers a solution adapted to outdoor testing, but the relationship between the point where the antenna is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Frédéric, Borrani, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01541
_version_ 1783378918335578112
author Meyer, Frédéric
Borrani, Fabio
author_facet Meyer, Frédéric
Borrani, Fabio
author_sort Meyer, Frédéric
collection PubMed
description Alpine ski analysis has always been very challenging, mainly due to the environmental conditions, large field and rapid and dynamic skiers’ movements. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) offers a solution adapted to outdoor testing, but the relationship between the point where the antenna is attached and the real centre of mass (CoM) position is still unknown. This article proposes to compare different points of the body used to quantify the performance of alpine skiers. 3D models of seven elite skiers performing giant slalom (GS) were built using multiple camera system and dedicated motion tracking software. CoM as well as pelvis, head and feet trajectories were deduced from the data. The potential and kinetic energies corresponding to these points were calculated, as well as the evolution of the turn radius during the turn cycle. Differences between values given by the CoM and the other morphological points were analyzed. The pelvis offered the best estimation of the CoM: No differences were found for the biomechanical parameters, except for the kinetic energy, where 2% of the turn cycle had significant different values. The head was less accurate compared to the pelvis, showing significant differences with CoM between 7 and 20% of the turn cycle depending on the parameter. Finally, the feet offered the worst results, with significant differences between 16 and 41% of the turn cycle. Energies and turn radius calculated by using pelvis in place of CoM offered similar patterns, allowing the analysis of mechanical and dissipation energy in GS. This may potentially enable easier testing methods to be proposed and tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282051
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62820512018-12-14 Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points Meyer, Frédéric Borrani, Fabio Front Physiol Physiology Alpine ski analysis has always been very challenging, mainly due to the environmental conditions, large field and rapid and dynamic skiers’ movements. Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) offers a solution adapted to outdoor testing, but the relationship between the point where the antenna is attached and the real centre of mass (CoM) position is still unknown. This article proposes to compare different points of the body used to quantify the performance of alpine skiers. 3D models of seven elite skiers performing giant slalom (GS) were built using multiple camera system and dedicated motion tracking software. CoM as well as pelvis, head and feet trajectories were deduced from the data. The potential and kinetic energies corresponding to these points were calculated, as well as the evolution of the turn radius during the turn cycle. Differences between values given by the CoM and the other morphological points were analyzed. The pelvis offered the best estimation of the CoM: No differences were found for the biomechanical parameters, except for the kinetic energy, where 2% of the turn cycle had significant different values. The head was less accurate compared to the pelvis, showing significant differences with CoM between 7 and 20% of the turn cycle depending on the parameter. Finally, the feet offered the worst results, with significant differences between 16 and 41% of the turn cycle. Energies and turn radius calculated by using pelvis in place of CoM offered similar patterns, allowing the analysis of mechanical and dissipation energy in GS. This may potentially enable easier testing methods to be proposed and tested. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6282051/ /pubmed/30555335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01541 Text en Copyright © 2018 Meyer and Borrani. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Meyer, Frédéric
Borrani, Fabio
Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
title Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
title_full Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
title_fullStr Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
title_full_unstemmed Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
title_short Estimating Alpine Skiers’ Energetics and Turn Radius Using Different Morphological Points
title_sort estimating alpine skiers’ energetics and turn radius using different morphological points
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282051/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01541
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerfrederic estimatingalpineskiersenergeticsandturnradiususingdifferentmorphologicalpoints
AT borranifabio estimatingalpineskiersenergeticsandturnradiususingdifferentmorphologicalpoints