Cargando…

Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: New, complex, and expensive therapies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5) to treat severe eosinophilic asthma are emerging. Objective: To assess efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab for treating severe eosinophilic asthma. Design: A systematic revi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henriksen, Daniel P., Bodtger, Uffe, Sidenius, Kirsten, Maltbaek, Niels, Pedersen, Lars, Madsen, Hanne, Andersson, Ehm A., Norgaard, Ole, Madsen, Louise Klokker, Chawes, Bo L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097
_version_ 1783378990482849792
author Henriksen, Daniel P.
Bodtger, Uffe
Sidenius, Kirsten
Maltbaek, Niels
Pedersen, Lars
Madsen, Hanne
Andersson, Ehm A.
Norgaard, Ole
Madsen, Louise Klokker
Chawes, Bo L.
author_facet Henriksen, Daniel P.
Bodtger, Uffe
Sidenius, Kirsten
Maltbaek, Niels
Pedersen, Lars
Madsen, Hanne
Andersson, Ehm A.
Norgaard, Ole
Madsen, Louise Klokker
Chawes, Bo L.
author_sort Henriksen, Daniel P.
collection PubMed
description Background: New, complex, and expensive therapies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5) to treat severe eosinophilic asthma are emerging. Objective: To assess efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab for treating severe eosinophilic asthma. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials elucidating two critical (exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use) and six important clinical outcomes on the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab and reslizumab. Results: Five studies (N = 2197) contributed with data for exacerbation rate, showing a reduction of 53% (95% CI 46; 59) in favour of anti-IL-5, corresponding to –0.94 annual exacerbations (95% CI –1.08;–0.82), thus exceeding the predefined minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of 25% reduction of the estimated ≥2 annual exacerbations. Quality of evidence was considered moderate, with low heterogeneity in study findings (I2 = 0%). One study (N = 135) contributed with data on percentage of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction inoral corticosteroid treatment, showing an effect of 20% (95% CI 2.3;47) in favour of anti-IL-5 treatment (mepolizumab), thus exceeding the predefined MCID of 10%. Quality of evidence was considered low. Compared to placebo, anti-IL-5 showed significant improvements in lung function, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life, but below the MCIDs. No differences were observed for serious adverse events and number of patients, who dropped out. No studies evaluating sickleave or head-to-head comparisons were identified. By indirect comparison, we found no significant difference between mepolizumab and reslizumab in any ofthe predefined clinical outcomes. OCS treatment reduction could not be compared due to lack of reslizumab studies investigating this outcome. Conclusions: Mepolizumab and reslizumab provide significant and clinically relevant improvements in exacerbation rate and OCS reduction. Indirect, inter-study comparisons revealed no differences between the anti-IL-5 drugs in efficacy or safety measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62824282018-12-07 Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis Henriksen, Daniel P. Bodtger, Uffe Sidenius, Kirsten Maltbaek, Niels Pedersen, Lars Madsen, Hanne Andersson, Ehm A. Norgaard, Ole Madsen, Louise Klokker Chawes, Bo L. Eur Clin Respir J Review Article Background: New, complex, and expensive therapies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5) to treat severe eosinophilic asthma are emerging. Objective: To assess efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab for treating severe eosinophilic asthma. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials elucidating two critical (exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use) and six important clinical outcomes on the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab and reslizumab. Results: Five studies (N = 2197) contributed with data for exacerbation rate, showing a reduction of 53% (95% CI 46; 59) in favour of anti-IL-5, corresponding to –0.94 annual exacerbations (95% CI –1.08;–0.82), thus exceeding the predefined minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of 25% reduction of the estimated ≥2 annual exacerbations. Quality of evidence was considered moderate, with low heterogeneity in study findings (I2 = 0%). One study (N = 135) contributed with data on percentage of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction inoral corticosteroid treatment, showing an effect of 20% (95% CI 2.3;47) in favour of anti-IL-5 treatment (mepolizumab), thus exceeding the predefined MCID of 10%. Quality of evidence was considered low. Compared to placebo, anti-IL-5 showed significant improvements in lung function, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life, but below the MCIDs. No differences were observed for serious adverse events and number of patients, who dropped out. No studies evaluating sickleave or head-to-head comparisons were identified. By indirect comparison, we found no significant difference between mepolizumab and reslizumab in any ofthe predefined clinical outcomes. OCS treatment reduction could not be compared due to lack of reslizumab studies investigating this outcome. Conclusions: Mepolizumab and reslizumab provide significant and clinically relevant improvements in exacerbation rate and OCS reduction. Indirect, inter-study comparisons revealed no differences between the anti-IL-5 drugs in efficacy or safety measures. Taylor & Francis 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6282428/ /pubmed/30533206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Henriksen, Daniel P.
Bodtger, Uffe
Sidenius, Kirsten
Maltbaek, Niels
Pedersen, Lars
Madsen, Hanne
Andersson, Ehm A.
Norgaard, Ole
Madsen, Louise Klokker
Chawes, Bo L.
Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-il-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097
work_keys_str_mv AT henriksendanielp efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bodtgeruffe efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sideniuskirsten efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maltbaekniels efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pedersenlars efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT madsenhanne efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anderssonehma efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT norgaardole efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT madsenlouiseklokker efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chawesbol efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis