Cargando…
Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: New, complex, and expensive therapies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5) to treat severe eosinophilic asthma are emerging. Objective: To assess efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab for treating severe eosinophilic asthma. Design: A systematic revi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097 |
_version_ | 1783378990482849792 |
---|---|
author | Henriksen, Daniel P. Bodtger, Uffe Sidenius, Kirsten Maltbaek, Niels Pedersen, Lars Madsen, Hanne Andersson, Ehm A. Norgaard, Ole Madsen, Louise Klokker Chawes, Bo L. |
author_facet | Henriksen, Daniel P. Bodtger, Uffe Sidenius, Kirsten Maltbaek, Niels Pedersen, Lars Madsen, Hanne Andersson, Ehm A. Norgaard, Ole Madsen, Louise Klokker Chawes, Bo L. |
author_sort | Henriksen, Daniel P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: New, complex, and expensive therapies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5) to treat severe eosinophilic asthma are emerging. Objective: To assess efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab for treating severe eosinophilic asthma. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials elucidating two critical (exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use) and six important clinical outcomes on the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab and reslizumab. Results: Five studies (N = 2197) contributed with data for exacerbation rate, showing a reduction of 53% (95% CI 46; 59) in favour of anti-IL-5, corresponding to –0.94 annual exacerbations (95% CI –1.08;–0.82), thus exceeding the predefined minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of 25% reduction of the estimated ≥2 annual exacerbations. Quality of evidence was considered moderate, with low heterogeneity in study findings (I2 = 0%). One study (N = 135) contributed with data on percentage of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction inoral corticosteroid treatment, showing an effect of 20% (95% CI 2.3;47) in favour of anti-IL-5 treatment (mepolizumab), thus exceeding the predefined MCID of 10%. Quality of evidence was considered low. Compared to placebo, anti-IL-5 showed significant improvements in lung function, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life, but below the MCIDs. No differences were observed for serious adverse events and number of patients, who dropped out. No studies evaluating sickleave or head-to-head comparisons were identified. By indirect comparison, we found no significant difference between mepolizumab and reslizumab in any ofthe predefined clinical outcomes. OCS treatment reduction could not be compared due to lack of reslizumab studies investigating this outcome. Conclusions: Mepolizumab and reslizumab provide significant and clinically relevant improvements in exacerbation rate and OCS reduction. Indirect, inter-study comparisons revealed no differences between the anti-IL-5 drugs in efficacy or safety measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6282428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62824282018-12-07 Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis Henriksen, Daniel P. Bodtger, Uffe Sidenius, Kirsten Maltbaek, Niels Pedersen, Lars Madsen, Hanne Andersson, Ehm A. Norgaard, Ole Madsen, Louise Klokker Chawes, Bo L. Eur Clin Respir J Review Article Background: New, complex, and expensive therapies targeting Interleukin-5 (IL-5) to treat severe eosinophilic asthma are emerging. Objective: To assess efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab for treating severe eosinophilic asthma. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials elucidating two critical (exacerbation rate and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use) and six important clinical outcomes on the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab and reslizumab. Results: Five studies (N = 2197) contributed with data for exacerbation rate, showing a reduction of 53% (95% CI 46; 59) in favour of anti-IL-5, corresponding to –0.94 annual exacerbations (95% CI –1.08;–0.82), thus exceeding the predefined minimal clinical important difference (MCID) of 25% reduction of the estimated ≥2 annual exacerbations. Quality of evidence was considered moderate, with low heterogeneity in study findings (I2 = 0%). One study (N = 135) contributed with data on percentage of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction inoral corticosteroid treatment, showing an effect of 20% (95% CI 2.3;47) in favour of anti-IL-5 treatment (mepolizumab), thus exceeding the predefined MCID of 10%. Quality of evidence was considered low. Compared to placebo, anti-IL-5 showed significant improvements in lung function, asthma control, and asthma-related quality of life, but below the MCIDs. No differences were observed for serious adverse events and number of patients, who dropped out. No studies evaluating sickleave or head-to-head comparisons were identified. By indirect comparison, we found no significant difference between mepolizumab and reslizumab in any ofthe predefined clinical outcomes. OCS treatment reduction could not be compared due to lack of reslizumab studies investigating this outcome. Conclusions: Mepolizumab and reslizumab provide significant and clinically relevant improvements in exacerbation rate and OCS reduction. Indirect, inter-study comparisons revealed no differences between the anti-IL-5 drugs in efficacy or safety measures. Taylor & Francis 2018-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6282428/ /pubmed/30533206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Henriksen, Daniel P. Bodtger, Uffe Sidenius, Kirsten Maltbaek, Niels Pedersen, Lars Madsen, Hanne Andersson, Ehm A. Norgaard, Ole Madsen, Louise Klokker Chawes, Bo L. Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-IL-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy, adverse events, and inter-drug comparison of mepolizumab and reslizumab anti-il-5 treatments of severe asthma – a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2018.1536097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henriksendanielp efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bodtgeruffe efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sideniuskirsten efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maltbaekniels efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pedersenlars efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT madsenhanne efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anderssonehma efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT norgaardole efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT madsenlouiseklokker efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chawesbol efficacyadverseeventsandinterdrugcomparisonofmepolizumabandreslizumabantiil5treatmentsofsevereasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |