Cargando…
Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
BACKGROUND: With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to im...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30311641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10993 |
_version_ | 1783379014487900160 |
---|---|
author | Clifford, R. Govindarajah, N. Parsons, J. L. Gollins, S. West, N. P. Vimalachandran, D. |
author_facet | Clifford, R. Govindarajah, N. Parsons, J. L. Gollins, S. West, N. P. Vimalachandran, D. |
author_sort | Clifford, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to improve response and it is unclear what the clinical endpoints of such trials should be. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using preset search criteria across the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases from 1990 to 2017. Additional results were generated from the reference lists of included papers. RESULTS: A total of 123 papers were identified, of which 37 were included; a further 60 articles were obtained from additional referencing to give a total of 97 articles. Neoadjuvant radiosensitization for locally advanced rectal cancer using fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment. The oral derivative capecitabine has practical advantages over 5‐fluorouracil, with equal efficacy, but the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent has yet to show a consistent significant efficacy benefit in randomized clinical assessment. Preclinical and early‐phase trials are progressing with promising novel agents, such as small molecular inhibitors and nanoparticles. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive research and promising preclinical studies, a definite further agent in addition to fluoropyrimidines that consistently improves response rate has yet to be found. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6282533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62825332018-12-11 Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer Clifford, R. Govindarajah, N. Parsons, J. L. Gollins, S. West, N. P. Vimalachandran, D. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to improve response and it is unclear what the clinical endpoints of such trials should be. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using preset search criteria across the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases from 1990 to 2017. Additional results were generated from the reference lists of included papers. RESULTS: A total of 123 papers were identified, of which 37 were included; a further 60 articles were obtained from additional referencing to give a total of 97 articles. Neoadjuvant radiosensitization for locally advanced rectal cancer using fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment. The oral derivative capecitabine has practical advantages over 5‐fluorouracil, with equal efficacy, but the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent has yet to show a consistent significant efficacy benefit in randomized clinical assessment. Preclinical and early‐phase trials are progressing with promising novel agents, such as small molecular inhibitors and nanoparticles. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive research and promising preclinical studies, a definite further agent in addition to fluoropyrimidines that consistently improves response rate has yet to be found. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-10-12 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6282533/ /pubmed/30311641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10993 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Clifford, R. Govindarajah, N. Parsons, J. L. Gollins, S. West, N. P. Vimalachandran, D. Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
title | Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
title_full | Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
title_short | Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
title_sort | systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30311641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cliffordr systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer AT govindarajahn systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer AT parsonsjl systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer AT gollinss systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer AT westnp systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer AT vimalachandrand systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer |