Cargando…

Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clifford, R., Govindarajah, N., Parsons, J. L., Gollins, S., West, N. P., Vimalachandran, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30311641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10993
_version_ 1783379014487900160
author Clifford, R.
Govindarajah, N.
Parsons, J. L.
Gollins, S.
West, N. P.
Vimalachandran, D.
author_facet Clifford, R.
Govindarajah, N.
Parsons, J. L.
Gollins, S.
West, N. P.
Vimalachandran, D.
author_sort Clifford, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to improve response and it is unclear what the clinical endpoints of such trials should be. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using preset search criteria across the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases from 1990 to 2017. Additional results were generated from the reference lists of included papers. RESULTS: A total of 123 papers were identified, of which 37 were included; a further 60 articles were obtained from additional referencing to give a total of 97 articles. Neoadjuvant radiosensitization for locally advanced rectal cancer using fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment. The oral derivative capecitabine has practical advantages over 5‐fluorouracil, with equal efficacy, but the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent has yet to show a consistent significant efficacy benefit in randomized clinical assessment. Preclinical and early‐phase trials are progressing with promising novel agents, such as small molecular inhibitors and nanoparticles. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive research and promising preclinical studies, a definite further agent in addition to fluoropyrimidines that consistently improves response rate has yet to be found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62825332018-12-11 Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer Clifford, R. Govindarajah, N. Parsons, J. L. Gollins, S. West, N. P. Vimalachandran, D. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: With the well established shift to neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, there is increasing focus on the use of radiosensitizers to improve the efficacy and tolerability of radiotherapy. There currently exist few randomized data exploring novel radiosensitizers to improve response and it is unclear what the clinical endpoints of such trials should be. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines using preset search criteria across the PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases from 1990 to 2017. Additional results were generated from the reference lists of included papers. RESULTS: A total of 123 papers were identified, of which 37 were included; a further 60 articles were obtained from additional referencing to give a total of 97 articles. Neoadjuvant radiosensitization for locally advanced rectal cancer using fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy remains the standard of treatment. The oral derivative capecitabine has practical advantages over 5‐fluorouracil, with equal efficacy, but the addition of a second chemotherapeutic agent has yet to show a consistent significant efficacy benefit in randomized clinical assessment. Preclinical and early‐phase trials are progressing with promising novel agents, such as small molecular inhibitors and nanoparticles. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive research and promising preclinical studies, a definite further agent in addition to fluoropyrimidines that consistently improves response rate has yet to be found. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2018-10-12 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6282533/ /pubmed/30311641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10993 Text en © 2018 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Clifford, R.
Govindarajah, N.
Parsons, J. L.
Gollins, S.
West, N. P.
Vimalachandran, D.
Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
title Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
title_full Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
title_fullStr Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
title_short Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
title_sort systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30311641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10993
work_keys_str_mv AT cliffordr systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer
AT govindarajahn systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer
AT parsonsjl systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer
AT gollinss systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer
AT westnp systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer
AT vimalachandrand systematicreviewoftreatmentintensificationusingnovelagentsforchemoradiotherapyinrectalcancer