Cargando…
Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic olfactory loss (IOL) accounts for a sizable fraction of olfactory dysfunction, but very little is known about its etiology and electrophysiological changes in the olfactory pathway. METHODS: We analyzed the physiology of IOL using chemosensory event‐related potentials (ERPs) (...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29782071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22144 |
_version_ | 1783379030794305536 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Jia Pinto, Jayant M. Yang, Ling Yao, Linyin Miao, Xutao Wei, Yongxiang |
author_facet | Liu, Jia Pinto, Jayant M. Yang, Ling Yao, Linyin Miao, Xutao Wei, Yongxiang |
author_sort | Liu, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Idiopathic olfactory loss (IOL) accounts for a sizable fraction of olfactory dysfunction, but very little is known about its etiology and electrophysiological changes in the olfactory pathway. METHODS: We analyzed the physiology of IOL using chemosensory event‐related potentials (ERPs) (olfactory and trigeminal: oERP and tERP) and olfactory pathway magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measured in adult patients with IOL and healthy controls. Subjective olfactory function was measured by Toyota and Takagi (T&T) olfactometry and Sniffin’ Sticks (SS). RESULTS: Olfactory function was worse in patients with IOL compared to controls (T&T, p < 0.001; SS, p < 0.001). oERPs could be evoked in 17 IOL patients. Signals in these patients showed lower amplitude in the N(1) and P(2) waves than controls (p < 0.05 for both), but there were no difference in latency between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). tERP were detected in all patients and controls; there were no differences in latency and nor amplitude between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). The olfactory bulb (OB) volume was significantly smaller in the IOL group than controls (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in the olfactory sulcus depth between groups (p > 0.05). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing magnitude of N(1) amplitude in oERPs (p < 0.05) and increasing OB volume (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IOL patients show neurophysiologic deficits and some anatomic differences compared to healthy controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6282607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62826072018-12-11 Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging Liu, Jia Pinto, Jayant M. Yang, Ling Yao, Linyin Miao, Xutao Wei, Yongxiang Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Idiopathic olfactory loss (IOL) accounts for a sizable fraction of olfactory dysfunction, but very little is known about its etiology and electrophysiological changes in the olfactory pathway. METHODS: We analyzed the physiology of IOL using chemosensory event‐related potentials (ERPs) (olfactory and trigeminal: oERP and tERP) and olfactory pathway magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measured in adult patients with IOL and healthy controls. Subjective olfactory function was measured by Toyota and Takagi (T&T) olfactometry and Sniffin’ Sticks (SS). RESULTS: Olfactory function was worse in patients with IOL compared to controls (T&T, p < 0.001; SS, p < 0.001). oERPs could be evoked in 17 IOL patients. Signals in these patients showed lower amplitude in the N(1) and P(2) waves than controls (p < 0.05 for both), but there were no difference in latency between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). tERP were detected in all patients and controls; there were no differences in latency and nor amplitude between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). The olfactory bulb (OB) volume was significantly smaller in the IOL group than controls (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in the olfactory sulcus depth between groups (p > 0.05). Better olfactory function was associated with increasing magnitude of N(1) amplitude in oERPs (p < 0.05) and increasing OB volume (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IOL patients show neurophysiologic deficits and some anatomic differences compared to healthy controls. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-05-21 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6282607/ /pubmed/29782071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22144 Text en © 2018 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Liu, Jia Pinto, Jayant M. Yang, Ling Yao, Linyin Miao, Xutao Wei, Yongxiang Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
title | Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full | Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_short | Evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
title_sort | evaluation of idiopathic olfactory loss with chemosensory event‐related potentials and magnetic resonance imaging |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29782071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22144 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liujia evaluationofidiopathicolfactorylosswithchemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsandmagneticresonanceimaging AT pintojayantm evaluationofidiopathicolfactorylosswithchemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsandmagneticresonanceimaging AT yangling evaluationofidiopathicolfactorylosswithchemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsandmagneticresonanceimaging AT yaolinyin evaluationofidiopathicolfactorylosswithchemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsandmagneticresonanceimaging AT miaoxutao evaluationofidiopathicolfactorylosswithchemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsandmagneticresonanceimaging AT weiyongxiang evaluationofidiopathicolfactorylosswithchemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsandmagneticresonanceimaging |