Cargando…

Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model

BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the number of people with ≥1 tattoo has increased noticeably within the European population. Despite this, limited safety information is available for tattoo inks. OBJECTIVES: To test the skin sensitization potential of 5 tattoo inks in vitro by using reconstructe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bil, Wieneke, van der Bent, Sebastiaan A. S., Spiekstra, Sander W., Nazmi, Kamran, Rustemeyer, Thomas, Gibbs, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13092
_version_ 1783379059115294720
author Bil, Wieneke
van der Bent, Sebastiaan A. S.
Spiekstra, Sander W.
Nazmi, Kamran
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Gibbs, Susan
author_facet Bil, Wieneke
van der Bent, Sebastiaan A. S.
Spiekstra, Sander W.
Nazmi, Kamran
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Gibbs, Susan
author_sort Bil, Wieneke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the number of people with ≥1 tattoo has increased noticeably within the European population. Despite this, limited safety information is available for tattoo inks. OBJECTIVES: To test the skin sensitization potential of 5 tattoo inks in vitro by using reconstructed human skin (RHS) and the contact sensitization biomarker interleukin (IL)‐18. METHODS: Two red and 3 black tattoo inks, 1 additive (Hamamelis virginiana extract) and 1 irritant control (lactic acid) were tested. The culture medium of RHS (reconstructed epidermis on a fibroblast‐populated collagen hydrogel) was supplemented with test substances in a dose‐dependent manner for 24 hours, after which cytotoxicity (histology; thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay) and skin sensitization potential (IL‐18 secretion; enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay) were assessed. RESULTS: All but 1 ink showed cytotoxicity. Notably, 1 red ink and 1 black ink were able to cause an inflammatory response, indicated by substantial release of IL‐18, suggesting that these inks may be contact sensitizers. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro RHS model showed that 4 tattoo inks were cytotoxic and 2 were able to cause an inflammatory IL‐18 response, indicating that an individual may develop allergic contact dermatitis when exposed to these tattoo inks, as they contain contact sensitizers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62827462018-12-11 Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model Bil, Wieneke van der Bent, Sebastiaan A. S. Spiekstra, Sander W. Nazmi, Kamran Rustemeyer, Thomas Gibbs, Susan Contact Dermatitis Original Articles BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the number of people with ≥1 tattoo has increased noticeably within the European population. Despite this, limited safety information is available for tattoo inks. OBJECTIVES: To test the skin sensitization potential of 5 tattoo inks in vitro by using reconstructed human skin (RHS) and the contact sensitization biomarker interleukin (IL)‐18. METHODS: Two red and 3 black tattoo inks, 1 additive (Hamamelis virginiana extract) and 1 irritant control (lactic acid) were tested. The culture medium of RHS (reconstructed epidermis on a fibroblast‐populated collagen hydrogel) was supplemented with test substances in a dose‐dependent manner for 24 hours, after which cytotoxicity (histology; thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide assay) and skin sensitization potential (IL‐18 secretion; enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay) were assessed. RESULTS: All but 1 ink showed cytotoxicity. Notably, 1 red ink and 1 black ink were able to cause an inflammatory response, indicated by substantial release of IL‐18, suggesting that these inks may be contact sensitizers. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro RHS model showed that 4 tattoo inks were cytotoxic and 2 were able to cause an inflammatory IL‐18 response, indicating that an individual may develop allergic contact dermatitis when exposed to these tattoo inks, as they contain contact sensitizers. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2018-08-22 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6282746/ /pubmed/30136287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13092 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bil, Wieneke
van der Bent, Sebastiaan A. S.
Spiekstra, Sander W.
Nazmi, Kamran
Rustemeyer, Thomas
Gibbs, Susan
Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
title Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
title_full Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
title_fullStr Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
title_short Comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
title_sort comparison of the skin sensitization potential of 3 red and 2 black tattoo inks using interleukin‐18 as a biomarker in a reconstructed human skin model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30136287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cod.13092
work_keys_str_mv AT bilwieneke comparisonoftheskinsensitizationpotentialof3redand2blacktattooinksusinginterleukin18asabiomarkerinareconstructedhumanskinmodel
AT vanderbentsebastiaanas comparisonoftheskinsensitizationpotentialof3redand2blacktattooinksusinginterleukin18asabiomarkerinareconstructedhumanskinmodel
AT spiekstrasanderw comparisonoftheskinsensitizationpotentialof3redand2blacktattooinksusinginterleukin18asabiomarkerinareconstructedhumanskinmodel
AT nazmikamran comparisonoftheskinsensitizationpotentialof3redand2blacktattooinksusinginterleukin18asabiomarkerinareconstructedhumanskinmodel
AT rustemeyerthomas comparisonoftheskinsensitizationpotentialof3redand2blacktattooinksusinginterleukin18asabiomarkerinareconstructedhumanskinmodel
AT gibbssusan comparisonoftheskinsensitizationpotentialof3redand2blacktattooinksusinginterleukin18asabiomarkerinareconstructedhumanskinmodel