Cargando…

Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network

Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are among the most important pollinators, although they attract less attention than bees. They are usually thought to be rather opportunistic flower visitors, although previous studied demonstrated that they show colour preferences and their nectar feeding is affected...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klecka, Jan, Hadrava, Jiří, Biella, Paolo, Akter, Asma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533311
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6025
_version_ 1783379093385904128
author Klecka, Jan
Hadrava, Jiří
Biella, Paolo
Akter, Asma
author_facet Klecka, Jan
Hadrava, Jiří
Biella, Paolo
Akter, Asma
author_sort Klecka, Jan
collection PubMed
description Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are among the most important pollinators, although they attract less attention than bees. They are usually thought to be rather opportunistic flower visitors, although previous studied demonstrated that they show colour preferences and their nectar feeding is affected by morphological constraints related to flower morphology. Despite the growing appreciation of hoverflies and other non-bee insects as pollinators, there is a lack of community-wide studies of flower visitation by syrphids. The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed analysis of flower visitation patterns in a species rich community of syrphids in a Central European grassland and to evaluate how species traits shape the structure of the plant-hoverfly flower visitation network. We found that different species varied in the level of specialisation, and while some species visited a similar spectre of flowers, others partitioned resources more strongly. There was a consistent difference in both specialisation and flower preferences between three syrphid subfamilies. Eristalinae and Pipizinae were more specialised than Syrphinae. Trait-based analyses showed that relative flower visitation (i) increased with plant height, but most strongly in Eristalinae; (ii) increased with inflorescence size in small species from all three subfamilies, but was independent of inflorescence size in large species of Eristalinae and Syrphinae; and (iii) depended on flower colour, but in a subfamily-specific way. Eristalinae showed the strongest flower colour preferences for white flowers, Pipizinae visited mostly white and yellow flowers, while Syrphinae were less affected by flower colour. Exploration of the structure of the plant-hoverfly flower visitation network showed that the network was both modular and nested. We also found that there were almost no differences in specialisation and relative visitation frequency between males and females. Overall, we showed that flower visitation in syrphids was affected by phylogenetic relatedness, body size of syrphids and several plant traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62829412018-12-07 Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network Klecka, Jan Hadrava, Jiří Biella, Paolo Akter, Asma PeerJ Biodiversity Hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are among the most important pollinators, although they attract less attention than bees. They are usually thought to be rather opportunistic flower visitors, although previous studied demonstrated that they show colour preferences and their nectar feeding is affected by morphological constraints related to flower morphology. Despite the growing appreciation of hoverflies and other non-bee insects as pollinators, there is a lack of community-wide studies of flower visitation by syrphids. The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed analysis of flower visitation patterns in a species rich community of syrphids in a Central European grassland and to evaluate how species traits shape the structure of the plant-hoverfly flower visitation network. We found that different species varied in the level of specialisation, and while some species visited a similar spectre of flowers, others partitioned resources more strongly. There was a consistent difference in both specialisation and flower preferences between three syrphid subfamilies. Eristalinae and Pipizinae were more specialised than Syrphinae. Trait-based analyses showed that relative flower visitation (i) increased with plant height, but most strongly in Eristalinae; (ii) increased with inflorescence size in small species from all three subfamilies, but was independent of inflorescence size in large species of Eristalinae and Syrphinae; and (iii) depended on flower colour, but in a subfamily-specific way. Eristalinae showed the strongest flower colour preferences for white flowers, Pipizinae visited mostly white and yellow flowers, while Syrphinae were less affected by flower colour. Exploration of the structure of the plant-hoverfly flower visitation network showed that the network was both modular and nested. We also found that there were almost no differences in specialisation and relative visitation frequency between males and females. Overall, we showed that flower visitation in syrphids was affected by phylogenetic relatedness, body size of syrphids and several plant traits. PeerJ Inc. 2018-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6282941/ /pubmed/30533311 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6025 Text en ©2018 Klecka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Klecka, Jan
Hadrava, Jiří
Biella, Paolo
Akter, Asma
Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
title Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
title_full Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
title_fullStr Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
title_full_unstemmed Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
title_short Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
title_sort flower visitation by hoverflies (diptera: syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533311
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6025
work_keys_str_mv AT kleckajan flowervisitationbyhoverfliesdipterasyrphidaeinatemperateplantpollinatornetwork
AT hadravajiri flowervisitationbyhoverfliesdipterasyrphidaeinatemperateplantpollinatornetwork
AT biellapaolo flowervisitationbyhoverfliesdipterasyrphidaeinatemperateplantpollinatornetwork
AT akterasma flowervisitationbyhoverfliesdipterasyrphidaeinatemperateplantpollinatornetwork