Cargando…

Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes

The design, synthesis and formulation of non‐viral gene delivery vectors is an area of renewed research interest. Amongst the most efficient non‐viral gene delivery systems are lipopolyplexes, in which cationic peptides are co‐formulated with plasmid DNA and lipids. One advantage of lipopolyplex vec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bofinger, Robin, Zaw‐Thin, May, Mitchell, Nicholas J., Patrick, P. Stephen, Stowe, Cassandra, Gomez‐Ramirez, Ana, Hailes, Helen C., Kalber, Tammy L., Tabor, Alethea B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psc.3131
_version_ 1783379098605715456
author Bofinger, Robin
Zaw‐Thin, May
Mitchell, Nicholas J.
Patrick, P. Stephen
Stowe, Cassandra
Gomez‐Ramirez, Ana
Hailes, Helen C.
Kalber, Tammy L.
Tabor, Alethea B.
author_facet Bofinger, Robin
Zaw‐Thin, May
Mitchell, Nicholas J.
Patrick, P. Stephen
Stowe, Cassandra
Gomez‐Ramirez, Ana
Hailes, Helen C.
Kalber, Tammy L.
Tabor, Alethea B.
author_sort Bofinger, Robin
collection PubMed
description The design, synthesis and formulation of non‐viral gene delivery vectors is an area of renewed research interest. Amongst the most efficient non‐viral gene delivery systems are lipopolyplexes, in which cationic peptides are co‐formulated with plasmid DNA and lipids. One advantage of lipopolyplex vectors is that they have the potential to be targeted to specific cell types by attaching peptide targeting ligands on the surface, thus increasing both the transfection efficiency and selectivity for disease targets such as cancer cells. In this paper, we have investigated two different modes of displaying cell‐specific peptide targeting ligands at the surface of lipopolyplexes. Lipopolyplexes formulated with bimodal peptides, with both receptor binding and DNA condensing sequences, were compared with lipopolyplexes with the peptide targeting ligand directly conjugated to one of the lipids. Three EGFR targeting peptide sequences were studied, together with a range of lipid formulations and maleimide lipid structures. The biophysical properties of the lipopolyplexes and their transfection efficiencies in a basal‐like breast cancer cell line were investigated using plasmid DNA bearing genes for the expression of firefly luciferase and green fluorescent protein. Fluorescence quenching experiments were also used to probe the macromolecular organisation of the peptide and pDNA components of the lipopolyplexes. We demonstrated that both approaches to lipopolyplex targeting give reasonable transfection efficiencies, and the transfection efficiency of each lipopolyplex formulation is highly dependent on the sequence of the targeting peptide. To achieve maximum therapeutic efficiency, different peptide targeting sequences and lipopolyplex architectures should be investigated for each target cell type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62829632018-12-14 Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes Bofinger, Robin Zaw‐Thin, May Mitchell, Nicholas J. Patrick, P. Stephen Stowe, Cassandra Gomez‐Ramirez, Ana Hailes, Helen C. Kalber, Tammy L. Tabor, Alethea B. J Pept Sci Research Articles The design, synthesis and formulation of non‐viral gene delivery vectors is an area of renewed research interest. Amongst the most efficient non‐viral gene delivery systems are lipopolyplexes, in which cationic peptides are co‐formulated with plasmid DNA and lipids. One advantage of lipopolyplex vectors is that they have the potential to be targeted to specific cell types by attaching peptide targeting ligands on the surface, thus increasing both the transfection efficiency and selectivity for disease targets such as cancer cells. In this paper, we have investigated two different modes of displaying cell‐specific peptide targeting ligands at the surface of lipopolyplexes. Lipopolyplexes formulated with bimodal peptides, with both receptor binding and DNA condensing sequences, were compared with lipopolyplexes with the peptide targeting ligand directly conjugated to one of the lipids. Three EGFR targeting peptide sequences were studied, together with a range of lipid formulations and maleimide lipid structures. The biophysical properties of the lipopolyplexes and their transfection efficiencies in a basal‐like breast cancer cell line were investigated using plasmid DNA bearing genes for the expression of firefly luciferase and green fluorescent protein. Fluorescence quenching experiments were also used to probe the macromolecular organisation of the peptide and pDNA components of the lipopolyplexes. We demonstrated that both approaches to lipopolyplex targeting give reasonable transfection efficiencies, and the transfection efficiency of each lipopolyplex formulation is highly dependent on the sequence of the targeting peptide. To achieve maximum therapeutic efficiency, different peptide targeting sequences and lipopolyplex architectures should be investigated for each target cell type. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-16 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6282963/ /pubmed/30325562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psc.3131 Text en © 2018 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Bofinger, Robin
Zaw‐Thin, May
Mitchell, Nicholas J.
Patrick, P. Stephen
Stowe, Cassandra
Gomez‐Ramirez, Ana
Hailes, Helen C.
Kalber, Tammy L.
Tabor, Alethea B.
Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
title Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
title_full Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
title_fullStr Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
title_full_unstemmed Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
title_short Development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: A comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
title_sort development of lipopolyplexes for gene delivery: a comparison of the effects of differing modes of targeting peptide display on the structure and transfection activities of lipopolyplexes
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325562
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/psc.3131
work_keys_str_mv AT bofingerrobin developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT zawthinmay developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT mitchellnicholasj developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT patrickpstephen developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT stowecassandra developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT gomezramirezana developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT haileshelenc developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT kalbertammyl developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes
AT taboraletheab developmentoflipopolyplexesforgenedeliveryacomparisonoftheeffectsofdifferingmodesoftargetingpeptidedisplayonthestructureandtransfectionactivitiesoflipopolyplexes