Cargando…

Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river

Cohesive floodplain sediment and vegetation are both thought to cause meandering river patterns. Our aims are to compare the isolated and combined effects of mud and vegetation on river planform and morphodynamics in the setting of intermediate‐sized valley rivers. We use a numerical model for centu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kleinhans, Maarten G., de Vries, Bente, Braat, Lisanne, van Oorschot, Mijke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.4437
_version_ 1783379099546288128
author Kleinhans, Maarten G.
de Vries, Bente
Braat, Lisanne
van Oorschot, Mijke
author_facet Kleinhans, Maarten G.
de Vries, Bente
Braat, Lisanne
van Oorschot, Mijke
author_sort Kleinhans, Maarten G.
collection PubMed
description Cohesive floodplain sediment and vegetation are both thought to cause meandering river patterns. Our aims are to compare the isolated and combined effects of mud and vegetation on river planform and morphodynamics in the setting of intermediate‐sized valley rivers. We use a numerical model for century‐scale simulation of flow, sediment transport and morphology coupled with riparian vegetation settlement, growth and mortality as functions of species traits on which flow resistance depends. Mud fluxes were predicted by excess shear stress relations in combination with the active layer formulation. We found that valley‐flooding water levels increase with vegetation density, causing a higher braiding intensity rather than meandering tendency. The shear stress during floods carves channels through the muddy floodplain surface. Higher mud concentration, on the other hand, increases floodplain aggradation, reduces the overbank flow frequency and ultimately causes formation of a single‐thread channel. Vegetation causes mud to deposit closer to the river channel as a levee, showing that mud sedimentation and vegetation settling mutually enhance floodplain formation. However, mud and vegetation counteract in two ways. First, vegetation enhances floodplain accretion, which ultimately increases plant desiccation for high mud concentrations. Second, vegetation increases the tendency of periodic chute cutoffs in valleys. The chute cutoffs locally reset the landscape and create new windows of opportunity for the vegetation. Surprisingly, in systems with a high mud concentration this causes hysteretic loops of vegetation cover and delayed mud deposition. Ramifications for the interpretation of Palaeozoic fluvial facies are that even rootless vegetation, capturing cohesive mud closer to the river channel to form thicker floodplain on the point bar, can enhance the tendency to meander and, under high mud supply, form stable channels. However, meandering is more unlikely in narrower valley rivers with higher vegetation density. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6282967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62829672018-12-14 Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river Kleinhans, Maarten G. de Vries, Bente Braat, Lisanne van Oorschot, Mijke Earth Surf Process Landf Research Articles Cohesive floodplain sediment and vegetation are both thought to cause meandering river patterns. Our aims are to compare the isolated and combined effects of mud and vegetation on river planform and morphodynamics in the setting of intermediate‐sized valley rivers. We use a numerical model for century‐scale simulation of flow, sediment transport and morphology coupled with riparian vegetation settlement, growth and mortality as functions of species traits on which flow resistance depends. Mud fluxes were predicted by excess shear stress relations in combination with the active layer formulation. We found that valley‐flooding water levels increase with vegetation density, causing a higher braiding intensity rather than meandering tendency. The shear stress during floods carves channels through the muddy floodplain surface. Higher mud concentration, on the other hand, increases floodplain aggradation, reduces the overbank flow frequency and ultimately causes formation of a single‐thread channel. Vegetation causes mud to deposit closer to the river channel as a levee, showing that mud sedimentation and vegetation settling mutually enhance floodplain formation. However, mud and vegetation counteract in two ways. First, vegetation enhances floodplain accretion, which ultimately increases plant desiccation for high mud concentrations. Second, vegetation increases the tendency of periodic chute cutoffs in valleys. The chute cutoffs locally reset the landscape and create new windows of opportunity for the vegetation. Surprisingly, in systems with a high mud concentration this causes hysteretic loops of vegetation cover and delayed mud deposition. Ramifications for the interpretation of Palaeozoic fluvial facies are that even rootless vegetation, capturing cohesive mud closer to the river channel to form thicker floodplain on the point bar, can enhance the tendency to meander and, under high mud supply, form stable channels. However, meandering is more unlikely in narrower valley rivers with higher vegetation density. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-20 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6282967/ /pubmed/30555199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.4437 Text en © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Kleinhans, Maarten G.
de Vries, Bente
Braat, Lisanne
van Oorschot, Mijke
Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
title Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
title_full Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
title_fullStr Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
title_full_unstemmed Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
title_short Living landscapes: Muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
title_sort living landscapes: muddy and vegetated floodplain effects on fluvial pattern in an incised river
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6282967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30555199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.4437
work_keys_str_mv AT kleinhansmaarteng livinglandscapesmuddyandvegetatedfloodplaineffectsonfluvialpatterninanincisedriver
AT devriesbente livinglandscapesmuddyandvegetatedfloodplaineffectsonfluvialpatterninanincisedriver
AT braatlisanne livinglandscapesmuddyandvegetatedfloodplaineffectsonfluvialpatterninanincisedriver
AT vanoorschotmijke livinglandscapesmuddyandvegetatedfloodplaineffectsonfluvialpatterninanincisedriver