Cargando…

Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce perioperative complications in many types of surgeries. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS to major spinal surgery. The current study was performed to comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jun, Li, Hao, Xv, Zheng-kuan, Wang, Jian, Yu, Qun-fei, Chen, Gang, Li, Fang-cai, Ren, Ying, Chen, Qi-xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30508899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013195
_version_ 1783379128870764544
author Li, Jun
Li, Hao
Xv, Zheng-kuan
Wang, Jian
Yu, Qun-fei
Chen, Gang
Li, Fang-cai
Ren, Ying
Chen, Qi-xin
author_facet Li, Jun
Li, Hao
Xv, Zheng-kuan
Wang, Jian
Yu, Qun-fei
Chen, Gang
Li, Fang-cai
Ren, Ying
Chen, Qi-xin
author_sort Li, Jun
collection PubMed
description Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce perioperative complications in many types of surgeries. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS to major spinal surgery. The current study was performed to compare complications and hospital stay after laminoplasty between an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The ERAS group included 114 patients who underwent laminoplasty managed with an ERAS protocol between January 2016 and June 2017. The traditional care group included 110 patients, who received traditional perioperative care between November 2014 and December 2015. Postoperative hospital stay (POPH), physiological function, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The mean POPH was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than traditional care group (5.75 ± 2.46 vs. 7.67 ± 3.45 d, P < .001). ERAS protocol significantly promoted postoperative early food-taking (8.45 ± 2.94 h vs 21.64 ± 2.66 h, P < .001), reduced the first time of assisted walking (30.79 ± 14.45 vs. 65.24 ± 25.34 h, P < .001), postoperative time of indwelling urinary catheters (24.76 ± 12.34 vs. 53.61 ± 18.16 h, P < .001), and wound drainage catheters (43.92 ± 7.14 vs. 48.85 ± 10.10 h, P < .001), as compared with the traditional care group. Pain control was better in the ERAS group than traditional care group in terms of mean VAS score (2.72 ± 0.46 vs. 3.35 ± 0.46, P < .001) and mean maximum VAS score (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 4.35 ± 1.15, P < .001) in 3 days after surgery. The morbidity rate was 21.05% (24 of 114 patients) in the ERAS group and 20.90% (23 of 110 patients) in the control group (P = .75). The ERAS protocol is both safe and feasible for patients undergoing laminoplasty, and can decrease the length of postoperative hospitalization without increasing the risk of complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6283133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62831332018-12-26 Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study Li, Jun Li, Hao Xv, Zheng-kuan Wang, Jian Yu, Qun-fei Chen, Gang Li, Fang-cai Ren, Ying Chen, Qi-xin Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been shown to shorten length of hospital stay and reduce perioperative complications in many types of surgeries. However, there has been a paucity of research examining the application of ERAS to major spinal surgery. The current study was performed to compare complications and hospital stay after laminoplasty between an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The ERAS group included 114 patients who underwent laminoplasty managed with an ERAS protocol between January 2016 and June 2017. The traditional care group included 110 patients, who received traditional perioperative care between November 2014 and December 2015. Postoperative hospital stay (POPH), physiological function, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, and postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups. The mean POPH was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than traditional care group (5.75 ± 2.46 vs. 7.67 ± 3.45 d, P < .001). ERAS protocol significantly promoted postoperative early food-taking (8.45 ± 2.94 h vs 21.64 ± 2.66 h, P < .001), reduced the first time of assisted walking (30.79 ± 14.45 vs. 65.24 ± 25.34 h, P < .001), postoperative time of indwelling urinary catheters (24.76 ± 12.34 vs. 53.61 ± 18.16 h, P < .001), and wound drainage catheters (43.92 ± 7.14 vs. 48.85 ± 10.10 h, P < .001), as compared with the traditional care group. Pain control was better in the ERAS group than traditional care group in terms of mean VAS score (2.72 ± 0.46 vs. 3.35 ± 0.46, P < .001) and mean maximum VAS score (3.76 ± 1.12 vs. 4.35 ± 1.15, P < .001) in 3 days after surgery. The morbidity rate was 21.05% (24 of 114 patients) in the ERAS group and 20.90% (23 of 110 patients) in the control group (P = .75). The ERAS protocol is both safe and feasible for patients undergoing laminoplasty, and can decrease the length of postoperative hospitalization without increasing the risk of complications. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6283133/ /pubmed/30508899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013195 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jun
Li, Hao
Xv, Zheng-kuan
Wang, Jian
Yu, Qun-fei
Chen, Gang
Li, Fang-cai
Ren, Ying
Chen, Qi-xin
Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
title Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
title_full Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
title_fullStr Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
title_short Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study
title_sort enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: a retrospective case-cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30508899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013195
work_keys_str_mv AT lijun enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT lihao enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT xvzhengkuan enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT wangjian enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT yuqunfei enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT chengang enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT lifangcai enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT renying enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy
AT chenqixin enhancedrecoverycareversustraditionalcarefollowinglaminoplastyaretrospectivecasecohortstudy