Cargando…

Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Successful labor induction depends on the cervical status at the time of induction. Currently, both a Foley catheter and a dinoprostone insert are used for effective cervical ripening. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the intracervical Foley catheter and dinoprostone insert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Zhu, Lixia, Zhang, Cong, Cao, Fang, Liu, Qin, Gu, Xing, Xu, Jianhao, Li, Jianqing
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30508911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013251

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
por: Abdi, Nazanin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Intracervical Foley Catheter Plus Intravaginal Misoprostol vs Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening: A Meta-Analysis
por: Lee, Howard Hao, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients
por: Yan, Jinjing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert versus Cervical Ripening Balloon for Term Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparas—A Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Lauterbach, Roy, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary With Transcervical Balloon Catheter Plus Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial
por: M, Kanagavarshani, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prediction of an effective cervical ripenning in the induction of labour using vaginal dinoprostone
por: López Jiménez, Nuria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
por: Bhide, Amarnath, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review
por: Sangram Singh, Biswambhar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cervical ripening in prolonged pregnancies by silicone double balloon catheter versus vaginal dinoprostone slow release system: The MAGPOP randomised controlled trial
por: Diguisto, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A mathematical model to predict mean time to delivery following cervical ripening with dinoprostone vaginal insert
por: Levast, Fanny, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Patient Pain and Satisfaction With 10, 30, and 70 mL Transcervical Foley Balloons for Cervical Ripening During Induction of Labor
por: Dombrovsky, Inessa, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Balloon bursting: transurethral puncture of a Foley catheter balloon
por: Smith, Stephanie F, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study
por: Ting, Ning-Shiuan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Severe Hemorrhage from Cervical Cancer Managed with Foley Catheter Balloon Tamponade
por: Sonoo, Tomohiro, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis
por: Liu, Xiyao, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Risk of Cesarean Delivery after Vaginal Inserts with Prostaglandin Analogs and Single-Balloon Catheter Used for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies
por: Diguisto, Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
por: Devillard, Eric, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Sublingual Misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension: A randomized control trial
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comparison of the effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheter in term nulliparous women with borderline oligohydramnios
por: Zhang, Yongqing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Improving Foley Catheter Insertion Procedure by Developing Foley Introducer: A 100-Year Overdue Innovation
por: Kim, Khae Hawn, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor
por: Bhatia, Anju, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of labour in pre-eclamptic women: a randomised trial comparing the Foley balloon catheter with oral misoprostol
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial
por: Chia, Hang Min, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Predictor Factors in the Success of Slow-Release Dinoprostone Used for Cervical Ripening in Pregnancies with Premature Rupture of Membranes
por: Obut, Mehmet, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter
por: Flament, Emeline, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

"Egg shell” in bladder: A calculus around neglected Foley balloon catheter
por: Singh, Dharamveer, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

A fragment of Foley catheter balloon as a cause of Bladder stone in woman
por: Aziz, El Majdoub, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Gu, Ning, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labor in Women with Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Prospective Study
por: Anh, Nguyen Duy, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Removing Nasal Packing in Epistaxis: What to Do in the Case of an Undeflatable Foley Catheter Balloon
por: Gaspar-Sobrinho, Fernando Pena, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Double Balloon Cervical Ripening Catheter for Control of Massive Hemorrhage in a Cervical Ectopic Pregnancy
por: Zambrano, Nabila, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
por: Lapuente-Ocamica, O., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_lt2nttl0sq60f7ue56bu99dp2q