Cargando…

Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: This systemic review aimed to explore the predictors of discharge and neurologic outcome of adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to provide references for patient selection. METHODS: Electronically searching of the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and manual retriev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Junhong, Ma, Qingbian, Zhang, Hua, Liu, Shaoyu, Zheng, Yaan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30508912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013257
_version_ 1783379137688240128
author Wang, Junhong
Ma, Qingbian
Zhang, Hua
Liu, Shaoyu
Zheng, Yaan
author_facet Wang, Junhong
Ma, Qingbian
Zhang, Hua
Liu, Shaoyu
Zheng, Yaan
author_sort Wang, Junhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This systemic review aimed to explore the predictors of discharge and neurologic outcome of adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to provide references for patient selection. METHODS: Electronically searching of the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and manual retrieval were done for clinical trials about predictors for adult ECPR which were published between January 2000 and January 2018 and included predictors for discharge and neurologic outcome. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the baseline information and interested outcomes were extracted. Two reviewers assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies and the quality of evidence for summary estimates independently. Pooled mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by Review Manager Software 5.3. At last the quality of evidence for summary estimates was appraised according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating system. RESULTS: In 16 studies, 1162 patients were enrolled. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36–0.93, P = .02), in-hospital CA (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.08–2.77, P = .02), witnessed CA (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.18–22.88, P = .01), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 7.35, 95% CI 2.32–23.25, P < .01), initial shockable rhythm (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.53–3.42, P < .01), 1st recorded nonshockable rhythm (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.66, P < .01), CPR duration (MD −13.84 minutes, 95% CI −21 to −6.69, P < .0001), arrest-to-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (MD −17.88 minutes, 95% CI −23.59 to −12.17, P < .01), PH (MD 0.14, 95% CI 0.08–0.21, P < .01), lactate (MD −3.66 mmol/L, 95% CI −7.15 to −0.17, P = .04), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02–2.58, P = .04)were identified as the survival predictors of ECPR. Shockable rhythm (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.20–4.52, P = .01) and CPR duration (MD −9.85 minutes, 95% CI −15.71 to −3.99, P = .001) were identified as the neurologic outcome predictors of ECPR. CONCLUSION: Current evidence showed that in-hospital CA, witnessed CA, bystander CPR, initial shockable rhythm, shorter CPR duration and arrest-to-ECMO duration, higher baseline PH, lower baseline lactate and PCI were favourable survival predictors of adult ECPR, and shockable rhythm and shorter CPR duration were good neurological outcome predictors of adult ECPR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6283197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62831972018-12-26 Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis Wang, Junhong Ma, Qingbian Zhang, Hua Liu, Shaoyu Zheng, Yaan Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: This systemic review aimed to explore the predictors of discharge and neurologic outcome of adult extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to provide references for patient selection. METHODS: Electronically searching of the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and manual retrieval were done for clinical trials about predictors for adult ECPR which were published between January 2000 and January 2018 and included predictors for discharge and neurologic outcome. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the baseline information and interested outcomes were extracted. Two reviewers assessed the methodologic quality of the included studies and the quality of evidence for summary estimates independently. Pooled mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by Review Manager Software 5.3. At last the quality of evidence for summary estimates was appraised according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation rating system. RESULTS: In 16 studies, 1162 patients were enrolled. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36–0.93, P = .02), in-hospital CA (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.08–2.77, P = .02), witnessed CA (OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.18–22.88, P = .01), bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 7.35, 95% CI 2.32–23.25, P < .01), initial shockable rhythm (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.53–3.42, P < .01), 1st recorded nonshockable rhythm (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29–0.66, P < .01), CPR duration (MD −13.84 minutes, 95% CI −21 to −6.69, P < .0001), arrest-to-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (MD −17.88 minutes, 95% CI −23.59 to −12.17, P < .01), PH (MD 0.14, 95% CI 0.08–0.21, P < .01), lactate (MD −3.66 mmol/L, 95% CI −7.15 to −0.17, P = .04), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.02–2.58, P = .04)were identified as the survival predictors of ECPR. Shockable rhythm (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.20–4.52, P = .01) and CPR duration (MD −9.85 minutes, 95% CI −15.71 to −3.99, P = .001) were identified as the neurologic outcome predictors of ECPR. CONCLUSION: Current evidence showed that in-hospital CA, witnessed CA, bystander CPR, initial shockable rhythm, shorter CPR duration and arrest-to-ECMO duration, higher baseline PH, lower baseline lactate and PCI were favourable survival predictors of adult ECPR, and shockable rhythm and shorter CPR duration were good neurological outcome predictors of adult ECPR. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6283197/ /pubmed/30508912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013257 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Junhong
Ma, Qingbian
Zhang, Hua
Liu, Shaoyu
Zheng, Yaan
Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_short Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis
title_sort predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systemic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30508912
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000013257
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjunhong predictorsofsurvivalandneurologicoutcomeforadultswithextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maqingbian predictorsofsurvivalandneurologicoutcomeforadultswithextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhanghua predictorsofsurvivalandneurologicoutcomeforadultswithextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liushaoyu predictorsofsurvivalandneurologicoutcomeforadultswithextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhengyaan predictorsofsurvivalandneurologicoutcomeforadultswithextracorporealcardiopulmonaryresuscitationasystemicreviewandmetaanalysis