Cargando…
An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment
Analytical similarity assessment of critical quality attributes (CQAs) serves as a foundation for the development of biosimilar products and facilitates an abbreviated subsequent clinical evaluation. In this study, we establish a statistical evaluation roadmap with statistical approaches for some se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208354 |
_version_ | 1783379169067925504 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Kejian Pan, Haitao Li, Chen Zhao, Qingbo Wang, Ling Xia, Jielai |
author_facet | Wu, Kejian Pan, Haitao Li, Chen Zhao, Qingbo Wang, Ling Xia, Jielai |
author_sort | Wu, Kejian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Analytical similarity assessment of critical quality attributes (CQAs) serves as a foundation for the development of biosimilar products and facilitates an abbreviated subsequent clinical evaluation. In this study, we establish a statistical evaluation roadmap with statistical approaches for some selected CQAs from Tier 1, because they are most relevant to clinical outcomes and require the most rigorous statistical methods. In the roadmap, we incorporate 3 methods—ranking and tier assignment of quality attributes, the equivalence test, and the Mann–Whitney test for equivalence—that are important to determine analytical similarity between the reference and biosimilar products. For the equivalence test, we develop a power calculation formula based on the two one-sided tests procedure. Exact sample sizes can be numerically calculated. Then, we propose a flexible idea for selecting the number of reference lots (n(R)) and the number of biosimilar lots (n(T)) to adjust for serious unbalanced sample sizes. From results of extensive simulations under various parameter settings, we obtain a workable strategy to determine the optimum sample size combination (n(T), n(R)) for the equivalence test of CQAs from Tier 1. R codes are provided to facilitate implementation of the roadmap and corresponding methods in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6283468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62834682018-12-20 An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment Wu, Kejian Pan, Haitao Li, Chen Zhao, Qingbo Wang, Ling Xia, Jielai PLoS One Research Article Analytical similarity assessment of critical quality attributes (CQAs) serves as a foundation for the development of biosimilar products and facilitates an abbreviated subsequent clinical evaluation. In this study, we establish a statistical evaluation roadmap with statistical approaches for some selected CQAs from Tier 1, because they are most relevant to clinical outcomes and require the most rigorous statistical methods. In the roadmap, we incorporate 3 methods—ranking and tier assignment of quality attributes, the equivalence test, and the Mann–Whitney test for equivalence—that are important to determine analytical similarity between the reference and biosimilar products. For the equivalence test, we develop a power calculation formula based on the two one-sided tests procedure. Exact sample sizes can be numerically calculated. Then, we propose a flexible idea for selecting the number of reference lots (n(R)) and the number of biosimilar lots (n(T)) to adjust for serious unbalanced sample sizes. From results of extensive simulations under various parameter settings, we obtain a workable strategy to determine the optimum sample size combination (n(T), n(R)) for the equivalence test of CQAs from Tier 1. R codes are provided to facilitate implementation of the roadmap and corresponding methods in practice. Public Library of Science 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6283468/ /pubmed/30521581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208354 Text en © 2018 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Kejian Pan, Haitao Li, Chen Zhao, Qingbo Wang, Ling Xia, Jielai An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
title | An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
title_full | An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
title_fullStr | An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
title_short | An evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
title_sort | evaluation roadmap for critical quality attributes from tier 1 in analytical similarity assessment |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wukejian anevaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT panhaitao anevaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT lichen anevaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT zhaoqingbo anevaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT wangling anevaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT xiajielai anevaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT wukejian evaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT panhaitao evaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT lichen evaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT zhaoqingbo evaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT wangling evaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment AT xiajielai evaluationroadmapforcriticalqualityattributesfromtier1inanalyticalsimilarityassessment |