Cargando…

Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review

Prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA), a case-only design introduced in 1996, has been increasingly used to identify unintentional drug effects, and has potential applications as a hypothesis-testing and a hypothesis-generating method, due to its easy application and effective control of ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Idema, Demy L., Wang, Yuanyuan, Biehl, Michael, Horvatovich, Peter L., Hak, Eelko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208389
_version_ 1783379196672737280
author Idema, Demy L.
Wang, Yuanyuan
Biehl, Michael
Horvatovich, Peter L.
Hak, Eelko
author_facet Idema, Demy L.
Wang, Yuanyuan
Biehl, Michael
Horvatovich, Peter L.
Hak, Eelko
author_sort Idema, Demy L.
collection PubMed
description Prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA), a case-only design introduced in 1996, has been increasingly used to identify unintentional drug effects, and has potential applications as a hypothesis-testing and a hypothesis-generating method, due to its easy application and effective control of time-invariant confounders. The aim of this study is to systematically compare effect estimates from the PSSA to effect estimates from conventional observational parallel group study designs, to assess the validity and constraints of the PSSA study design. We reviewed the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases until February 2016 to identify studies that compared PSSA to a parallel group design. Data from the eligible articles was extracted and analyzed, including making a Bland-Altman plot and calculating the number of discrepancies between the designs. 63 comparisons (from two studies) were included in the review. There was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the effect estimates of the PSSA and the parallel group designs, but the bias indicated by the Bland-Altman plot (0.20) and the percentage of discrepancies (70–80%) showed that this correlation was not accompanied by a considerable similarity of the effect estimates. Overall, the effect estimates of the parallel group designs were higher than those of the PSSA, not necessarily further away from 1, and the parallel group designs also generated more significant signals. However, these results should be approached with caution, as the effect estimates were only retrieved from two separate studies. This review indicates that, even though PSSA has a lot of potential, the effect estimates generated by the PSSA are usually lower than the effect estimates generated by parallel group designs, and PSSA mostly has a lower power than the conventional study designs, but this is based on limited comparisons, and more comparisons are needed to make a proper conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6283622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62836222018-12-19 Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review Idema, Demy L. Wang, Yuanyuan Biehl, Michael Horvatovich, Peter L. Hak, Eelko PLoS One Research Article Prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA), a case-only design introduced in 1996, has been increasingly used to identify unintentional drug effects, and has potential applications as a hypothesis-testing and a hypothesis-generating method, due to its easy application and effective control of time-invariant confounders. The aim of this study is to systematically compare effect estimates from the PSSA to effect estimates from conventional observational parallel group study designs, to assess the validity and constraints of the PSSA study design. We reviewed the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases until February 2016 to identify studies that compared PSSA to a parallel group design. Data from the eligible articles was extracted and analyzed, including making a Bland-Altman plot and calculating the number of discrepancies between the designs. 63 comparisons (from two studies) were included in the review. There was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the effect estimates of the PSSA and the parallel group designs, but the bias indicated by the Bland-Altman plot (0.20) and the percentage of discrepancies (70–80%) showed that this correlation was not accompanied by a considerable similarity of the effect estimates. Overall, the effect estimates of the parallel group designs were higher than those of the PSSA, not necessarily further away from 1, and the parallel group designs also generated more significant signals. However, these results should be approached with caution, as the effect estimates were only retrieved from two separate studies. This review indicates that, even though PSSA has a lot of potential, the effect estimates generated by the PSSA are usually lower than the effect estimates generated by parallel group designs, and PSSA mostly has a lower power than the conventional study designs, but this is based on limited comparisons, and more comparisons are needed to make a proper conclusion. Public Library of Science 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6283622/ /pubmed/30521568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208389 Text en © 2018 Idema et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Idema, Demy L.
Wang, Yuanyuan
Biehl, Michael
Horvatovich, Peter L.
Hak, Eelko
Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review
title Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review
title_full Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review
title_fullStr Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review
title_short Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review
title_sort effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (pssa) and parallel group study designs: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208389
work_keys_str_mv AT idemademyl effectestimatecomparisonbetweentheprescriptionsequencesymmetryanalysispssaandparallelgroupstudydesignsasystematicreview
AT wangyuanyuan effectestimatecomparisonbetweentheprescriptionsequencesymmetryanalysispssaandparallelgroupstudydesignsasystematicreview
AT biehlmichael effectestimatecomparisonbetweentheprescriptionsequencesymmetryanalysispssaandparallelgroupstudydesignsasystematicreview
AT horvatovichpeterl effectestimatecomparisonbetweentheprescriptionsequencesymmetryanalysispssaandparallelgroupstudydesignsasystematicreview
AT hakeelko effectestimatecomparisonbetweentheprescriptionsequencesymmetryanalysispssaandparallelgroupstudydesignsasystematicreview