Cargando…
Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001616 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053 |
_version_ | 1783379213082951680 |
---|---|
author | El Hajj, Ihab I. Wu, Howard Reuss, Sarah Randolph, Melissa Harris, Akeem Gromski, Mark A. Al-Haddad, Mohammad |
author_facet | El Hajj, Ihab I. Wu, Howard Reuss, Sarah Randolph, Melissa Harris, Akeem Gromski, Mark A. Al-Haddad, Mohammad |
author_sort | El Hajj, Ihab I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it with the historical FNA technique. METHODS: Acquire(®) 22 G FNB needle (Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) was used for solid tumor sampling (Study group). Tissue was collected for rapid on-site evaluation, and touch and crush preparations were made. Historical EUS-FNA samples obtained using Expect(®) 22 G FNA needle (Boston Scientific Co.) were used as controls (Control group). All specimens were independently evaluated by two cytopathologists blinded to the formal cytopathological diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean cell block histology scores were significantly higher (p=0.046) in the FNB group (51 samples) despite a significantly lower (p<0.001) mean number of passes compared to the FNA group (50 specimens). The overall diagnostic yields for the FNB vs. FNA groups were 96% vs. 88%. The degree of tumor differentiation was adequately assessed in all cell block qualifying lesions in the FNB group. Two patients developed post-FNB abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: The new Franseen tip FNB device provides histologically superior and cytologically comparable specimens to those obtained by FNA, but with fewer passes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6283768 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62837682018-12-20 Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions El Hajj, Ihab I. Wu, Howard Reuss, Sarah Randolph, Melissa Harris, Akeem Gromski, Mark A. Al-Haddad, Mohammad Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it with the historical FNA technique. METHODS: Acquire(®) 22 G FNB needle (Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) was used for solid tumor sampling (Study group). Tissue was collected for rapid on-site evaluation, and touch and crush preparations were made. Historical EUS-FNA samples obtained using Expect(®) 22 G FNA needle (Boston Scientific Co.) were used as controls (Control group). All specimens were independently evaluated by two cytopathologists blinded to the formal cytopathological diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean cell block histology scores were significantly higher (p=0.046) in the FNB group (51 samples) despite a significantly lower (p<0.001) mean number of passes compared to the FNA group (50 specimens). The overall diagnostic yields for the FNB vs. FNA groups were 96% vs. 88%. The degree of tumor differentiation was adequately assessed in all cell block qualifying lesions in the FNB group. Two patients developed post-FNB abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: The new Franseen tip FNB device provides histologically superior and cytologically comparable specimens to those obtained by FNA, but with fewer passes. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018-11 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6283768/ /pubmed/30001616 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article El Hajj, Ihab I. Wu, Howard Reuss, Sarah Randolph, Melissa Harris, Akeem Gromski, Mark A. Al-Haddad, Mohammad Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions |
title | Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions |
title_full | Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions |
title_fullStr | Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions |
title_short | Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions |
title_sort | prospective assessment of the performance of a new fine needle biopsy device for eus-guided sampling of solid lesions |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283768/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001616 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elhajjihabi prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions AT wuhoward prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions AT reusssarah prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions AT randolphmelissa prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions AT harrisakeem prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions AT gromskimarka prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions AT alhaddadmohammad prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions |