Cargando…

Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Hajj, Ihab I., Wu, Howard, Reuss, Sarah, Randolph, Melissa, Harris, Akeem, Gromski, Mark A., Al-Haddad, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001616
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053
_version_ 1783379213082951680
author El Hajj, Ihab I.
Wu, Howard
Reuss, Sarah
Randolph, Melissa
Harris, Akeem
Gromski, Mark A.
Al-Haddad, Mohammad
author_facet El Hajj, Ihab I.
Wu, Howard
Reuss, Sarah
Randolph, Melissa
Harris, Akeem
Gromski, Mark A.
Al-Haddad, Mohammad
author_sort El Hajj, Ihab I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it with the historical FNA technique. METHODS: Acquire(®) 22 G FNB needle (Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) was used for solid tumor sampling (Study group). Tissue was collected for rapid on-site evaluation, and touch and crush preparations were made. Historical EUS-FNA samples obtained using Expect(®) 22 G FNA needle (Boston Scientific Co.) were used as controls (Control group). All specimens were independently evaluated by two cytopathologists blinded to the formal cytopathological diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean cell block histology scores were significantly higher (p=0.046) in the FNB group (51 samples) despite a significantly lower (p<0.001) mean number of passes compared to the FNA group (50 specimens). The overall diagnostic yields for the FNB vs. FNA groups were 96% vs. 88%. The degree of tumor differentiation was adequately assessed in all cell block qualifying lesions in the FNB group. Two patients developed post-FNB abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: The new Franseen tip FNB device provides histologically superior and cytologically comparable specimens to those obtained by FNA, but with fewer passes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6283768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62837682018-12-20 Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions El Hajj, Ihab I. Wu, Howard Reuss, Sarah Randolph, Melissa Harris, Akeem Gromski, Mark A. Al-Haddad, Mohammad Clin Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) remains the most common EUS-guided tissue acquisition technique. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a new Franseen tip fine needle biopsy (FNB) device for EUSguided sampling of solid lesions and compare it with the historical FNA technique. METHODS: Acquire(®) 22 G FNB needle (Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) was used for solid tumor sampling (Study group). Tissue was collected for rapid on-site evaluation, and touch and crush preparations were made. Historical EUS-FNA samples obtained using Expect(®) 22 G FNA needle (Boston Scientific Co.) were used as controls (Control group). All specimens were independently evaluated by two cytopathologists blinded to the formal cytopathological diagnosis. RESULTS: Mean cell block histology scores were significantly higher (p=0.046) in the FNB group (51 samples) despite a significantly lower (p<0.001) mean number of passes compared to the FNA group (50 specimens). The overall diagnostic yields for the FNB vs. FNA groups were 96% vs. 88%. The degree of tumor differentiation was adequately assessed in all cell block qualifying lesions in the FNB group. Two patients developed post-FNB abdominal pain. CONCLUSIONS: The new Franseen tip FNB device provides histologically superior and cytologically comparable specimens to those obtained by FNA, but with fewer passes. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2018-11 2018-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6283768/ /pubmed/30001616 http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053 Text en Copyright © 2018 Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
El Hajj, Ihab I.
Wu, Howard
Reuss, Sarah
Randolph, Melissa
Harris, Akeem
Gromski, Mark A.
Al-Haddad, Mohammad
Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
title Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
title_full Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
title_fullStr Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
title_short Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
title_sort prospective assessment of the performance of a new fine needle biopsy device for eus-guided sampling of solid lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30001616
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053
work_keys_str_mv AT elhajjihabi prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions
AT wuhoward prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions
AT reusssarah prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions
AT randolphmelissa prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions
AT harrisakeem prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions
AT gromskimarka prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions
AT alhaddadmohammad prospectiveassessmentoftheperformanceofanewfineneedlebiopsydeviceforeusguidedsamplingofsolidlesions