Cargando…

Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia

Using a database of early farming sites in Scandinavia, we estimate that the spread rate of the Neolithic was in the range 0.44–0.66 km yr(−1). This is substantially slower (by about 50%) than the rate in continental Europe. We interpret this result in the framework of a new mathematical model that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fort, Joaquim, Mercè Pareta, Maria, Sørensen, Lasse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0597
_version_ 1783379249087905792
author Fort, Joaquim
Mercè Pareta, Maria
Sørensen, Lasse
author_facet Fort, Joaquim
Mercè Pareta, Maria
Sørensen, Lasse
author_sort Fort, Joaquim
collection PubMed
description Using a database of early farming sites in Scandinavia, we estimate that the spread rate of the Neolithic was in the range 0.44–0.66 km yr(−1). This is substantially slower (by about 50%) than the rate in continental Europe. We interpret this result in the framework of a new mathematical model that includes horizontal cultural transmission (acculturation), vertical cultural transmission (interbreeding) and demic diffusion (reproduction and dispersal of farmers). To parametrize the model, we estimate reproduction rates of early farmers using archaeological data (sum-calibrated probabilities for the dates of early Neolithic Scandinavian sites) and use them in a wave-of-advance model for the first time. Comparing the model with the archaeological data, we find that the percentage of the spread rate due to cultural diffusion is below 50% (except for very extreme parameter values, and even for them it is below 54%). This strongly suggests that the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia was driven mainly by demic diffusion. This conclusion, obtained from archaeological data, agrees qualitatively with the implications of ancient genetic data, but the latter are yet too few in Scandinavia to produce any quantitative percentage for the spread rate due to cultural diffusion. We also find that, on average, fewer than eight hunter–gatherers were incorporated in the Neolithic communities by each group of 10 pioneering farmers, via horizontal and/or vertical cultural transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6283996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62839962018-12-17 Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia Fort, Joaquim Mercè Pareta, Maria Sørensen, Lasse J R Soc Interface Life Sciences–Physics interface Using a database of early farming sites in Scandinavia, we estimate that the spread rate of the Neolithic was in the range 0.44–0.66 km yr(−1). This is substantially slower (by about 50%) than the rate in continental Europe. We interpret this result in the framework of a new mathematical model that includes horizontal cultural transmission (acculturation), vertical cultural transmission (interbreeding) and demic diffusion (reproduction and dispersal of farmers). To parametrize the model, we estimate reproduction rates of early farmers using archaeological data (sum-calibrated probabilities for the dates of early Neolithic Scandinavian sites) and use them in a wave-of-advance model for the first time. Comparing the model with the archaeological data, we find that the percentage of the spread rate due to cultural diffusion is below 50% (except for very extreme parameter values, and even for them it is below 54%). This strongly suggests that the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia was driven mainly by demic diffusion. This conclusion, obtained from archaeological data, agrees qualitatively with the implications of ancient genetic data, but the latter are yet too few in Scandinavia to produce any quantitative percentage for the spread rate due to cultural diffusion. We also find that, on average, fewer than eight hunter–gatherers were incorporated in the Neolithic communities by each group of 10 pioneering farmers, via horizontal and/or vertical cultural transmission. The Royal Society 2018-11 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6283996/ /pubmed/30464058 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0597 Text en © 2018 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Life Sciences–Physics interface
Fort, Joaquim
Mercè Pareta, Maria
Sørensen, Lasse
Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia
title Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia
title_full Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia
title_fullStr Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia
title_short Estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the Neolithic in Scandinavia
title_sort estimating the relative importance of demic and cultural diffusion in the spread of the neolithic in scandinavia
topic Life Sciences–Physics interface
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6283996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464058
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0597
work_keys_str_mv AT fortjoaquim estimatingtherelativeimportanceofdemicandculturaldiffusioninthespreadoftheneolithicinscandinavia
AT merceparetamaria estimatingtherelativeimportanceofdemicandculturaldiffusioninthespreadoftheneolithicinscandinavia
AT sørensenlasse estimatingtherelativeimportanceofdemicandculturaldiffusioninthespreadoftheneolithicinscandinavia