Cargando…

Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous computed tomography (CT) and quantitative CT (QCT) in patients with osteoporotic hip fracture (OHF) by analyzing the osteoporosis detection rate and physician prescription rate in comparison with those of conventional dual-energy X-r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Jae Han, Lim, Suhan, Lee, Young Han, Yang, Ick Hwan, Kam, Jin Hwa, Park, Kwan Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Hip Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534542
http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.4.233
_version_ 1783379266447081472
author Ko, Jae Han
Lim, Suhan
Lee, Young Han
Yang, Ick Hwan
Kam, Jin Hwa
Park, Kwan Kyu
author_facet Ko, Jae Han
Lim, Suhan
Lee, Young Han
Yang, Ick Hwan
Kam, Jin Hwa
Park, Kwan Kyu
author_sort Ko, Jae Han
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous computed tomography (CT) and quantitative CT (QCT) in patients with osteoporotic hip fracture (OHF) by analyzing the osteoporosis detection rate and physician prescription rate in comparison with those of conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included consecutive patients older than 65 years who underwent internal fixation or hip arthroplasty for OHF between February and May 2015. The patients were assigned to either the QCT (47 patients) or DXA group (51 patients). The patients in the QCT group underwent QCT with hip CT, whereas those in the DXA group underwent DXA after surgery, before discharge, or in the outpatient clinic. In both groups, the patients received osteoporosis medication according to their QCT or DXA results. The osteoporosis evaluation rate and prescription rate were determined at discharge, postoperative (PO) day 2, PO day 6, and PO week 12 during an outpatient clinic visit. RESULTS: The osteoporosis evaluation rate at PO week 12 was 70.6% (36 of 51 patients) in the DXA group and 100% in the QCT group (P<0.01). The prescription rates of osteoporosis medication at discharge were 70.2% and 29.4% (P<0.001) and the cumulative prescription rates at PO week 12 were 87.2% and 60.8% (P=0.003) in the QCT and DXA groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous CT and QCT significantly increased the evaluation and prescription rates in patients with OHF and may enable appropriate and consistent prescription of osteoporosis medication, which may eventually lead to patients' medication compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6284070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Hip Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62840702018-12-10 Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture? Ko, Jae Han Lim, Suhan Lee, Young Han Yang, Ick Hwan Kam, Jin Hwa Park, Kwan Kyu Hip Pelvis Original Article PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of simultaneous computed tomography (CT) and quantitative CT (QCT) in patients with osteoporotic hip fracture (OHF) by analyzing the osteoporosis detection rate and physician prescription rate in comparison with those of conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included consecutive patients older than 65 years who underwent internal fixation or hip arthroplasty for OHF between February and May 2015. The patients were assigned to either the QCT (47 patients) or DXA group (51 patients). The patients in the QCT group underwent QCT with hip CT, whereas those in the DXA group underwent DXA after surgery, before discharge, or in the outpatient clinic. In both groups, the patients received osteoporosis medication according to their QCT or DXA results. The osteoporosis evaluation rate and prescription rate were determined at discharge, postoperative (PO) day 2, PO day 6, and PO week 12 during an outpatient clinic visit. RESULTS: The osteoporosis evaluation rate at PO week 12 was 70.6% (36 of 51 patients) in the DXA group and 100% in the QCT group (P<0.01). The prescription rates of osteoporosis medication at discharge were 70.2% and 29.4% (P<0.001) and the cumulative prescription rates at PO week 12 were 87.2% and 60.8% (P=0.003) in the QCT and DXA groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous CT and QCT significantly increased the evaluation and prescription rates in patients with OHF and may enable appropriate and consistent prescription of osteoporosis medication, which may eventually lead to patients' medication compliance. Korean Hip Society 2018-12 2018-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6284070/ /pubmed/30534542 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.4.233 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Hip Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ko, Jae Han
Lim, Suhan
Lee, Young Han
Yang, Ick Hwan
Kam, Jin Hwa
Park, Kwan Kyu
Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
title Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
title_full Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
title_fullStr Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
title_full_unstemmed Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
title_short Does Simultaneous Computed Tomography and Quantitative Computed Tomography Show Better Prescription Rate than Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Osteoporotic Hip Fracture?
title_sort does simultaneous computed tomography and quantitative computed tomography show better prescription rate than dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for osteoporotic hip fracture?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534542
http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.4.233
work_keys_str_mv AT kojaehan doessimultaneouscomputedtomographyandquantitativecomputedtomographyshowbetterprescriptionratethandualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforosteoporotichipfracture
AT limsuhan doessimultaneouscomputedtomographyandquantitativecomputedtomographyshowbetterprescriptionratethandualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforosteoporotichipfracture
AT leeyounghan doessimultaneouscomputedtomographyandquantitativecomputedtomographyshowbetterprescriptionratethandualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforosteoporotichipfracture
AT yangickhwan doessimultaneouscomputedtomographyandquantitativecomputedtomographyshowbetterprescriptionratethandualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforosteoporotichipfracture
AT kamjinhwa doessimultaneouscomputedtomographyandquantitativecomputedtomographyshowbetterprescriptionratethandualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforosteoporotichipfracture
AT parkkwankyu doessimultaneouscomputedtomographyandquantitativecomputedtomographyshowbetterprescriptionratethandualenergyxrayabsorptiometryforosteoporotichipfracture