Cargando…
Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
BACKGROUND: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO(2) when using SCBA. METHODS: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.002 |
_version_ | 1783379288415797248 |
---|---|
author | Hostler, David Pendergast, David R. |
author_facet | Hostler, David Pendergast, David R. |
author_sort | Hostler, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO(2) when using SCBA. METHODS: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two graded exercise tests (GXTs) at 25%, 50%, and 70% of their maximal aerobic power, once with a SCBA facemask and once with protective clothing and full SCBA. RESULTS: Respiratory rate increased more in controls than firefighters. Heart rate increased as a function of oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]) more in controls than firefighters. End-tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) during the GXTs was not affected by work rate in either group for either condition but was higher in firefighters at all work rates in both GXTs. SCBA increased ETCO(2) in controls but not firefighters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that when compared to controls, firefighters’ hypoventilate during a maximal test and GXT. The hypoventilation resulted in increased ETCO(2), and presumably increased arterial CO(2), during exertion. It is proposed that firefighters have altered CO(2) sensitivity due to voluntary hypoventilation during training and work. Confirmation of low CO(2) sensitivity and the consequence of this on performance and long-term health remain to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6284167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62841672018-12-17 Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters Hostler, David Pendergast, David R. Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO(2) when using SCBA. METHODS: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two graded exercise tests (GXTs) at 25%, 50%, and 70% of their maximal aerobic power, once with a SCBA facemask and once with protective clothing and full SCBA. RESULTS: Respiratory rate increased more in controls than firefighters. Heart rate increased as a function of oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]) more in controls than firefighters. End-tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) during the GXTs was not affected by work rate in either group for either condition but was higher in firefighters at all work rates in both GXTs. SCBA increased ETCO(2) in controls but not firefighters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that when compared to controls, firefighters’ hypoventilate during a maximal test and GXT. The hypoventilation resulted in increased ETCO(2), and presumably increased arterial CO(2), during exertion. It is proposed that firefighters have altered CO(2) sensitivity due to voluntary hypoventilation during training and work. Confirmation of low CO(2) sensitivity and the consequence of this on performance and long-term health remain to be determined. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2018-12 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6284167/ /pubmed/30559997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.002 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hostler, David Pendergast, David R. Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_full | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_fullStr | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_full_unstemmed | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_short | Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters |
title_sort | respiratory responses during exercise in self-contained breathing apparatus among firefighters and nonfirefighters |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hostlerdavid respiratoryresponsesduringexerciseinselfcontainedbreathingapparatusamongfirefightersandnonfirefighters AT pendergastdavidr respiratoryresponsesduringexerciseinselfcontainedbreathingapparatusamongfirefightersandnonfirefighters |