Cargando…

Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters

BACKGROUND: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO(2) when using SCBA. METHODS: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hostler, David, Pendergast, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.002
_version_ 1783379288415797248
author Hostler, David
Pendergast, David R.
author_facet Hostler, David
Pendergast, David R.
author_sort Hostler, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO(2) when using SCBA. METHODS: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two graded exercise tests (GXTs) at 25%, 50%, and 70% of their maximal aerobic power, once with a SCBA facemask and once with protective clothing and full SCBA. RESULTS: Respiratory rate increased more in controls than firefighters. Heart rate increased as a function of oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]) more in controls than firefighters. End-tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) during the GXTs was not affected by work rate in either group for either condition but was higher in firefighters at all work rates in both GXTs. SCBA increased ETCO(2) in controls but not firefighters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that when compared to controls, firefighters’ hypoventilate during a maximal test and GXT. The hypoventilation resulted in increased ETCO(2), and presumably increased arterial CO(2), during exertion. It is proposed that firefighters have altered CO(2) sensitivity due to voluntary hypoventilation during training and work. Confirmation of low CO(2) sensitivity and the consequence of this on performance and long-term health remain to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6284167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62841672018-12-17 Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters Hostler, David Pendergast, David R. Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: Firefighters are required to use self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), which impairs ventilatory mechanics. We hypothesized that firefighters have elevated arterial CO(2) when using SCBA. METHODS: Firefighters and controls performed a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer and two graded exercise tests (GXTs) at 25%, 50%, and 70% of their maximal aerobic power, once with a SCBA facemask and once with protective clothing and full SCBA. RESULTS: Respiratory rate increased more in controls than firefighters. Heart rate increased as a function of oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]) more in controls than firefighters. End-tidal CO(2) (ETCO(2)) during the GXTs was not affected by work rate in either group for either condition but was higher in firefighters at all work rates in both GXTs. SCBA increased ETCO(2) in controls but not firefighters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that when compared to controls, firefighters’ hypoventilate during a maximal test and GXT. The hypoventilation resulted in increased ETCO(2), and presumably increased arterial CO(2), during exertion. It is proposed that firefighters have altered CO(2) sensitivity due to voluntary hypoventilation during training and work. Confirmation of low CO(2) sensitivity and the consequence of this on performance and long-term health remain to be determined. Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute 2018-12 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6284167/ /pubmed/30559997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.002 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Hostler, David
Pendergast, David R.
Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
title Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
title_full Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
title_fullStr Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
title_short Respiratory Responses during Exercise in Self-contained Breathing Apparatus among Firefighters and Nonfirefighters
title_sort respiratory responses during exercise in self-contained breathing apparatus among firefighters and nonfirefighters
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30559997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT hostlerdavid respiratoryresponsesduringexerciseinselfcontainedbreathingapparatusamongfirefightersandnonfirefighters
AT pendergastdavidr respiratoryresponsesduringexerciseinselfcontainedbreathingapparatusamongfirefightersandnonfirefighters