Cargando…

Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial

Objective To determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital, Australia. Participants 354 infants (aged 1-12 months) requiring u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaufman, Jonathan, Fitzpatrick, Patrick, Tosif, Shidan, Hopper, Sandy M, Donath, Susan M, Bryant, Penelope A, Babl, Franz E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1341
_version_ 1783379298173845504
author Kaufman, Jonathan
Fitzpatrick, Patrick
Tosif, Shidan
Hopper, Sandy M
Donath, Susan M
Bryant, Penelope A
Babl, Franz E
author_facet Kaufman, Jonathan
Fitzpatrick, Patrick
Tosif, Shidan
Hopper, Sandy M
Donath, Susan M
Bryant, Penelope A
Babl, Franz E
author_sort Kaufman, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital, Australia. Participants 354 infants (aged 1-12 months) requiring urine sample collection as determined by the treating clinician. 10 infants were subsequently excluded. Interventions Infants were randomised to either gentle suprapubic cutaneous stimulation (n=174) using gauze soaked in cold fluid (the Quick-Wee method) or standard clean catch urine with no additional stimulation (n=170), for five minutes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was voiding of urine within five minutes. Secondary outcomes were successful collection of a urine sample, contamination rate, and parental and clinician satisfaction with the method. Results The Quick-Wee method resulted in a significantly higher rate of voiding within five minutes compared with standard clean catch urine (31% v 12%, P<0.001), difference in proportions 19% favouring Quick-Wee (95% confidence interval for difference 11% to 28%). Quick-Wee had a higher rate of successful urine sample collection (30% v 9%, P<0.001) and greater parental and clinician satisfaction (median 2 v 3 on a 5 point Likert scale, P<0.001). The difference in contamination between Quick-Wee and standard clean catch urine was not significant (27% v 45%, P=0.29). The number needed to treat was 4.7 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 7.7) to successfully collect one additional urine sample within five minutes using Quick-Wee compared with standard clean catch urine. Conclusions Quick-Wee is a simple cutaneous stimulation method that significantly increases the five minute voiding and success rate of clean catch urine collection. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000754549.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6284210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62842102019-01-08 Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial Kaufman, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Patrick Tosif, Shidan Hopper, Sandy M Donath, Susan M Bryant, Penelope A Babl, Franz E BMJ Research Objective To determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital, Australia. Participants 354 infants (aged 1-12 months) requiring urine sample collection as determined by the treating clinician. 10 infants were subsequently excluded. Interventions Infants were randomised to either gentle suprapubic cutaneous stimulation (n=174) using gauze soaked in cold fluid (the Quick-Wee method) or standard clean catch urine with no additional stimulation (n=170), for five minutes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was voiding of urine within five minutes. Secondary outcomes were successful collection of a urine sample, contamination rate, and parental and clinician satisfaction with the method. Results The Quick-Wee method resulted in a significantly higher rate of voiding within five minutes compared with standard clean catch urine (31% v 12%, P<0.001), difference in proportions 19% favouring Quick-Wee (95% confidence interval for difference 11% to 28%). Quick-Wee had a higher rate of successful urine sample collection (30% v 9%, P<0.001) and greater parental and clinician satisfaction (median 2 v 3 on a 5 point Likert scale, P<0.001). The difference in contamination between Quick-Wee and standard clean catch urine was not significant (27% v 45%, P=0.29). The number needed to treat was 4.7 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 7.7) to successfully collect one additional urine sample within five minutes using Quick-Wee compared with standard clean catch urine. Conclusions Quick-Wee is a simple cutaneous stimulation method that significantly increases the five minute voiding and success rate of clean catch urine collection. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000754549. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6284210/ /pubmed/28389435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1341 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Kaufman, Jonathan
Fitzpatrick, Patrick
Tosif, Shidan
Hopper, Sandy M
Donath, Susan M
Bryant, Penelope A
Babl, Franz E
Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
title Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
title_full Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
title_short Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
title_sort faster clean catch urine collection (quick-wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1341
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmanjonathan fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fitzpatrickpatrick fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tosifshidan fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hoppersandym fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT donathsusanm fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bryantpenelopea fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bablfranze fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial