Cargando…
Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial
Objective To determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital, Australia. Participants 354 infants (aged 1-12 months) requiring u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1341 |
_version_ | 1783379298173845504 |
---|---|
author | Kaufman, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Patrick Tosif, Shidan Hopper, Sandy M Donath, Susan M Bryant, Penelope A Babl, Franz E |
author_facet | Kaufman, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Patrick Tosif, Shidan Hopper, Sandy M Donath, Susan M Bryant, Penelope A Babl, Franz E |
author_sort | Kaufman, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital, Australia. Participants 354 infants (aged 1-12 months) requiring urine sample collection as determined by the treating clinician. 10 infants were subsequently excluded. Interventions Infants were randomised to either gentle suprapubic cutaneous stimulation (n=174) using gauze soaked in cold fluid (the Quick-Wee method) or standard clean catch urine with no additional stimulation (n=170), for five minutes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was voiding of urine within five minutes. Secondary outcomes were successful collection of a urine sample, contamination rate, and parental and clinician satisfaction with the method. Results The Quick-Wee method resulted in a significantly higher rate of voiding within five minutes compared with standard clean catch urine (31% v 12%, P<0.001), difference in proportions 19% favouring Quick-Wee (95% confidence interval for difference 11% to 28%). Quick-Wee had a higher rate of successful urine sample collection (30% v 9%, P<0.001) and greater parental and clinician satisfaction (median 2 v 3 on a 5 point Likert scale, P<0.001). The difference in contamination between Quick-Wee and standard clean catch urine was not significant (27% v 45%, P=0.29). The number needed to treat was 4.7 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 7.7) to successfully collect one additional urine sample within five minutes using Quick-Wee compared with standard clean catch urine. Conclusions Quick-Wee is a simple cutaneous stimulation method that significantly increases the five minute voiding and success rate of clean catch urine collection. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000754549. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6284210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62842102019-01-08 Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial Kaufman, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Patrick Tosif, Shidan Hopper, Sandy M Donath, Susan M Bryant, Penelope A Babl, Franz E BMJ Research Objective To determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital, Australia. Participants 354 infants (aged 1-12 months) requiring urine sample collection as determined by the treating clinician. 10 infants were subsequently excluded. Interventions Infants were randomised to either gentle suprapubic cutaneous stimulation (n=174) using gauze soaked in cold fluid (the Quick-Wee method) or standard clean catch urine with no additional stimulation (n=170), for five minutes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was voiding of urine within five minutes. Secondary outcomes were successful collection of a urine sample, contamination rate, and parental and clinician satisfaction with the method. Results The Quick-Wee method resulted in a significantly higher rate of voiding within five minutes compared with standard clean catch urine (31% v 12%, P<0.001), difference in proportions 19% favouring Quick-Wee (95% confidence interval for difference 11% to 28%). Quick-Wee had a higher rate of successful urine sample collection (30% v 9%, P<0.001) and greater parental and clinician satisfaction (median 2 v 3 on a 5 point Likert scale, P<0.001). The difference in contamination between Quick-Wee and standard clean catch urine was not significant (27% v 45%, P=0.29). The number needed to treat was 4.7 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 7.7) to successfully collect one additional urine sample within five minutes using Quick-Wee compared with standard clean catch urine. Conclusions Quick-Wee is a simple cutaneous stimulation method that significantly increases the five minute voiding and success rate of clean catch urine collection. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000754549. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6284210/ /pubmed/28389435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1341 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Kaufman, Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Patrick Tosif, Shidan Hopper, Sandy M Donath, Susan M Bryant, Penelope A Babl, Franz E Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants: randomised controlled trial |
title | Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants:
randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants:
randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants:
randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants:
randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Faster clean catch urine collection (Quick-Wee method) from infants:
randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | faster clean catch urine collection (quick-wee method) from infants:
randomised controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28389435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaufmanjonathan fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fitzpatrickpatrick fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tosifshidan fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hoppersandym fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT donathsusanm fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bryantpenelopea fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bablfranze fastercleancatchurinecollectionquickweemethodfrominfantsrandomisedcontrolledtrial |