Cargando…

Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the detection rate and image quality in CT-body-packer-screening at different radiation-dose levels and to determine a dose threshold that enables a reliable detection of incorporated body packs and incidental findings with a maximum of dose saving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aissa, Joel, Bölke, Edwin, Sawicki, Lino M., Appel, Elisabeth, Thomas, Christoph, Heusch, Philipp, Sedlmair, Martin, Krzymyk, Karl, Kröpil, Patric, Antoch, Gerald, Boos, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0356-3
_version_ 1783379309631635456
author Aissa, Joel
Bölke, Edwin
Sawicki, Lino M.
Appel, Elisabeth
Thomas, Christoph
Heusch, Philipp
Sedlmair, Martin
Krzymyk, Karl
Kröpil, Patric
Antoch, Gerald
Boos, Johannes
author_facet Aissa, Joel
Bölke, Edwin
Sawicki, Lino M.
Appel, Elisabeth
Thomas, Christoph
Heusch, Philipp
Sedlmair, Martin
Krzymyk, Karl
Kröpil, Patric
Antoch, Gerald
Boos, Johannes
author_sort Aissa, Joel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the detection rate and image quality in CT-body-packer-screening at different radiation-dose levels and to determine a dose threshold that enables a reliable detection of incorporated body packs and incidental findings with a maximum of dose saving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 27 individuals who underwent an abdominal CT with automated exposure control due to suspected body packing. CT images were reconstructed at different radiation-dose levels of 50%, 10, 5% and 1% using iterative reconstructions. All 135 CT reconstructions were evaluated by three independent readers. Reviewers determined the presence of foreign bodies and evaluated the image quality using a 5-point ranking scale. In addition, visualization of incidental findings was assessed. RESULTS: A threshold of 5% (effective dose 0.11 ± 0.07 mSv) was necessary to correctly identify all 27 patients with suspected body packing. Extensive noise insertion to a dose level of 1% (0.02 ± 0.01 mSV) led to false-positive solid cocaine findings in three patients. Image quality was comparable between 100 and 50%. The threshold for correct identification of incidental findings was 10% of the initial dose (effective dose 0.21 ± 0.13 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that dose of abdominal CT for the detection of intracorporeal cocaine body packets can be markedly reduced to up to 5% of the initial dose while still providing sufficient image quality to detect ingested body packets. However, a minimum effective dose of 0.21 mSv (10% of initial dose) seems to be required to properly identify incidental findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6284291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62842912018-12-14 Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? Aissa, Joel Bölke, Edwin Sawicki, Lino M. Appel, Elisabeth Thomas, Christoph Heusch, Philipp Sedlmair, Martin Krzymyk, Karl Kröpil, Patric Antoch, Gerald Boos, Johannes Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the detection rate and image quality in CT-body-packer-screening at different radiation-dose levels and to determine a dose threshold that enables a reliable detection of incorporated body packs and incidental findings with a maximum of dose saving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 27 individuals who underwent an abdominal CT with automated exposure control due to suspected body packing. CT images were reconstructed at different radiation-dose levels of 50%, 10, 5% and 1% using iterative reconstructions. All 135 CT reconstructions were evaluated by three independent readers. Reviewers determined the presence of foreign bodies and evaluated the image quality using a 5-point ranking scale. In addition, visualization of incidental findings was assessed. RESULTS: A threshold of 5% (effective dose 0.11 ± 0.07 mSv) was necessary to correctly identify all 27 patients with suspected body packing. Extensive noise insertion to a dose level of 1% (0.02 ± 0.01 mSV) led to false-positive solid cocaine findings in three patients. Image quality was comparable between 100 and 50%. The threshold for correct identification of incidental findings was 10% of the initial dose (effective dose 0.21 ± 0.13 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that dose of abdominal CT for the detection of intracorporeal cocaine body packets can be markedly reduced to up to 5% of the initial dose while still providing sufficient image quality to detect ingested body packets. However, a minimum effective dose of 0.21 mSv (10% of initial dose) seems to be required to properly identify incidental findings. BioMed Central 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6284291/ /pubmed/30526681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0356-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Aissa, Joel
Bölke, Edwin
Sawicki, Lino M.
Appel, Elisabeth
Thomas, Christoph
Heusch, Philipp
Sedlmair, Martin
Krzymyk, Karl
Kröpil, Patric
Antoch, Gerald
Boos, Johannes
Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
title Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
title_full Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
title_fullStr Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
title_full_unstemmed Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
title_short Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
title_sort noise insertion in ct for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0356-3
work_keys_str_mv AT aissajoel noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT bolkeedwin noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT sawickilinom noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT appelelisabeth noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT thomaschristoph noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT heuschphilipp noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT sedlmairmartin noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT krzymykkarl noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT kropilpatric noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT antochgerald noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction
AT boosjohannes noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction