Cargando…
Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the detection rate and image quality in CT-body-packer-screening at different radiation-dose levels and to determine a dose threshold that enables a reliable detection of incorporated body packs and incidental findings with a maximum of dose saving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0356-3 |
_version_ | 1783379309631635456 |
---|---|
author | Aissa, Joel Bölke, Edwin Sawicki, Lino M. Appel, Elisabeth Thomas, Christoph Heusch, Philipp Sedlmair, Martin Krzymyk, Karl Kröpil, Patric Antoch, Gerald Boos, Johannes |
author_facet | Aissa, Joel Bölke, Edwin Sawicki, Lino M. Appel, Elisabeth Thomas, Christoph Heusch, Philipp Sedlmair, Martin Krzymyk, Karl Kröpil, Patric Antoch, Gerald Boos, Johannes |
author_sort | Aissa, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the detection rate and image quality in CT-body-packer-screening at different radiation-dose levels and to determine a dose threshold that enables a reliable detection of incorporated body packs and incidental findings with a maximum of dose saving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 27 individuals who underwent an abdominal CT with automated exposure control due to suspected body packing. CT images were reconstructed at different radiation-dose levels of 50%, 10, 5% and 1% using iterative reconstructions. All 135 CT reconstructions were evaluated by three independent readers. Reviewers determined the presence of foreign bodies and evaluated the image quality using a 5-point ranking scale. In addition, visualization of incidental findings was assessed. RESULTS: A threshold of 5% (effective dose 0.11 ± 0.07 mSv) was necessary to correctly identify all 27 patients with suspected body packing. Extensive noise insertion to a dose level of 1% (0.02 ± 0.01 mSV) led to false-positive solid cocaine findings in three patients. Image quality was comparable between 100 and 50%. The threshold for correct identification of incidental findings was 10% of the initial dose (effective dose 0.21 ± 0.13 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that dose of abdominal CT for the detection of intracorporeal cocaine body packets can be markedly reduced to up to 5% of the initial dose while still providing sufficient image quality to detect ingested body packets. However, a minimum effective dose of 0.21 mSv (10% of initial dose) seems to be required to properly identify incidental findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6284291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62842912018-12-14 Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? Aissa, Joel Bölke, Edwin Sawicki, Lino M. Appel, Elisabeth Thomas, Christoph Heusch, Philipp Sedlmair, Martin Krzymyk, Karl Kröpil, Patric Antoch, Gerald Boos, Johannes Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the detection rate and image quality in CT-body-packer-screening at different radiation-dose levels and to determine a dose threshold that enables a reliable detection of incorporated body packs and incidental findings with a maximum of dose saving. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 27 individuals who underwent an abdominal CT with automated exposure control due to suspected body packing. CT images were reconstructed at different radiation-dose levels of 50%, 10, 5% and 1% using iterative reconstructions. All 135 CT reconstructions were evaluated by three independent readers. Reviewers determined the presence of foreign bodies and evaluated the image quality using a 5-point ranking scale. In addition, visualization of incidental findings was assessed. RESULTS: A threshold of 5% (effective dose 0.11 ± 0.07 mSv) was necessary to correctly identify all 27 patients with suspected body packing. Extensive noise insertion to a dose level of 1% (0.02 ± 0.01 mSV) led to false-positive solid cocaine findings in three patients. Image quality was comparable between 100 and 50%. The threshold for correct identification of incidental findings was 10% of the initial dose (effective dose 0.21 ± 0.13 mSv). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that dose of abdominal CT for the detection of intracorporeal cocaine body packets can be markedly reduced to up to 5% of the initial dose while still providing sufficient image quality to detect ingested body packets. However, a minimum effective dose of 0.21 mSv (10% of initial dose) seems to be required to properly identify incidental findings. BioMed Central 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6284291/ /pubmed/30526681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0356-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Aissa, Joel Bölke, Edwin Sawicki, Lino M. Appel, Elisabeth Thomas, Christoph Heusch, Philipp Sedlmair, Martin Krzymyk, Karl Kröpil, Patric Antoch, Gerald Boos, Johannes Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
title | Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
title_full | Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
title_fullStr | Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
title_full_unstemmed | Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
title_short | Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
title_sort | noise insertion in ct for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6284291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30526681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-018-0356-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aissajoel noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT bolkeedwin noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT sawickilinom noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT appelelisabeth noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT thomaschristoph noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT heuschphilipp noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT sedlmairmartin noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT krzymykkarl noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT kropilpatric noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT antochgerald noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction AT boosjohannes noiseinsertioninctforcocainebodypackingwhereisthelimitofextensivedosereduction |