Cargando…

Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps

The study aimed to find a more appropriate method to detect eosinophils in formalin- fixed nasal polyps, since there is no consensus on the standard counting method of eosinophils now. Four 5 μm serial sections were obtained from each 10% neutral formalin-fixed paraffin block and were stained with C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Yu, Yin, Jinshu, Chang, Hong, Zhou, Quan, Peng, Hong, Ji, Wei, Song, Qingkun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30531899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36102-y
_version_ 1783379436832292864
author Song, Yu
Yin, Jinshu
Chang, Hong
Zhou, Quan
Peng, Hong
Ji, Wei
Song, Qingkun
author_facet Song, Yu
Yin, Jinshu
Chang, Hong
Zhou, Quan
Peng, Hong
Ji, Wei
Song, Qingkun
author_sort Song, Yu
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to find a more appropriate method to detect eosinophils in formalin- fixed nasal polyps, since there is no consensus on the standard counting method of eosinophils now. Four 5 μm serial sections were obtained from each 10% neutral formalin-fixed paraffin block and were stained with Chromotrope 2R, Congo red, MBPmAb immunohistochemistry, and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain respectively. Each section was scanned by the Aperio digital section scanner. The same selected areas were procured for assessment in the serial sections. Chromotrope 2R and MBPmAb immunohistochemistry were specific in detecting eosinophils, which had the lower background staining compared with Congo red and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain. There were significant differences among the four methods in terms of the eosinophil counting data (p < 0.05), while no significant difference between Chromotrope 2R and Congo red (P = 0.1413). The eosinophil counts in nasal polyps could be more accurately assessed by Chromotrope 2R and Congo red compared with MBPmAb immunohistochemistry and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain. The popularization of Chromotrope 2R and Congo red may help to unify the eosinophil count in the definition of eosinophilic CRSwNP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6286356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62863562018-12-19 Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps Song, Yu Yin, Jinshu Chang, Hong Zhou, Quan Peng, Hong Ji, Wei Song, Qingkun Sci Rep Article The study aimed to find a more appropriate method to detect eosinophils in formalin- fixed nasal polyps, since there is no consensus on the standard counting method of eosinophils now. Four 5 μm serial sections were obtained from each 10% neutral formalin-fixed paraffin block and were stained with Chromotrope 2R, Congo red, MBPmAb immunohistochemistry, and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain respectively. Each section was scanned by the Aperio digital section scanner. The same selected areas were procured for assessment in the serial sections. Chromotrope 2R and MBPmAb immunohistochemistry were specific in detecting eosinophils, which had the lower background staining compared with Congo red and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain. There were significant differences among the four methods in terms of the eosinophil counting data (p < 0.05), while no significant difference between Chromotrope 2R and Congo red (P = 0.1413). The eosinophil counts in nasal polyps could be more accurately assessed by Chromotrope 2R and Congo red compared with MBPmAb immunohistochemistry and conventional hematoxylin and eosin stain. The popularization of Chromotrope 2R and Congo red may help to unify the eosinophil count in the definition of eosinophilic CRSwNP. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6286356/ /pubmed/30531899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36102-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Song, Yu
Yin, Jinshu
Chang, Hong
Zhou, Quan
Peng, Hong
Ji, Wei
Song, Qingkun
Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
title Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
title_full Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
title_fullStr Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
title_short Comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
title_sort comparison of four staining methods for detecting eosinophils in nasal polyps
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6286356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30531899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36102-y
work_keys_str_mv AT songyu comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps
AT yinjinshu comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps
AT changhong comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps
AT zhouquan comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps
AT penghong comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps
AT jiwei comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps
AT songqingkun comparisonoffourstainingmethodsfordetectingeosinophilsinnasalpolyps